libnsl.so.2.0.1 updated to libnsl.so.3.0.0 without coordination, broke rawhide

[Miro Hrončok]

Hello,

Since this update:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec...

Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not installable:

Error:
  Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-libdnf, 
but none of the providers can be installed
   - package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-libdnf >= 
0.65.0, but none of the providers can be installed
   - package dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-dnf = 4.10.0-1.fc36, but 
none of the providers can be installed
   - package python3-libdnf-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires 
libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
   - conflicting requests
   - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
   - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by 
python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
  Problem 2: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch requires 
python3-hawkey >= 0.46.1, but none of the providers can be installed
   - package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch requires 
python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.24-1.fc36, but none of the providers can be 
installed
   - package python3-hawkey-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires 
libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
   - conflicting requests
   - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
   - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by 
python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)


Additionally, the following packages (and everything that depends on them) will 
fail to install:

$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires 'libnsl.so.2()(64bit)'
autofs-1:5.1.8-1.fc36.x86_64
exim-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
exim-mon-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
libnsl2-devel-0:1.3.0-4.fc35.x86_64
nss_nis-0:3.1-9.fc35.x86_64
pam-0:1.5.2-6.fc36.x86_64
postfix-2:3.6.2-6.fc36.x86_64
python2.7-0:2.7.18-15.fc36.x86_64
python3-debug-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
python3-libs-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
python3.11-0:3.11.0~a1-1.fc36.x86_64
python3.6-0:3.6.15-2.fc36.x86_64
python3.7-0:3.7.12-2.fc36.x86_64
python3.8-0:3.8.12-2.fc36.x86_64
python3.9-0:3.9.8-1.fc36.x86_64
rwall-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
rwall-server-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
sendmail-0:8.17.1-2.fc36.x86_64
slapi-nis-0:0.56.7-2.fc35.x86_64
tcp_wrappers-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
tcp_wrappers-libs-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
yp-tools-0:4.2.3-10.fc35.x86_64
ypbind-3:2.7.2-5.fc35.x86_64
ypserv-0:4.2-1.fc36.x86_64

I've requested the package to be untagged:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10380

This change needs to be coordinated.

-- 
Miro Hrončok
-- 
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

[Reon Beon]

Yeah someone should push that to a side package...

[Gary Buhrmaster]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hello,
>
>  Since this update:
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec...
>
>  Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not installable:
>  


Is it possible to automate a scan across
(at least) the "core"(*) packages and
identify those spec files that use one of
the (from the packaging guidelines)
SHOULD NOT unversioned soname
globs and then have explicit major
sonames added(**)?  Of course such a
change will not prevent explicit bumps,
but should, at a minimum, raise the
bar just a bit for accidental bumps
(which is what I presume this was when
the new upstream source was
submitted as an update).



(*) Is there such a list of "core" libraries?
If not, that might need to be another
item on the work queue.

(**) I am presuming that most of the
unversioned soname globs in most
spec files predate the SHOULD NOT
recommendations, and cleaning that
up would be a good thing moving
forward.

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:49:40PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>  On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Miro Hrončok
> <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  >
>  > Hello,
>  >
>  > Since this update:
>  >
>  >
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec...
>  >
>  > Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not installable:
>  >
>  
>  
>   
>  Is it possible to automate a scan across (at least) the
> "core"(*)
>  packages and identify those spec files that use one of the (from the
>  packaging guidelines) SHOULD NOT unversioned soname globs and then
>  have explicit major sonames added(**)?  Of course such a change will
>  not prevent explicit bumps, but should, at a minimum, raise the bar
>  just a bit for accidental bumps (which is what I presume this was
>  when the new upstream source was submitted as an update). 
This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines have
been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think there is a
broad agreement that this is a good thing. Unfortunately many packages
still use this pattern.

I think we need a hero (or a small team of heroes) to
1. download the all-specs.tar.xz file and grep for the any spec files that have globs
2. figure out a list and propose a mass change [2]
3. apply all the changes everywhere

That last step will require provenpackager privs.
I could help a bit, esp. with the last step, if somebody wants to
do this.

[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_share...
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/

Zbyszek

>  (*) Is there such a list of "core" libraries?
>  If not, that might need to be another
>  item on the work queue.
>  
>  (**) I am presuming that most of the
>  unversioned soname globs in most
>  spec files predate the SHOULD NOT
>  recommendations, and cleaning that
>  up would be a good thing moving
>  forward. 
Ah, right, I didn't read the footnote before writing the text above ;)

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 11:57 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>  
>  This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines
>  have
>  been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think there
>  is a
>  broad agreement that this is a good thing. Unfortunately many
>  packages
>  still use this pattern.
>  
>  I think we need a hero (or a small team of heroes) to
>  1. download the all-specs.tar.xz file and grep for the any spec files
>  that have globs 
We should probably have a link to that someplace very visible (e.g. in
the packaging guidelines)?

I just realized I forgot to bookmark it, and I can't remember where to
get it from now.


Cheers,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/[e-mail]

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 10:28:03AM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>  On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 11:57 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>  > 
>  > This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines
>  > have
>  > been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think there
>  > is a
>  > broad agreement that this is a good thing. Unfortunately many
>  > packages
>  > still use this pattern.
>  > 
>  > I think we need a hero (or a small team of heroes) to
>  > 1. download the all-specs.tar.xz file and grep for the any spec files
>  > that have globs
>  
>  We should probably have a link to that someplace very visible (e.g. in
>  the packaging guidelines)? 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/

Zbyszek

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 10:28 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>  On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 11:57 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>  > 
>  > This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines
>  > have
>  > been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think
>  > there
>  > is a
>  > broad agreement that this is a good thing. Unfortunately many
>  > packages
>  > still use this pattern.
>  > 
>  > I think we need a hero (or a small team of heroes) to
>  > 1. download the all-specs.tar.xz file and grep for the any spec
>  > files
>  > that have globs
>  
>  We should probably have a link to that someplace very visible (e.g.
>  in
>  the packaging guidelines)?
>  
>  I just realized I forgot to bookmark it, and I can't remember where
>  to
>  get it from now.
>   
aha, https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/[e-mail]

[Björn 'besser82' Esser]

Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
>  Hello,
>  
>  Since this update:
>  
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec...
>  
>  Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not
>  installable:
>  
>  Error:
>    Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires
>  python3-libdnf, 
>  but none of the providers can be installed
>     - package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-libdnf
>  >= 
>  0.65.0, but none of the providers can be installed
>     - package dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-dnf = 4.10.0-
>  1.fc36, but 
>  none of the providers can be installed
>     - package python3-libdnf-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires 
>  libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
>  installed
>     - conflicting requests
>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
>  python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by 
>  python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>    Problem 2: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch
>  requires 
>  python3-hawkey >= 0.46.1, but none of the providers can be installed
>     - package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch requires 
>  python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.24-1.fc36, but none of the providers
>  can be 
>  installed
>     - package python3-hawkey-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires 
>  libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
>  installed
>     - conflicting requests
>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
>  python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by 
>  python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>  
>  
>  Additionally, the following packages (and everything that depends on
>  them) will 
>  fail to install:
>  
>  $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires 'libnsl.so.2()(64bit)'
>  autofs-1:5.1.8-1.fc36.x86_64
>  exim-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
>  exim-mon-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
>  libnsl2-devel-0:1.3.0-4.fc35.x86_64
>  nss_nis-0:3.1-9.fc35.x86_64
>  pam-0:1.5.2-6.fc36.x86_64
>  postfix-2:3.6.2-6.fc36.x86_64
>  python2.7-0:2.7.18-15.fc36.x86_64
>  python3-debug-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
>  python3-libs-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
>  python3.11-0:3.11.0~a1-1.fc36.x86_64
>  python3.6-0:3.6.15-2.fc36.x86_64
>  python3.7-0:3.7.12-2.fc36.x86_64
>  python3.8-0:3.8.12-2.fc36.x86_64
>  python3.9-0:3.9.8-1.fc36.x86_64
>  rwall-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
>  rwall-server-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
>  sendmail-0:8.17.1-2.fc36.x86_64
>  slapi-nis-0:0.56.7-2.fc35.x86_64
>  tcp_wrappers-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
>  tcp_wrappers-libs-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
>  yp-tools-0:4.2.3-10.fc35.x86_64
>  ypbind-3:2.7.2-5.fc35.x86_64
>  ypserv-0:4.2-1.fc36.x86_64
>  
>  I've requested the package to be untagged:
>  
>  https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10380
>  
>  This change needs to be coordinated. 

I can take care to coordinate the rebuilds in a side-tag, if you don't
mind.

Thanks,
Björn

[Björn 'besser82' Esser]

Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
Esser:
>  Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
>  > Hello,
>  > 
>  > Since this update:
>  > 
>  >
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec...
>  > 
>  > Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not
>  > installable:
>  > 
>  > Error:
>  >   Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires
>  > python3-libdnf, 
>  > but none of the providers can be installed
>  >    - package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-libdnf
>  > > = 
>  > 0.65.0, but none of the providers can be installed
>  >    - package dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-dnf = 4.10.0-
>  > 1.fc36, but 
>  > none of the providers can be installed
>  >    - package python3-libdnf-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires 
>  > libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
>  > installed
>  >    - conflicting requests
>  >    - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
>  > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  >    - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by 
>  > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  >   Problem 2: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch
>  > requires 
>  > python3-hawkey >= 0.46.1, but none of the providers can be installed
>  >    - package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch requires 
>  > python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.24-1.fc36, but none of the providers
>  > can be 
>  > installed
>  >    - package python3-hawkey-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires 
>  > libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
>  > installed
>  >    - conflicting requests
>  >    - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
>  > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  >    - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by 
>  > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Additionally, the following packages (and everything that depends on
>  > them) will 
>  > fail to install:
>  > 
>  > $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires 'libnsl.so.2()(64bit)'
>  > autofs-1:5.1.8-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > exim-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > exim-mon-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > libnsl2-devel-0:1.3.0-4.fc35.x86_64
>  > nss_nis-0:3.1-9.fc35.x86_64
>  > pam-0:1.5.2-6.fc36.x86_64
>  > postfix-2:3.6.2-6.fc36.x86_64
>  > python2.7-0:2.7.18-15.fc36.x86_64
>  > python3-debug-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > python3-libs-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > python3.11-0:3.11.0~a1-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > python3.6-0:3.6.15-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > python3.7-0:3.7.12-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > python3.8-0:3.8.12-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > python3.9-0:3.9.8-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > rwall-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
>  > rwall-server-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
>  > sendmail-0:8.17.1-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > slapi-nis-0:0.56.7-2.fc35.x86_64
>  > tcp_wrappers-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
>  > tcp_wrappers-libs-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
>  > yp-tools-0:4.2.3-10.fc35.x86_64
>  > ypbind-3:2.7.2-5.fc35.x86_64
>  > ypserv-0:4.2-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > 
>  > I've requested the package to be untagged:
>  > 
>  > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10380
>  > 
>  > This change needs to be coordinated.
>  
>  
>  I can take care to coordinate the rebuilds in a side-tag, if you don't
>  mind.
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Björn 

All required rebuilds have finished successfully and the side-tag is
merged with Rawhide.

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bc52d69ab2

[Miro Hrončok]

On 13. 11. 21 11:03, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>  Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn
> 'besser82'
>  Esser:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Since this update:
> >>
> >>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec...
> >>
> >> Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not
> >> installable:
> >>
> >> Error:
> >>    Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires
> >> python3-libdnf,
> >> but none of the providers can be installed
> >>     - package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-libdnf
> >>> =
> >> 0.65.0, but none of the providers can be installed
> >>     - package dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-dnf = 4.10.0-
> >> 1.fc36, but
> >> none of the providers can be installed
> >>     - package python3-libdnf-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires
> >> libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> >> installed
> >>     - conflicting requests
> >>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by
> >> python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
> >>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by
> >> python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
> >>    Problem 2: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch
> >> requires
> >> python3-hawkey >= 0.46.1, but none of the providers can be installed
> >>     - package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch requires
> >> python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.24-1.fc36, but none of the providers
> >> can be
> >> installed
> >>     - package python3-hawkey-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires
> >> libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> >> installed
> >>     - conflicting requests
> >>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by
> >> python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
> >>     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by
> >> python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
> >> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> >>
> >>
> >> Additionally, the following packages (and everything that depends on
> >> them) will
> >> fail to install:
> >>
> >> $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires 'libnsl.so.2()(64bit)'
> >> autofs-1:5.1.8-1.fc36.x86_64
> >> exim-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
> >> exim-mon-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
> >> libnsl2-devel-0:1.3.0-4.fc35.x86_64
> >> nss_nis-0:3.1-9.fc35.x86_64
> >> pam-0:1.5.2-6.fc36.x86_64
> >> postfix-2:3.6.2-6.fc36.x86_64
> >> python2.7-0:2.7.18-15.fc36.x86_64
> >> python3-debug-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
> >> python3-libs-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
> >> python3.11-0:3.11.0~a1-1.fc36.x86_64
> >> python3.6-0:3.6.15-2.fc36.x86_64
> >> python3.7-0:3.7.12-2.fc36.x86_64
> >> python3.8-0:3.8.12-2.fc36.x86_64
> >> python3.9-0:3.9.8-1.fc36.x86_64
> >> rwall-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
> >> rwall-server-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
> >> sendmail-0:8.17.1-2.fc36.x86_64
> >> slapi-nis-0:0.56.7-2.fc35.x86_64
> >> tcp_wrappers-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
> >> tcp_wrappers-libs-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
> >> yp-tools-0:4.2.3-10.fc35.x86_64
> >> ypbind-3:2.7.2-5.fc35.x86_64
> >> ypserv-0:4.2-1.fc36.x86_64
> >>
> >> I've requested the package to be untagged:
> >>
> >> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10380
> >>
> >> This change needs to be coordinated.
> >
> >
> > I can take care to coordinate the rebuilds in a side-tag, if you don't
> > mind.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Björn
>  
>  
>  All required rebuilds have finished successfully and the side-tag is
>  merged with Rawhide.
>  
>  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bc52d69ab2 
Thanks you very much for doing this, Björn, you are awesome!

-- 
Miro Hrončok
-- 
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

[Björn 'besser82' Esser]

Am Dienstag, dem 16.11.2021 um 15:32 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
>  On 13. 11. 21 11:03, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>  > Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
>  > Esser:
>  > > Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
>  > > > Hello,
>  > > > 
>  > > > Since this update:
>  > > > 
>  > > >
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec...
>  > > > 
>  > > > Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not
>  > > > installable:
>  > > > 
>  > > > Error:
>  > > >    Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires
>  > > > python3-libdnf,
>  > > > but none of the providers can be installed
>  > > >     - package python3-dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-
>  > > > libdnf
>  > > > > =
>  > > > 0.65.0, but none of the providers can be installed
>  > > >     - package dnf-4.10.0-1.fc36.noarch requires python3-dnf =
>  > > > 4.10.0-
>  > > > 1.fc36, but
>  > > > none of the providers can be installed
>  > > >     - package python3-libdnf-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires
>  > > > libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
>  > > > installed
>  > > >     - conflicting requests
>  > > >     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by
>  > > > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  > > >     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by
>  > > > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  > > >    Problem 2: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-
>  > > > 1.fc36.noarch
>  > > > requires
>  > > > python3-hawkey >= 0.46.1, but none of the providers can be
>  > > > installed
>  > > >     - package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-1.fc36.noarch requires
>  > > > python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.24-1.fc36, but none of the
>  > > > providers
>  > > > can be
>  > > > installed
>  > > >     - package python3-hawkey-0.65.0-1.fc36.ppc64le requires
>  > > > libpython3.10.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
>  > > > installed
>  > > >     - conflicting requests
>  > > >     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2()(64bit) needed by
>  > > > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  > > >     - nothing provides libnsl.so.2(LIBNSL_1.0)(64bit) needed by
>  > > > python3-libs-3.10.0-3.fc36.ppc64le
>  > > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>  > > > 
>  > > > 
>  > > > Additionally, the following packages (and everything that
>  > > > depends on
>  > > > them) will
>  > > > fail to install:
>  > > > 
>  > > > $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires
>  > > > 'libnsl.so.2()(64bit)'
>  > > > autofs-1:5.1.8-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > exim-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > exim-mon-0:4.95-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > libnsl2-devel-0:1.3.0-4.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > nss_nis-0:3.1-9.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > pam-0:1.5.2-6.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > postfix-2:3.6.2-6.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python2.7-0:2.7.18-15.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python3-debug-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python3-libs-0:3.10.0-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python3.11-0:3.11.0~a1-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python3.6-0:3.6.15-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python3.7-0:3.7.12-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python3.8-0:3.8.12-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > python3.9-0:3.9.8-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > rwall-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > rwall-server-0:0.17-60.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > sendmail-0:8.17.1-2.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > slapi-nis-0:0.56.7-2.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > tcp_wrappers-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > tcp_wrappers-libs-0:7.6-98.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > yp-tools-0:4.2.3-10.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > ypbind-3:2.7.2-5.fc35.x86_64
>  > > > ypserv-0:4.2-1.fc36.x86_64
>  > > > 
>  > > > I've requested the package to be untagged:
>  > > > 
>  > > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10380
>  > > > 
>  > > > This change needs to be coordinated.
>  > > 
>  > > 
>  > > I can take care to coordinate the rebuilds in a side-tag, if you
>  > > don't
>  > > mind.
>  > > 
>  > > Thanks,
>  > > Björn
>  > 
>  > 
>  > All required rebuilds have finished successfully and the side-tag is
>  > merged with Rawhide.
>  > 
>  > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bc52d69ab2
>  
>  Thanks you very much for doing this, Björn, you are awesome! 
You're welcome!  =)