Frozen for Fedora 8 Test1

[Jesse Keating]

We have frozen for Fedora 8 Test 1.  A "freeze" tag exists, 'f8-test1'
that is a container for the packages that are destined to be in Test1
(and rawhide until test1 is fully composed and released to mirrors).
As per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/Overview ,
builds from devel/ will continue to be tagged with 'dist-f8' and will
be picked up by rawhide composes once the freeze is over.  If you feel
you must have your build in Test1 and it isn't already tagged with
'f8-test1', please follow
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/DevelFreezePolicy

If you wish to help us get to Test1, please follow
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/8/Test1TreeTesting

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

_______________________________________________
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

[Frank Schmitt]

Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com&gt; writes:

>  We have frozen for Fedora 8 Test 1.  A "freeze" tag exists,
> 'f8-test1'
>  that is a container for the packages that are destined to be in Test1
>  (and rawhide until test1 is fully composed and released to mirrors). 
I guess that means yet another release with broken zsh when the fix
would be just updating the package to upstream, as upstream developers
recommend.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183557
http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2007/msg00471.html

I mean OpenSuse and Ubuntu think zsh 4.3.x it's good enough for their
release, not to mention that even Debian includes 4.3 in their *stable*
release. Only the fedora maintainer sticks to 4.2 leaving everyone who
is using a UTF-8 locale with a broken shell.

This is just ridiculous.

-- 
Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider
that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough
space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize
this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bullshit nobody will read.

[Christopher Brown]

On 25/07/07, Frank Schmitt <ich(a)frank-schmitt.net&gt; wrote:
>  Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com&gt; writes:
>
>  > We have frozen for Fedora 8 Test 1.  A "freeze" tag exists,
> 'f8-test1'
>  > that is a container for the packages that are destined to be in Test1
>  > (and rawhide until test1 is fully composed and released to mirrors).
>
>  I guess that means yet another release with broken zsh when the fix
>  would be just updating the package to upstream, as upstream developers
>  recommend. 
No, because as Matthias pointed out in the the bug release below it is
not included in the default install. There's a chance that given the
comments made by the development team the maintainer will re-consider
upgrading to this release.

>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183557
>  http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2007/msg00471.html
>
>  I mean OpenSuse and Ubuntu think zsh 4.3.x it's good enough for their
>  release, not to mention that even Debian includes 4.3 in their *stable*
>  release. Only the fedora maintainer sticks to 4.2 leaving everyone who
>  is using a UTF-8 locale with a broken shell.
>
>  This is just ridiculous. 
No, its a technical decision not to ship an unstable release. That
said, Fedora *is* supposed to be cutting edge stuff and if the only
argument against version bumping is upstream's versioning system
(since dismissed on their mailing list) I agree that its high time to
up the game a little. :)

Regards
Chris

-- 
http://www.chruz.com

[Till Maas]

On Wednesday 25 July 2007 04:33:14 Jesse Keating wrote:

>  We have frozen for Fedora 8 Test 1.  A "freeze" tag exists,
> 'f8-test1' 
cryptsetup-luks before F7 was built statically and beginning in Rawhide it is 
built dynamically. The problem is that it needs some libs, that are currently 
in /usr/lib. This will break systems, where /usr is encrypted and afaik 
blocks the encrypted rootfs feature that is planned for F8. Now I want to 
file bugs against the following packages to move the regarding libs to /lib, 
does this interfer with the freeze or can this happen without any problems?

/usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11 -> libgcrypt
/usr/lib/libpopt.so.0 -> popt (rpm)
/usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 -> libgpg-error

Regards,
Till

[Till Maas]

On Friday 27 July 2007 10:31:10 Till Maas wrote:

>  cryptsetup-luks before F7 was built statically and beginning in
> Rawhide it
>  is built dynamically. The problem is that it needs some libs, that are 
Here ist the coresponding bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/243228

Regards,
Till

[Florian La Roche]

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:46:36AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>  On Friday 27 July 2007 10:31:10 Till Maas wrote:
>  
>  > cryptsetup-luks before F7 was built statically and beginning in Rawhide it
>  > is built dynamically. The problem is that it needs some libs, that are
>  
>  Here ist the coresponding bug report:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/243228 
This should be cloned for all the different rpm packages and also
put on F8Target.

regards,

Florian La Roche

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:33:14 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:

>  We have frozen for Fedora 8 Test 1.  A "freeze" tag exists,
> 'f8-test1'
>  that is a container for the packages that are destined to be in Test1
>  (and rawhide until test1 is fully composed and released to mirrors).
>  As per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/Overview ,
>  builds from devel/ will continue to be tagged with 'dist-f8' and will
>  be picked up by rawhide composes once the freeze is over.  If you feel
>  you must have your build in Test1 and it isn't already tagged with
>  'f8-test1', please follow
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/DevelFreezePolicy 
This doesn't match the DevelFreezePolicy page.

    Note that ignoring the freeze process can lead to your package not
    getting tagged for the freeze tag, and thus not pushed to rawhide and
    the final release.

What is the "final release" here? F8 Test1 final? Or F8 final?

Packagers must mail rel-eng and ask for a package to be tagged "f8-test1"
if they want the package to be included in F8 Test 1. But if they don't,
the package would appear in Rawhide after the freeze and hence would
enter f8-test2, and so on, and F8 final *automatically*.

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:39:46 +0200
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam(a)arcor.de&gt; wrote:

>  This doesn't match the DevelFreezePolicy page.
>  
>      Note that ignoring the freeze process can lead to your package not
>      getting tagged for the freeze tag, and thus not pushed to rawhide
>  and the final release.
>  
>  What is the "final release" here? F8 Test1 final? Or F8 final?
>  
>  Packagers must mail rel-eng and ask for a package to be tagged
>  "f8-test1" if they want the package to be included in F8 Test 1. But
>  if they don't, the package would appear in Rawhide after the freeze
>  and hence would enter f8-test2, and so on, and F8 final
>  *automatically*. 
Thank you for pointing out this unclarity.  This page has existed for a
while, would have bee nice to get feedback before.  I'll adjust.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:48:14 -0400
Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Thank you for pointing out this unclarity.  This page has existed
> for
>  a while, would have bee nice to get feedback before.  I'll adjust. 
Actually I see that we probably need another policy page, one
specifically for test releases.  I'll work on that today.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

[Jeremy Katz]

On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 10:31 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>  On Wednesday 25 July 2007 04:33:14 Jesse Keating wrote:
>  > We have frozen for Fedora 8 Test 1.  A "freeze" tag exists,
> 'f8-test1'
>  
>  cryptsetup-luks before F7 was built statically and beginning in Rawhide it is 
>  built dynamically. The problem is that it needs some libs, that are currently 
>  in /usr/lib. This will break systems, where /usr is encrypted  
Yes, the libs probably need moving...

>  and afaik blocks the encrypted rootfs feature that is planned for F8.
>  
The initramfs uses dynamically linked binaries these days and will grab
the libraries from wherever they are.

>  Now I want to 
>  file bugs against the following packages to move the regarding libs to /lib, 
>  does this interfer with the freeze or can this happen without any problems? 
I suspect that we won't be able to get them fixed for test1 purely due
to timing (although if they get built early today, there's a slight
chance).  But having a caveat of "you can only test this if you don't
have a separate /usr" isn't terrible for test1.  Especially as the rest
of the support also requires changes which aren't in packages yet...

Jeremy

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com&gt; said:
>  If you wish to help us get to Test1, please follow
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/8/Test1TreeTesting 
Okay, I was going to give this a try, but there doesn't appear to be an
installable tree available.  Both i386 and x86_64 are missing the images
directory, so there's no kernel, initrd, etc.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net&gt;
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net&gt; said:
>  Okay, I was going to give this a try, but there doesn't appear to
> be an
>  installable tree available. 
Never mind, I see this afternoon's push.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net&gt;
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.