On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc(a)odusz.so-cdu.ru> wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc(a)odusz.so-cdu.ru>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Matej Cepl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> b) If anybody is running production servers on Fedora, then worse for
>>> him
>>>
>>
>> Well, how about enthusiasm here?
>>
>> What should do some previously RedHat-oriented enthusiast, when all the
>> area
>> for application of his enthusiasm is some "production environment"?
Use
>> RHEL/CentOS anywhere and Fedora on his laptop only? But RHEL/CentOS is
>> far
>> from the "bleeding edge", hence his enthusiasm just disappear...
>>
>
>
>
> I don't understand what you're saying. Why do you need to be
> bleeding-edge in your stable environments?
>
Well, not the "bleeding-edge" literally.
An environment, which is considered stable, can be "untypical". Ie.
"untypical production stable environment".
All the years RHL/Fedora is used at my work, we was compelled (from time to
time) to even port some future versions/features of N+1 distro to the
current N distro. Because the features required for our "untypical"
environment have appeared somewhere closer to the bleeding-edge...
Sounds like you want Centos + Extras then. Or maybe Extras isn't up to
date enough, and some people may need to create a new 'Current' repo
for Centos.
The closest I've come to wanting something "new" in Centos was wanting
a 2.4.3 (or so) Python instead of the 2.4.2 (or so) that comes with
RHEL/Centos. And that was easily avoided.
--
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
(
www.pembo13.com )