List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

[Miro Hrončok]

Dear maintainers.

Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 
2022).

Policy: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...

The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35.

This report is based on dist tags.

Packages collected via:
https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...

If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me 
know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.

If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.

          Package                       (co)maintainers
=========================================================================
golang-grpc-go4                      eclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup
lancer                               willb
php-aws-sdk3                         lcts
php-pimple                           lcts
recorder                             ddd
rubygem-coffee-rails                 jaruga, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch
rubygem-minitest-reporters           pvalena
rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
tinygo                               go-sig, qulogic
uom-parent                           lberk, mgoodwin, nathans
xs                                   petersen


The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: golang-grpc-go4 (1)
	golang-x-build (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup)
		golang-x-build-0-0.19.20201229git0a4bf69.fc35.src requires 
golang(grpc.go4.org) = 0-0.9.20180421git11d0a25.fc34, 
golang(grpc.go4.org/codes) = 0-0.9.20180421git11d0a25.fc34
		golang-x-build-devel-0-0.19.20201229git0a4bf69.fc35.noarch requires 
golang(grpc.go4.org) = 0-0.9.20180421git11d0a25.fc34, 
golang(grpc.go4.org/codes) = 0-0.9.20180421git11d0a25.fc34

Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
	rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
		rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 
3.2.2

	rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
		rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 
3.2.2

	rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
		rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2

	rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
		rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
		rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2

	rubygem-rails (maintained by: jstribny, kanarip, mmorsi, mtasaka, pvalena, 
ruby-packagers-sig, sseago, tdawson, vondruch)
		rubygem-rails-1:7.0.2.3-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(actionmailbox) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-rspec-rails (maintained by: clalance, vondruch)
		rubygem-rspec-rails-5.1.1-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(actionmailbox) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-actiontext (maintained by: pvalena)
		rubygem-actiontext-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(activestorage) = 
7.0.2.3
		rubygem-actiontext-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(activestorage) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-actionpack (maintained by: jaruga, jstribny, kanarip, mmorsi, pvalena, 
ruby-packagers-sig, sseago, vondruch)
		rubygem-actionpack-1:7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-actionview (maintained by: jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig)
		rubygem-actionview-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-activemodel (maintained by: jstribny, mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
		rubygem-activemodel-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-ammeter (maintained by: jstribny, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
		rubygem-ammeter-1.1.5-3.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
		rubygem-ammeter-1.1.5-3.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-font-awesome-rails (maintained by: abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 
fale, snecker)
		rubygem-font-awesome-rails-4.7.0.8-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 
7.0.2.3
		rubygem-font-awesome-rails-4.7.0.8-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 
7.0.2.3

	rubygem-generator_spec (maintained by: ilgrad)
		rubygem-generator_spec-0.9.4-12.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
		rubygem-generator_spec-0.9.4-12.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-globalid (maintained by: jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig)
		rubygem-globalid-1.0.0-3.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-haml (maintained by: kanarip, pvalena)
		rubygem-haml-5.2.2-3.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-importmap-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
		rubygem-importmap-rails-1.0.3-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-jbuilder (maintained by: pvalena, vondruch)
		rubygem-jbuilder-2.11.5-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-jquery-rails (maintained by: jstribny, tdawson, vondruch)
		rubygem-jquery-rails-4.4.0-3.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-rails-controller-testing (maintained by: valtri)
		rubygem-rails-controller-testing-1.0.5-6.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) 
= 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap (maintained by: tdawson)
		rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap-2.3.0-16.fc37.noarch requires 
rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-slim (maintained by: vondruch)
		rubygem-slim-4.1.0-6.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	rubygem-web-console (maintained by: jaruga, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
		rubygem-web-console-4.1.0-4.fc36.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
		rubygem-web-console-4.1.0-4.fc36.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3

	Too many dependencies for rubygem-sprockets-rails, not all listed here


Affected (co)maintainers (directly and indirectly):
abradshaw: rubygem-sprockets-rails
ckyriakidou: rubygem-sprockets-rails
clalance: rubygem-sprockets-rails
ddd: recorder
eclipseo: golang-grpc-go4
evgeni: rubygem-sprockets-rails
fale: rubygem-sprockets-rails
go-sig: golang-grpc-go4, tinygo
ilgrad: rubygem-sprockets-rails
jaruga: rubygem-sprockets-rails, rubygem-coffee-rails
jchaloup: golang-grpc-go4
jstribny: rubygem-sprockets-rails
kanarip: rubygem-sprockets-rails
lberk: uom-parent
lcts: php-aws-sdk3, php-pimple
mgoodwin: uom-parent
mmorsi: rubygem-sprockets-rails
mtasaka: rubygem-sprockets-rails
nathans: uom-parent
petersen: xs
pvalena: rubygem-sprockets-rails, rubygem-minitest-reporters
qulogic: tinygo
ruby-packagers-sig: rubygem-sprockets-rails, rubygem-coffee-rails
snecker: rubygem-sprockets-rails
sseago: rubygem-sprockets-rails
tdawson: rubygem-sprockets-rails
valtri: rubygem-sprockets-rails
vondruch: rubygem-sprockets-rails, rubygem-coffee-rails
willb: lancer

