Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
mass rebuild started on side-tag f40-build-side-82977
Best regards,
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
mass rebuild started on side-tag f40-build-side-82977
Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch them .
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-f6619127ec
Best regards,
-- Sérgio M. B. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch them .
mlt is now FTI, do you plan to introduce opencv-compat to resolve that?
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch them .
mlt is now FTI, do you plan to introduce opencv-compat to resolve that?
I'm waiting for the gcc [1] fix, until then I think the best solution is not to update opencv.
Best regards,
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch them .
mlt is now FTI, do you plan to introduce opencv-compat to resolve that?
I'm waiting for the gcc [1] fix, until then I think the best solution is not to update opencv.
Best regards,
Sure, wfm, I'll just keep in mind to rebuild krita then which will get doube-FTI'd after merging libjpeg-turbo (it currently is because of mlt too).
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 16:06 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch them .
mlt is now FTI, do you plan to introduce opencv-compat to resolve that?
I'm waiting for the gcc [1] fix, until then I think the best solution is not to update opencv.
Best regards,
Sure, wfm, I'll just keep in mind to rebuild krita then which will get doube-FTI'd after merging libjpeg-turbo (it currently is because of mlt too).
MLT built [1] (with one workaround for GCC for x86_64).
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7b5199d4f6
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:16 AM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
MLT built [1] (with one workaround for GCC for x86_64).
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7b5199d4f6
Thanks a lot, krita rebuilt: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-324af7694e
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
mass rebuild started on side-tag f40-build-side-82977
Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch them .
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-f6619127ec
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free was missed from this rebuild, which I just discovered thanks to an FTI bug. I have kicked off a new build, but next time, please make sure you have a complete and current list of reverse dependencies.
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:30 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
mass rebuild started on side-tag f40-build-side-82977
Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch them .
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-f6619127ec
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free was missed from this rebuild, which I just discovered thanks to an FTI bug. I have kicked off a new build, but next time, please make sure you have a complete and current list of reverse dependencies.
OK, thanks, I did the check and also miss the caffe package , I'm kicking the build now .
Best regards,
-
Frantisek Zatloukal -
Sérgio Basto -
Yaakov Selkowitz