On Friday 07 August 2009 04:21:56 Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:30 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > OK, bad example, but you know what I mean.
>
> Yes, I do, and I think there is room for a Fedora offering that is
> released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, with
> conservative updates to the platform. That's nearly exactly what we
> have in Fedora Desktop. There is also room for a Fedora offering that
> is released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year,
> with aggressive updates to the latest and greatest for the platform.
> That's nearly exactly what we have in Fedora KDE.
>
> The real problem is going to be when somebody wants to make an offering
> that features GNOME but has aggressive updates to latest and greatest
> GNOME on every update stream, as that cannot coexist with the
> conservative Fedora Desktop.
The other problem is if you'd like stable updates but you prefer KDE, or
vice versa =)
Why do you expect that updating to the latest KDE means unstable system? ;-)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com/