[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

[Nobody]

Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===========================================

19 packages were orphaned
-------------------------
msmtp [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki
     SMTP client
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/msmtp
mysql-connector-c++ [devel] was orphaned by remi
     MySQL database connector for C++
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mysql-connector-c++
PyOpenGL [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki
     Python bindings for OpenGL
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PyOpenGL
openstack-tempo [EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by mdomsch
     OpenStack RESTful API to cron
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openstack-tempo
php-pecl-apc [devel] was orphaned by remi
     APC caches and optimizes PHP intermediate code
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/php-pecl-apc
bpython [EL-6] was orphaned by mdomsch
     Fancy curses interface to the Python interactive interpreter
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bpython
PySolFC-music [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing
     Music for PySolFC
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PySolFC-music
perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by rrati
     A virtual browser that retries errors
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determ...
PySolFC-cardsets [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing
     Various cardsets for PySolFC
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PySolFC-cardsets
libntlm [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki
     NTLM authentication library
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libntlm
lybniz [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing
     A function graph plotter
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/lybniz
PySolFC [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by firewing
     A collection of solitare card games
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/PySolFC
ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion
     A Ruby interface to MySQL
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
mysql-workbench [devel] was orphaned by remi
     A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mysql-workbench
be [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by salimma
     Bugs Everywhere, a distributed bug tracker
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/be
perl-Net-Amazon-S3 [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by rrati
     Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-Amazon-S3
gkrellm-timestamp [devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki
     UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gkrellm-timestamp
libgsasl [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki
     GNU SASL library
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgsasl
firmware-extract [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by mdomsch
     A firmware-tools plugin to add firmware extraction from vendor binaries
     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/firmware-extract

4 packages unorphaned
---------------------
msrb            unorphaned : felix-bundlerepository [f17]
apevec          unorphaned : python-passlib [EL-6]
abompard        unorphaned : python-storm [f18]
strobert        unorphaned : rsnapshot [f18]

3 packages changed owner
------------------------
limb            gave to rjones             : unison240 [EL-6]
limb            gave to gwei3              : jersey [EL-6]
petersen        gave to goldmann           : mimepull [EL-6]

[Peter Lemenkov]

Hello All.

2013/7/8  <nobody(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;:
>  Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
>  ===========================================
>
>  19 packages were orphaned
>  -------------------------
>  msmtp [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki
>       SMTP client
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/msmtp 
I'm using it, so I'm taking this.

>  libgsasl [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki
>       GNU SASL library
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgsasl 
erlang-esasl depends on this so I'll take it.

--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
>  ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion
>        A Ruby interface to MySQL
>        https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
>  
Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in Fedora 
yet, nor it was correctly deprecated.

[Orion Poplawski]

On 07/09/2013 12:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>  Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
> > ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion
> >       A Ruby interface to MySQL
> >       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
> >
>
>  Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in Fedora yet,
>  nor it was correctly deprecated. 
Nothing uses it that I can see.  rubygem-mysql2 is under review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889

and that should be used going forward.

If someone really wants to resurrect this, I would suggest using this:

http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rubygem-mysql-2.9.1-1.fc19.src.rpm

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: [phone]
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion(a)nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 9.7.2013 17:52, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
>  On 07/09/2013 12:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
> >> ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion
> >>       A Ruby interface to MySQL
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
> >>
> >
> > Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in 
> > Fedora yet,
> > nor it was correctly deprecated.
>
>  Nothing uses it that I can see.  
That is like claiming nothing uses Ruby on Rails we ship in Fedora or 
nothing uses LibreOffice

>  rubygem-mysql2 is under review:
>
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
>
>  and that should be used going forward. 
Yes, it is ... but if you suggest that is should be used, it should 
probably obsolete ruby-mysql and that should be coordinated with 
rubygem-mysql2 maintainer. I am not aware of such suggestion.

>  If someone really wants to resurrect this, I would suggest using this:
>
>  http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rubygem-mysql-2.9.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
>  
BTW if you really like to retire ruby-mysql, you should do it properly 
at least, click on "retire package" in pkgdb is not enough. You should 
do step 2 from 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life


Vít

[Orion Poplawski]

On 07/10/2013 11:05 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>  Dne 9.7.2013 17:52, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
> > On 07/09/2013 12:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
> >>> ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion
> >>>       A Ruby interface to MySQL
> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql
> >>>
> >>
> >> Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in
> >> Fedora yet,
> >> nor it was correctly deprecated.
> >
> > Nothing uses it that I can see.
>
>  That is like claiming nothing uses Ruby on Rails we ship in Fedora or
>  nothing uses LibreOffice 
true.  Sorry, I should have announced my intent to orphan/retire before.

