On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:17:53PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:11:24AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> >The proposal is not to create a new distribution, but simply haev EOLed
> >branches acl removed and leave th epossibility to build and push th
> >eresults, with a limitation of the changes to grave bug fixes and
> >security issues.
>
> Except that conflicts with what you said above about "...use innovative
> technologies while not being forced to update each year.".
I wasn't clear, I should have said 'use innovative technologies during
the time fedora is not eol', while not being forced to update each year
(that's for the 'LTS' part).
Ah. And how is that different from CentOS? At the time CentOS 5 was
release, it also contained the latest "innovative" technologies. So,
what would be different about a Fedora LTS?
josh