On Fri, Jan 6 2023 at 11:06:26 AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro mcatanzaro@redhat.com wrote:
(a) Specific services want longer timeouts.
This can already be configured via existing configuration mechanisms, so I think it's safe enough to ignore this problem. E.g. if a quick shutdown will brick your Pinephone modem or corrupt your database, then whatever service is involved there should request a larger timeout.
Erm, at least... I think that would work? We'd need to make sure....