Richard Shaw wrote:
Per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539386 I've now
been
bitten twice after being asked to update a package in EPEL.
Per this version this was a patch level update but it still breaks
applications so I'm wondering if it would just be best to only supply a
static library, at least in EPEL...
I can't speak for EPEL, but in Fedora I'd rather you just bump the soname
and rebuild the applications using the library when it is needed.
Kevin Kofler