On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com>wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:58:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Ok, I've been getting these messages for a while but I'm not the package
> owner for I didn't worry about it, however, it's been a couple of weeks
so
> I decided to take a look to see how much work it would be.
You are listed as a co-maintainer:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-osmgpsmap
Exactly, I wasn't sure if the owner had a fix in the works so I didn't want
to muck anything up.
Now I'm really confused... There are two separate packages in
Fedora:
> osm-gps-map
> python-osmgpsmap
>
> Both point to the same upstream URL. The description from upstream of
> osm-gps-map says it includes python bindings but there is not currently a
> separate sub-package generated...
>
> So what's the deal? Do one of these packages need to be retired?
No. The wrong %description has been pointed out in the review request.
Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap
tiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982
Blocks: 702103
Bug 702103 - Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for
osm-gps-map GTK+ widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103
More than that, although the description on the upstream site still says
there are python bindings, the whole python directory in the source seems
to have been removed...
Richard