On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 17:42 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 16:48 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
>>>> Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
>>>>> I am glad they are around, but not more and not less.
>>>> It is around becase RHEL is popular, and open source.
>>> And non-free
>> It /is/ free... you pay for support only.
> Wrong. RHEL is opensource, but it is not free. You can't get RHEL
> binaries anywhere.
The complete source in the form of
SRPMs is available in the Red Hat public ftp server.
Did I say something else?
The free
availability of binaries is never a requirement for any of the free and
open source licenses.
This is what RedHat propaganda is telling you.