> > rubygem-mysql2 is under review:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
> >
> > and that should be used going forward.
>
>  Yes, it is ... but if you suggest that is should be used, it should
>  probably obsolete ruby-mysql and that should be coordinated with
>  rubygem-mysql2 maintainer. I am not aware of such suggestion. 
It is a different api I believe, so it really can't obsolete/provide 
ruby-mysql.

> >
> > If someone really wants to resurrect this, I would suggest using this:
> >
> > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rubygem-mysql-2.9.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
> >
>
>  BTW if you really like to retire ruby-mysql, you should do it properly
>  at least, click on "retire package" in pkgdb is not enough. You should
>  do step 2 from
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
>
>  Vít 
Oops, I had, but forgot to git push.  Too used to fedpkg commit -p I guess.

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: [phone]
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 11.7.2013 16:09, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
>  rubygem-mysql2 is under review:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
> >>
> >> and that should be used going forward.
> >
> > Yes, it is ... but if you suggest that is should be used, it should
> > probably obsolete ruby-mysql and that should be coordinated with
> > rubygem-mysql2 maintainer. I am not aware of such suggestion.
>
>  It is a different api I believe, so it really can't obsolete/provide 
>  ruby-mysql. 
Hmm, that is good point. On the other hand, from my POV, ruby-mysql or 
rubygem-mysql2, both are typically used by ActiveRecord and ActiveRecord 
supports both. This is a bit unfortunate situation :/

Vít

[Till Maas]

On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
>  Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
>  =========================================== 
To whoever is creating these messages:
Please add a message about who is responsible for these reports, where
to report bugs and where the sources of the script can be found.

Thank you
Till

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>  On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
> wrote:
>  > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
>  > ===========================================
>  
>  To whoever is creating these messages: 
That would be me (and infra)

>  Please add a message about who is responsible for these reports,
> where
>  to report bugs  
Sounds good.

>  and where the sources of the script can be found. 
That would be
there:
https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-owner-change

Pierre

[Till Maas]

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote: 
>  > and where the sources of the script can be found.
>  That would be there:
>  https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-owner-change 
Thank you. Have you considered moving this to the fedoraproject
infrastructure github project? See:
https://github.com/fedora-infra

Regards
Till

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>  On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
> wrote:
>  > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
>  > ===========================================
>  
>  To whoever is creating these messages:
>  Please add a message about who is responsible for these reports, where
>  to report bugs and where the sources of the script can be found. 
> From next week the report will have a link to the sources (the git
repo).

Pierre

[Till Maas]

On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
>  Change in ownership over the last 168 hours 
How about changing the report time to to last 48-216 hours, then ongoing
ownership transfers would be recognised as long as they happen within 48
hours.

Regards
Till

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>  On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
> wrote:
>  > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
>  
>  How about changing the report time to to last 48-216 hours, then ongoing
>  ownership transfers would be recognised as long as they happen within 48
>  hours. 
168 hours is a week, so ownership transfer should be picked if they
happen within a week.
You would like to have it down to 48h or up to 216h?

The problem is to not become to spammy while remaining informative, so
we went for 1 week, this can be adjusted of course.

Pierre

[Till Maas]

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>  > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +0000, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
>  > > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
>  > 
>  > How about changing the report time to to last 48-216 hours, then ongoing
>  > ownership transfers would be recognised as long as they happen within 48
>  > hours.
>  
>  168 hours is a week, so ownership transfer should be picked if they
>  happen within a week.
>  You would like to have it down to 48h or up to 216h? 
Actually I was incorrect. I would like it to report orphaned packages in
the time frame from 48 hours ago until 216 hours ago (which is again a
week), but report packages that have been picked up again in between
today to 48 hours ago as transfered from one owner to another.

With the current setup, if a package was orphaned shortly before the
script ran and claimed shortly afterwards, this will not be shown as a
simple transfer but as orphaning and adopting.

It irritated me that mstmp was reported as being orphaned, because I
noticed that its ownership was transfered recently.

Regards
Till