----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
There actually already *is* a review point
prior to moving to -updates, but it's currently owned by rel-eng and
is
not highly publicized, and very little gets rejected. It is there,
though: rel-eng explained this earlier in the threads, and explained
that they are unhappy with it being informal. I'm trying to find the
post, but there's just too much to wade through, sorry :(
"Why Fedora needs an Updates Policy" from Josh Boyer:
http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/36737.html
That's why we need some defined process. That's why we need
to improve current practice. That's why all those proposals
appear.