On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Garrett mjg@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:56:34AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Abusing the Fedora as Guinea pigs, as they've done many times before.
By doing the change upstream?
When "upstreams" are identical to the fedora maintainers, the "upstream argument" is moot. They are in a position to commit any stupidity they want upstream and label it "upstream decsion".
I think that basically all the Fedora X maintainers are upstream - however, not all of upstream are Fedora X maintainers.
Just one question.
How can fedora ever be objective about an issue like this if: (quote) "all the Fedora X maintainers are upstream"
.... ? i'm interested in your reply on this one. (and a reply from all RH/fedora ppl in this thread btw)