Kernel 2.6.34 for F13?

[Reindl Harald]

Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?

My question is because there were also some > 2.6.30 builds for
F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373

I see this two builds in my test-vm form "updates-testing"
kernel-2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
kernel-2.6.34.2-34.fc13.x86_64

-- 

Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
software-development / cms-solutions
p: [phone], m: [phone]
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/

[M A Young]

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Reindl Harald wrote:

>  Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>
>  My question is because there were also some > 2.6.30 builds for
>  F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
>  in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
>
>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
>
>  I see this two builds in my test-vm form "updates-testing"
>  kernel-2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
>  kernel-2.6.34.2-34.fc13.x86_64 
At this stage I imagine the only answer you will get is that it might do. 
As there are 2.6.34 builds in koji the kernel team are clearly 
investigating the possibility of switching to 2.6.34, and if they can get 
it to work as well as or better than the current 2.6.33 kernels and it 
passes QA then they are likely to move to it.
As Fedora 13 is going to be supported for another 9 months or so, it is 
likely that the change will be made at some point.

 	Michael Young

[Filipe Rosset]

Em 20-08-2010 08:56, M A Young escreveu:
>  On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
> >
> > My question is because there were also some>  2.6.30 builds for
> > F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
> > in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
> >
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
> >
> > I see this two builds in my test-vm form "updates-testing"
> > kernel-2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
> > kernel-2.6.34.2-34.fc13.x86_64
>
>  At this stage I imagine the only answer you will get is that it might do.
>  As there are 2.6.34 builds in koji the kernel team are clearly
>  investigating the possibility of switching to 2.6.34, and if they can get
>  it to work as well as or better than the current 2.6.33 kernels and it
>  passes QA then they are likely to move to it.
>  As Fedora 13 is going to be supported for another 9 months or so, it is
>  likely that the change will be made at some point.
>
>    	Michael Young 
For now, 2.6.34.3-37.fc13.x86_64 is OK for me, suspend/hibernate, sound, 
KVM works like a charm!

-- 
Filipe
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

[Rodd Clarkson]

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Filipe Rosset <rosset.filipe(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote:

>  Em 20-08-2010 08:56, M A Young escreveu:
>  > On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Reindl Harald wrote:
>  >
>  >> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>
>
>  For now, 2.6.34.3-37.fc13.x86_64 is OK for me, suspend/hibernate, sound,
>  KVM works like a charm!
>
>  Still not any good from me.  I tried 2.6.34.4-42.fc13.x86_64 

Rodd

[Matthias Runge]

On 20/08/10 03:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
>  Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>
>  My question is because there were also some>  2.6.30 builds for
>  F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
>  in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
>
>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
>
>  I see this two builds in my test-vm form "updates-testing"
>  kernel-2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
>  kernel-2.6.34.2-34.fc13.x86_64
>
>  
There are some regressions in 2.6.34.2-.... I would prefer, that they're 
getting solved before it is shipped.
One regression is e.g. a hard lockup during suspend.
c.f. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.34.3-37.fc13

I've seen additional random lockups during daily use, as another tester 
reported.

Matthias

[Michał Piotrowski]

Hi,

2010/8/20 Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de&gt;:
>  On 20/08/10 03:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
> >
> > My question is because there were also some>  2.6.30 builds for
> > F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
> > in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
> >
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
> >
> > I see this two builds in my test-vm form "updates-testing"
> > kernel-2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
> > kernel-2.6.34.2-34.fc13.x86_64
> >
> >
>  There are some regressions in 2.6.34.2-.... I would prefer, that they're
>  getting solved before it is shipped. 
2.6.34.4 solved some memory corruption problems after resume. 2.6.34.5
was released a few minutes ago, but the problem is that it is probably
the last supported 2.6.34 kernel.

I'm using 2.6.35.2-8.fc13.x86_64 on my home system. It works fine.

>  One regression is e.g. a hard lockup during suspend.
>  c.f. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.34.3-37.fc13
>
>  I've seen additional random lockups during daily use, as another tester
>  reported.
>
>  Matthias
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  
Regards,
M