On Tuesday 28 August 2007 1:35:20 pm Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 28.08.2007 05:57, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 15:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
So if you are a EPEL contributor: what do you want? Do you want to elect a EPEL Steering Committee? Do you want a bigger or a smaller one? Do you want to get rid of it?
I'll let my man Chuck D
/me had to visit wikipedia at this point
speak for me: "Power to the people with no delay."
Fedora is evolving, and where? Steering committees don't seem fit the need like they did before.
Agreed, but now and then they (or something like a Steering Committee) are still needed afaics. Especially in EPEL we need some group to send a "This is the direction" signal, as some people want a "Stable EPEL, with a update style similar t othe one from RHEL" while others want a "Extras like, always rolling, always new and shiny" style. Mixing the two models would afaics the worst, so someone needs to pick the site, even if some people feel pissed of.
right now you get extras type rolling release by enabling testing and stable by not. both are covered just fine :)
at least this is my take on it
Dennis