On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:13, Dan Horák dan@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:00 -0800 Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds gets scheduled to run on them. Naively, I'd think that armv7hl should be busy doing builds for "archful" stuff since they're the slowest
I'm not sure why that is. I would expect them to be busy more as well. Do note that we are bringing some more hardware on line after the new year, which should give us more armv7 builders.
builders and there are the fewest of them, except for s390x.
s390x now is a great deal faster. It's often the one that finishes right after x86_64/i686.
even ahead x86_64/i686 sometimes :-)
This is great to hear! Until now s390x was the slowest arch for Java by quite a wide margin; with the special Java 8 JIT package[1] installed, even 32bit arm was quicker than s390x :-o
[1] "java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32" -- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=22627
-- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora