On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:02:25 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 01:37 +0500, Suren Karapetyan wrote:
You will not find anyone @RH who will agree that previews behavior was better
On the contrary, you'll likely find many people who work for Red Hat that would prefer the old behavior, they're just not wasting their time by arguing about it on a distribution mailing list.
In a survey of 10 RH employees you will find between 10 and 40 different opinions. sometimes more if you don't ask some of them to confine their comments to a limited amount of time.
Classical situation to call "the management", let them decide and to name "someone to be in charge/responsible".
Unfortunately, this current FESCO has refused to decide.
No. FESCo did decide not to force maintainers to revert this change.
Speaking only for myself, I think such micro-management sets a bad precedent and should be avoided except in extraordinary situations, which I don't think this is.
kevin