iwlwifi-firmware

[drago01]

The iwlwifi-firmware package only contains the ucode image for iwl3945 but
not 4945.
should I file a bug against iwlwifi-firmware or should this be a different
package?
upstream calls them:
iwlwifi-3945-ucode
and
iwlwifi.4945-ucode

[Jeremy Katz]

On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:54 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>  The iwlwifi-firmware package only contains the ucode image for
> iwl3945
>  but not 4945.
>  should I file a bug against iwlwifi-firmware or should this be a
>  different package?
>  upstream calls them:
>  iwlwifi-3945-ucode
>  and 
>  iwlwifi.4945-ucode 
Probably a different package.  And now that F7's out the door, it's
probably a good time to get the 3945 firmware package renamed for the
devel tree.  They just changed the naming upstream right before final
freeze, so we wanted to put it off a smidge

Jeremy

[Xavier Lamien]

It's more apropriate to have differente package instead have on package for
all. that  could avoid to install unused files or make able to remove unused
files.
So this package should be named as follow:
iwl-3945-firmware
iwl-4945-firmware

2007/6/9, Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com&gt;:
>  On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:54 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>  > The iwlwifi-firmware package only contains the ucode image for iwl3945
>  > but not 4945.
>  > should I file a bug against iwlwifi-firmware or should this be a
>  > different package?
>  > upstream calls them:
>  > iwlwifi-3945-ucode
>  > and
>  > iwlwifi.4945-ucode
>
>  Probably a different package.  And now that F7's out the door, it's
>  probably a good time to get the 3945 firmware package renamed for the
>  devel tree. 

+1

They just changed the naming upstream right before final
>  freeze, so we wanted to put it off a smidge
>
>  Jeremy
>
>  --
>  fedora-devel-list mailing list
>  fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>  


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
French Fedora Ambassador
Fedora Extras Contributor
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

[drago01]

On 6/9/07, Xavier Lamien <laxathom(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  It's more apropriate to have differente package instead have on package
>  for all. that  could avoid to install unused files or make able to remove
>  unused files.
>  So this package should be named as follow:
>  iwl-3945-firmware
>  iwl-4945-firmware 

ok, agreed... but I would prefer iwlwifi over iwl (to match upstream)