-- 
Miro Hrončok
-- 
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
>  Dear maintainers.
>  
>  Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
>  will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 2022).
>  
>  Policy:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...
>  
>  The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35.
>  
>  This report is based on dist tags.
>  
>  Packages collected via:
>
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
>  
>  If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
>  If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we
> can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
>  
>  If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
>  
>            Package                       (co)maintainers
>  =========================================================================
>  rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
>  
>  Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
>       rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
>           rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) =
> 3.2.2
>  
>       rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
>           rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) =
> 3.2.2
>  
>       rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
>           rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
>  
>       rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
>           rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) =
> 3.2.2
>           rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
>  
>       rubygem-rails (maintained by: jstribny, kanarip, mmorsi, mtasaka, pvalena,
> ruby-packagers-sig, sseago, tdawson, vondruch)
>           rubygem-rails-1:7.0.2.3-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(actionmailbox) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-rspec-rails (maintained by: clalance, vondruch)
>           rubygem-rspec-rails-5.1.1-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(actionmailbox) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-actiontext (maintained by: pvalena)
>           rubygem-actiontext-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(activestorage) =
> 7.0.2.3
>           rubygem-actiontext-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(activestorage) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-actionpack (maintained by: jaruga, jstribny, kanarip, mmorsi, pvalena,
> ruby-packagers-sig, sseago, vondruch)
>           rubygem-actionpack-1:7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-actionview (maintained by: jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig)
>           rubygem-actionview-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-activemodel (maintained by: jstribny, mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
>           rubygem-activemodel-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-ammeter (maintained by: jstribny, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
>           rubygem-ammeter-1.1.5-3.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>           rubygem-ammeter-1.1.5-3.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-font-awesome-rails (maintained by: abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, fale,
> snecker)
>           rubygem-font-awesome-rails-4.7.0.8-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) =
> 7.0.2.3
>           rubygem-font-awesome-rails-4.7.0.8-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) =
> 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-generator_spec (maintained by: ilgrad)
>           rubygem-generator_spec-0.9.4-12.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) =
> 7.0.2.3
>           rubygem-generator_spec-0.9.4-12.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-globalid (maintained by: jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig)
>           rubygem-globalid-1.0.0-3.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-haml (maintained by: kanarip, pvalena)
>           rubygem-haml-5.2.2-3.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-importmap-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
>           rubygem-importmap-rails-1.0.3-2.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) =
> 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-jbuilder (maintained by: pvalena, vondruch)
>           rubygem-jbuilder-2.11.5-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-jquery-rails (maintained by: jstribny, tdawson, vondruch)
>           rubygem-jquery-rails-4.4.0-3.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-rails-controller-testing (maintained by: valtri)
>           rubygem-rails-controller-testing-1.0.5-6.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) =
> 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap (maintained by: tdawson)
>           rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap-2.3.0-16.fc37.noarch requires rubygem(railties) =
> 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-slim (maintained by: vondruch)
>           rubygem-slim-4.1.0-6.fc37.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       rubygem-web-console (maintained by: jaruga, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
>           rubygem-web-console-4.1.0-4.fc36.noarch requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>           rubygem-web-console-4.1.0-4.fc36.src requires rubygem(railties) = 7.0.2.3
>  
>       Too many dependencies for rubygem-sprockets-rails, not all listed here
>   
Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
the previous report one week ago?

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...

The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on rubygem-sprockets-rails,
but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails.

Regards,
Mamoru

[Miro Hrončok]

On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>  Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
> > Dear maintainers.
> >
> > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> > will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching 
> > (August 2022).
> >
> > Policy: 
> >
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... 
> >
> >
> > The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35.
> >
> > This report is based on dist tags.
> >
> > Packages collected via:
> >
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
>
> >
> >
> > If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me 
> > know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
> >
> > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
> >
> >           Package                       (co)maintainers
> > =========================================================================
> > rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
> >
> > Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
> >      rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
> >          rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >
> >      rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
> >          rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires 
> > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >
> >      rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
> >          rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >
> >      rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
> >          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires 
> > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires 
> > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> > ...
> >
>  
>  Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
>  the previous report one week ago?
>  
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...
>
>  
>  
>  The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on 
>  rubygem-sprockets-rails,
>  but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails. 
Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails):

rubygem-actionmailbox
     rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src

rubygem-activestorage
     rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src

rubygem-railties
     rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src

rubygem-sassc-rails
     rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch
     rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src


I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did.

