On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 10:29 -0400, Tom Rivers wrote:
On 7/28/2008 10:04 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Again, ethical/political/etc questions have no place in an ML that -should- be dedicated to users who seek help. I doubt that they even have place in -testing and/or -devel.
I've been subscribed to fedora-* more-or-less since FC2. For the first time in years I'm thinking about unsubscribing
I've been on these lists from the early days as well. I've seen some interesting discussions, however I was never under the impression that this was as big of a problem as some people seem to portray it. Does anyone have any metrics on how many of these "inappropriate" threads there truly are in relation to how many are "appropriate"? I think it would help make this issue much more clear. For example, if we are talking about less than 1% of all posts are "inappropriate", then that is a heck of a lot different than if it is 35%. Similarly, if there are say 10,000 posts in a month, 1% is a bigger problem than if there are only 100 posts per month.
So, do we have some actual numbers or is it just a "gut feel"?
Tom
I don't have solid numbers, but at least according to my gmail trash contents, around ~1/4-1/5 of the posts that were sent to -users between, say, Tuesday and Saturday belonged to one of the 4 "GPL" threads.
... And even if I'm wrong by an order of magnitude, and we are only talking about 10% of all the -users traffic, given the fact that these threads are off-topic to being with, this is way-too-much.
- Gilboa