Re: SInjdoc, gjdoc, and annotations

[Andrew Overholt]

On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 10:26 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>  
>  On 8/28/07, Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 22:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>  > > Is gjdoc going to be made available for F-7, or am I stuck with
>  the
>  > > javadoc that is missing support for annotations?  Thanks,
>  >
>  > During F7 development we removed gjdoc in favour of sinjdoc for
>  various
>  > reasons (basically dead upstream, didn't support 1.5 features).  If
>  > you'd like, you could resurrect gjdoc for F7.
>  
>  I see.  In that case, it's probably better to add annotation support
>  to sinjdoc.  I'll contact upstream and see if somebody is working on
>  that; if not, I'll have a look at what needs to be done.  
Note that this will not matter for x86 and x86_64 for F8 with the
inclusion of IcedTea and will hopefully not matter much longer than F8
for ppc and other platforms.

Andrew