Wtf?!
Why?!?!
Er.. sorry, it was the shock. But now, serioulsy: why?! Pine is great!
Vantroy
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Havoc Pennington (hp(a)redhat.com) said:
>On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 16:18, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>
>>I'm wondering if there are any free software guidelines for Fedora. Most
>>specifically, I'm wondering if Luxi fonts will continue to be
>>distributed with Fedora.
>>
>>Anybody knows details?
>
>There aren't detailed guidelines yet. My view is that we can be a bit
>more liberal about font licenses than software licenses. I would like to
>see us be both FSF and
opensource.org approved for the software in the
>distribution, though. Only thing I know of that isn't OK right now is
>pine.
pine isn't included.
Bill
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list