I've repoqueried this compose 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-2022071... 
and it seems that the requirements were there.

The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was part of the 
FTBFS packages set before and its dep tree already included those packages, so 
the script decided not to report them twice :(

https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans...

When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the list of 
FTBFS packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies reported.

I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous.

And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails this 
round, I am OK with that.

Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be affected 
by this now.

-- 
Miro Hrončok
-- 
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

[Miro Hrončok]

On 26. 07. 22 15:40, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>  On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
> >> Dear maintainers.
> >>
> >> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> >> will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching 
> >> (August 2022).
> >>
> >> Policy: 
> >>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... 
> >>
> >>
> >> The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35.
> >>
> >> This report is based on dist tags.
> >>
> >> Packages collected via:
> >>
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> >> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me 
> >> know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
> >>
> >> If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
> >>
> >>           Package                       (co)maintainers
> >> =========================================================================
> >> rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
> >>
> >> Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
> >>      rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
> >>          rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> >> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>
> >>      rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
> >>          rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires 
> >> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>
> >>      rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
> >>          rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> >> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>
> >>      rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
> >>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires 
> >> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires 
> >> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >> ...
> >>
> >
> > Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
> > the previous report one week ago?
> >
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...
>
> >
> >
> > The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on 
> > rubygem-sprockets-rails,
> > but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails.
>  
>  Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails):
>  
>  rubygem-actionmailbox
>       rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
>  
>  rubygem-activestorage
>       rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src
>  
>  rubygem-railties
>       rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
>  
>  rubygem-sassc-rails
>       rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch
>       rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src
>  
>  
>  I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did.
>  
>  I've repoqueried this compose 
>  https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-2022071... 
>  and it seems that the requirements were there.
>  
>  The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was part of the 
>  FTBFS packages set before and its dep tree already included those packages, so 
>  the script decided not to report them twice :(
>  
>  https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans...
>  
>  When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the list of 
>  FTBFS packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies reported.
>  
>  I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous.
>  
>  And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails this 
>  round, I am OK with that.
>  
>  Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be affected 
>  by this now. 
https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/10924

-- 
Miro Hrončok
-- 
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40:
>  On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
> >> Dear maintainers.
> >>
> >> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> >> will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August
> 2022).
> >>
> >> Policy:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...
> >>
> >> The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35.
> >>
> >> This report is based on dist tags.
> >>
> >> Packages collected via:
> >>
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
> >>
> >> If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> >> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know
> and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
> >>
> >> If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
> >>
> >>           Package                       (co)maintainers
> >> =========================================================================
> >> rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
> >>
> >> Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
> >>      rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
> >>          rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires
> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>
> >>      rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
> >>          rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires
> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>
> >>      rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
> >>          rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) =
> 3.2.2
> >>
> >>      rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
> >>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires
> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) =
> 3.2.2
> >> ...
> >>
> >
> > Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
> > the previous report one week ago?
> >
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...
> >
> > The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on
> rubygem-sprockets-rails,
> > but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails.
>  
>  Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails):
>  
>  rubygem-actionmailbox
>       rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
>  
>  rubygem-activestorage
>       rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src
>  
>  rubygem-railties
>       rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
>  
>  rubygem-sassc-rails
>       rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch
>       rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src
>  
>  
>  I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did.
>  
>  I've repoqueried this compose
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-2022071... and it
> seems that the requirements were there.
>  
>  The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was part of the FTBFS
> packages set before and its dep tree already included those packages, so the script
> decided not to report them twice :(
>  
>  https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans...
>  
>  When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the list of FTBFS
> packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies reported.
>  
>  I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous.
>  
>  And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails this round, I am OK
> with that.
>  
>  Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be affected by this
> now.
>   
Okay, thank you for confirmation.

Anyway now I checked the upstream repo and the upstream already fixed build issue.
So I've backported the upstream fix and now build was successful as
rubygem-sprockets-rails-3.2.2-6.fc37 .

