efl should be fixed in rawhide now.
~spot
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:32 AM Michael J Gruber mjg@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Am Mi., 31. Jan. 2024 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik <mkasik@redhat.com
:
Hi,
On 1/30/24 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide
before
the branching together with rebuilds of dependent packages.
I'll prepare the build in a side tag and will message relevant maintainers to rebuild their packages there.
The packages which will need rebuilds: calligra gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape kf5-kitinerary libreoffice pdf2djvu scribus
That list is surprisingly short. For example, poppler-glib requires a specific poppler version, and via poppler-glib-devel that affects more packages (zathura-pdf-poppler comes to my mind).
Does libpoppler-glib stay at the same soname and "absorb" all poppler changes behind its ABI?
yes, libpoppler-glib and other front-ends are stable so they'll stay on their sonames. The soname which is going to be changed is soname of the core library which is not stable. The packages mentioned above uses the core library directly so we have to keep the unstable API available.
Thanks, that clarifies everything.
Cheers Michael -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue