On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design &
> implementation based on "the current composition of an elected board that
> is refreshed in part every six months" is not the sort of situation that
> Fedora would want to be in anyway.
That's a very lame excuse for sticking with an awful desktop environment as
the default just because it is the status quo.
Not excellent...please avoid insulting other people's hard work just
because you are working on something else.