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2036386

Regards,
Mamoru

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 26. 07. 22 v 17:00 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>  Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40:
> > On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> >> Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
> >>> Dear maintainers.
> >>>
> >>> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the 
> >>> following packages
> >>> will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before 
> >>> branching (August 2022).
> >>>
> >>> Policy: 
> >>>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...
> >>>
> >>> The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since 
> >>> Fedora 35.
> >>>
> >>> This report is based on dist tags.
> >>>
> >>> Packages collected via:
> >>>
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> >>> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, 
> >>> please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval 
> >>> for that.
> >>>
> >>> If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
> >>>
> >>>           Package                       (co)maintainers
> >>> ========================================================================= 
> >>>
> >>> rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, 
> >>> ruby-packagers-sig
> >>>
> >>> Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
> >>>      rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
> >>>          rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> >>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>>
> >>>      rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, 
> >>> vondruch)
> >>>          rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires 
> >>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>>
> >>>      rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, 
> >>> vondruch)
> >>>          rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> >>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>>
> >>>      rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
> >>>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires 
> >>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires 
> >>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
> >> the previous report one week ago?
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...
>
> >>
> >>
> >> The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on 
> >> rubygem-sprockets-rails,
> >> but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails.
> >
> > Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails):
> >
> > rubygem-actionmailbox
> >      rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
> >
> > rubygem-activestorage
> >      rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src
> >
> > rubygem-railties
> >      rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
> >
> > rubygem-sassc-rails
> >      rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch
> >      rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src
> >
> >
> > I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did.
> >
> > I've repoqueried this compose 
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-2022071... 
> > and it seems that the requirements were there.
> >
> > The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was 
> > part of the FTBFS packages set before and its dep tree already 
> > included those packages, so the script decided not to report them 
> > twice :(
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans... 
> >
> >
> > When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the 
> > list of FTBFS packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies 
> > reported.
> >
> > I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous.
> >
> > And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails 
> > this round, I am OK with that.
> >
> > Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be 
> > affected by this now.
> >
>
>  Okay, thank you for confirmation.
>
>  Anyway now I checked the upstream repo and the upstream already fixed 
>  build issue.
>  So I've backported the upstream fix and now build was successful as
>  rubygem-sprockets-rails-3.2.2-6.fc37 .
>
>  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2036386
>  

Thx a lot for fixing those. I appreciate that.


Vít


>  Regards,
>  Mamoru
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives: 
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>

[Pavel Valena]

Yes, thank you very much!

Pavel

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 4:00 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Dne 26. 07. 22 v 17:00 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>  > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40:
>  >> On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>  >>> Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
>  >>>> Dear maintainers.
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the
>  >>>> following packages
>  >>>> will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before
>  >>>> branching (August 2022).
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Policy:
>  >>>>
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...
>  >>>>
>  >>>> The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since
>  >>>> Fedora 35.
>  >>>>
>  >>>> This report is based on dist tags.
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Packages collected via:
>  >>>>
>
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>> If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
>  >>>> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process,
>  >>>> please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval
>  >>>> for that.
>  >>>>
>  >>>> If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>           Package                       (co)maintainers
>  >>>>
>  =========================================================================
>  >>>>
>  >>>> rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena,
>  >>>> ruby-packagers-sig
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
>  >>>>      rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
>  >>>>          rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires
>  >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
>  >>>>
>  >>>>      rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig,
>  >>>> vondruch)
>  >>>>          rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires
>  >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
>  >>>>
>  >>>>      rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson,
>  >>>> vondruch)
>  >>>>          rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires
>  >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
>  >>>>
>  >>>>      rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
>  >>>>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires
>  >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
>  >>>>          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires
>  >>>> rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
>  >>>> ...
>  >>>>
>  >>>
>  >>> Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
>  >>> the previous report one week ago?
>  >>>
>  >>>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>> The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on
>  >>> rubygem-sprockets-rails,
>  >>> but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails.
>  >>
>  >> Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails):
>  >>
>  >> rubygem-actionmailbox
>  >>      rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
>  >>
>  >> rubygem-activestorage
>  >>      rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src
>  >>
>  >> rubygem-railties
>  >>      rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
>  >>
>  >> rubygem-sassc-rails
>  >>      rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch
>  >>      rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did.
>  >>
>  >> I've repoqueried this compose
>  >>
>  https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-2022071...
>  >> and it seems that the requirements were there.
>  >>
>  >> The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was
>  >> part of the FTBFS packages set before and its dep tree already
>  >> included those packages, so the script decided not to report them
>  >> twice :(
>  >>
>  >>
>  https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans...
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the
>  >> list of FTBFS packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies
>  >> reported.
>  >>
>  >> I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous.
>  >>
>  >> And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails
>  >> this round, I am OK with that.
>  >>
>  >> Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be
>  >> affected by this now.
>  >>
>  >
>  > Okay, thank you for confirmation.
>  >
>  > Anyway now I checked the upstream repo and the upstream already fixed
>  > build issue.
>  > So I've backported the upstream fix and now build was successful as
>  > rubygem-sprockets-rails-3.2.2-6.fc37 .
>  >
>  > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2036386
>
>
>  Thx a lot for fixing those. I appreciate that.
>
>
>  Vít
>
>
>  >
>  > Regards,
>  > Mamoru
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  > Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  > List Archives:
>  >
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>  > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>