2:11 a.m.
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
Rahul
2:25 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 12:11 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
Rahul
No real reason other than we were already using gitweb-caching elsewhere
in infrastructure and at kernel.org. I have on my todo list to trial
cgit tomorrow.
- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxSflQACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVadQCgr07cknrcq3lOlYo3JzjnZzIK
Y+wAoLq52cgK4ysHZzk9Vv61VUTYRwK8
=eq1H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
6:05 a.m.
we are using cgit in git.ojuba.org and I like it very much.
BTW: why don't we upgrade cgit in fedora repos, cgit-0.8.3.2 was
released a long time ago, it support custom MIME types (the raw view
of png file will not show a text rubbish)
8:31 a.m.
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been completely
trouble-free either, it seems to get stuck sometimes feeding you old
cached data.
If we insist on running gitweb we should at least consider running
warthog's branch (the version that kernel.org uses):
http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=summary
- ajax
8:36 a.m.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
> is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been completely
trouble-free either, it seems to get stuck sometimes feeding you old
cached data.
If we insist on running gitweb we should at least consider running
warthog's branch (the version that kernel.org uses):
http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=summary
We are.
-Mike
8:53 a.m.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
> > is much more faster and resource efficient.
>
> With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been completely
> trouble-free either, it seems to get stuck sometimes feeding you old
> cached data.
>
> If we insist on running gitweb we should at least consider running
> warthog's branch (the version that kernel.org uses):
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=summary
>
We are.
When will this webpage be available? It is being loaded here since
last night. I have been told that the cgi is doing some caching. Any
progress report on this?
Orcan
9:01 a.m.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
>> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
>> > is much more faster and resource efficient.
>>
>> With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been completely
>> trouble-free either, it seems to get stuck sometimes feeding you old
>> cached data.
>>
>> If we insist on running gitweb we should at least consider running
>> warthog's branch (the version that kernel.org uses):
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=summary
>>
>
> We are.
>
When will this webpage be available? It is being loaded here since
last night. I have been told that the cgi is doing some caching. Any
progress report on this?
It is but the massive number of packages seems to be a problem. We'll
figure something out, for now just go to the package you're looking for:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=nagios.git
-Mike
9:09 a.m.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> >> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in
> >> > freedesktop.org is much more faster and resource efficient.
> >>
> >> With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been
> >> completely trouble-free either, it seems to get stuck sometimes
> >> feeding you old cached data.
> >>
> >> If we insist on running gitweb we should at least consider
> >> running warthog's branch (the version that kernel.org uses):
> >>
> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=summary
> >>
> >
> > We are.
> >
>
> When will this webpage be available? It is being loaded here since
> last night. I have been told that the cgi is doing some caching. Any
> progress report on this?
>
It is but the massive number of packages seems to be a problem. We'll
figure something out, for now just go to the package you're looking
for:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=nagios.git
-Mike
Mike can't we just have a statically generated page for the root, and
there have links to the single packages, maybe in subpages divided by
groups, or alphabetically ?
Yes, having the status of the repos on the first page is neat but not
worth killing the server for it.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
9:24 a.m.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> > Hi
> > >> >
> > >> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> > >> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in
> > >> > freedesktop.org is much more faster and resource efficient.
> > >>
> > >> With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been
> > >> completely trouble-free either, it seems to get stuck sometimes
> > >> feeding you old cached data.
> > >>
> > >> If we insist on running gitweb we should at least consider
> > >> running warthog's branch (the version that kernel.org uses):
> > >>
> > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=summary
> > >>
> > >
> > > We are.
> > >
> >
> > When will this webpage be available? It is being loaded here since
> > last night. I have been told that the cgi is doing some caching. Any
> > progress report on this?
> >
>
> It is but the massive number of packages seems to be a problem. We'll
> figure something out, for now just go to the package you're looking
> for:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=nagios.git
>
> -Mike
Mike can't we just have a statically generated page for the root, and
there have links to the single packages, maybe in subpages divided by
groups, or alphabetically ?
Yes, having the status of the repos on the first page is neat but not
worth killing the server for it.
That's one of the options we're looking at, actually one problem right now
is cache isn't actually being generated. We didn't realize this until
people started hitting it (and we had the full package set on there). So
the looking continues. I'll send updates as I get them.
-Mike
3:57 p.m.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > >> > Hi
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> > > >> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in
> > > >> > freedesktop.org is much more faster and resource efficient.
> > > >>
> > > >> With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been
> > > >> completely trouble-free either, it seems to get stuck sometimes
> > > >> feeding you old cached data.
> > > >>
> > > >> If we insist on running gitweb we should at least consider
> > > >> running warthog's branch (the version that kernel.org uses):
> > > >>
> > > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=summary
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > We are.
> > > >
> > >
> > > When will this webpage be available? It is being loaded here since
> > > last night. I have been told that the cgi is doing some caching. Any
> > > progress report on this?
> > >
> >
> > It is but the massive number of packages seems to be a problem. We'll
> > figure something out, for now just go to the package you're looking
> > for:
> >
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=nagios.git
> >
> > -Mike
>
> Mike can't we just have a statically generated page for the root, and
> there have links to the single packages, maybe in subpages divided by
> groups, or alphabetically ?
>
> Yes, having the status of the repos on the first page is neat but not
> worth killing the server for it.
>
That's one of the options we're looking at, actually one problem right now
is cache isn't actually being generated. We didn't realize this until
people started hitting it (and we had the full package set on there). So
the looking continues. I'll send updates as I get them.
K, this is all fixed now. Well figured out at least. Umask issue. I'm
running a chmod now and it should be done soon? An hour? less? We don't
really know but it's running now so at least the going to any specific
package should work.
Once that's done I'm going to re-evaluate the full package list. We'll
have something for that soon.
-Mike
5019
days inactive
5019
days old
9 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Adam Jackson -
Jesse Keating -
Mike McGrath -
Muayyad AlSadi -
Orcan Ogetbil -
Rahul Sundaram -
Simo Sorce