On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:25 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> This rationale contributes to me not to consider RHEL and CentOS, which
> is the rationale why I don't consider them to be replacements for a
> "Fedora LTS".
So CentOS is non-free?
CentOS is free as "free-beer", but CentOS is not
free to take decisions
on their own, because they depend on RHEL's sources.