Please unsubscribe me... I forgot my password and can't do it myself...
Thanks. Re: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
----- Original Message ----- From: fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 4:42 AM Subject: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
Send fedora-devel-list mailing list submissions to fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-devel-list-owner@redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-devel-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
- ctrl-c during boot != good (Dax Kelson)
- Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Bill Nottingham)
- Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Richard Hughes)
- Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Pete Graner)
- Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Ian Burrell)
- Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel)
- Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Chris Adams)
- Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel)
- undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' (Orion Poplawski)
- Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Thomas M Steenholdt)
- Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes (Mike Chambers)
- Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. (Bojan Smojver)
- Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Peter Gordon)
- Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Mark Rosenstand)
- Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Gilboa Davara)
- Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 (Matt Domsch)
- Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 (Matt Domsch)
Message: 1 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:32:40 -0600 From: Dax Kelson dax@gurulabs.com Subject: ctrl-c during boot != good To: notting@redhat.com Cc: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 1158946360.18703.24.camel@mentorng.gurulabs.com Content-Type: text/plain
SysVinit-2.86-12
- Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com - 2.86-12
- set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung
services (#184340)
I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting this wrong.
You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can screwup and stop the boot.
I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
Dax Kelson Guru Labs
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:49:41 -0400 From: Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good To: Dax Kelson dax@gurulabs.com Cc: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 20060922174941.GA17495@nostromo.devel.redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dax Kelson (dax@gurulabs.com) said:
SysVinit-2.86-12
- Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com - 2.86-12
- set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung services (#184340)
I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting this wrong.
You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can screwup and stop the boot.
I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt rc.sysinit.
Bill
Message: 3 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:52:14 +0100 From: Richard Hughes hughsient@gmail.com Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 1158947534.26902.1.camel@hughsie-laptop.localdomain Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com wrote:
gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
- Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson alexl@redhat.com - 0.8.1-1.fc6
- Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
- Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb sgrubb@redhat.com 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
- Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
Anyone else getting this:
(1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB 00:09 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror. (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB 00:00 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
Known issue? Thanks.
Richard.
Message: 4 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:50:14 -0400 From: Pete Graner pgraner@redhat.com Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes To: richard@hughsie.com, Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 45143066.2060205@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Richard Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com wrote:
gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
- Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson alexl@redhat.com - 0.8.1-1.fc6
- Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
- Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb sgrubb@redhat.com 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
- Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
Anyone else getting this:
(1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB 00:09 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror. (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB 00:00 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
Known issue? Thanks.
Richard.
Same here. Started last night.
Pete
Pete Graner email: pgraner@redhat.com
Message: 5 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:38:44 -0700 From: "Ian Burrell" ianburrell@gmail.com Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: d91f09cd0609221238x36beaa28yb184b6ebb8a9a646@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 9/22/06, Thomas M Steenholdt tmus@tmus.dk wrote:
It would be really nice if there were some good, universal and simple way to see how updated a site mirror is.
One approach that I find to be working well is what debian is suggesting for their mirrors ( http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror ). Not only does this "trace method" provide info on when the mirror was last sync'ed, it also shows the "route" of the mirroring, i.e. what mirror this mirror mirrors from (confusing yet true :o)).
Although this does not sort the actual problem of the stale mirrors, it will give people an easy way to monitor their own (local?) mirrors and perhaps even allow people to select a few often-updated near-by mirrors, instead of getting packages from a stale mirror across the ocean.
It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files. If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic.
- Ian
Message: 6 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:46:02 -0400 From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" clydekunkel7734@cox.net Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes To: richard@hughsie.com, Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 45143D7A.8000008@cox.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Richard Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com wrote:
gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
- Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson alexl@redhat.com - 0.8.1-1.fc6
- Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
- Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb sgrubb@redhat.com 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
- Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
Anyone else getting this:
(1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB 00:09 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror. (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB 00:00 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
Known issue? Thanks.
Richard.
Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
# rpm -Uvh http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/... http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...
then, yum update.
WFM.
-- Regards,
Old Fart (my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)
Message: 7 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:09 -0500 From: Chris Adams cmadams@hiwaay.net Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com, fedora-test-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 20060922195309.GD657887@hiwaay.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7734@cox.net said:
Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
# rpm -Uvh http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/... http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...
It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those two files), and I still get the same error. -- Chris Adams cmadams@hiwaay.net Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Message: 8 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:54:42 -0400 From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" clydekunkel7734@cox.net Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes To: Chris Adams cmadams@hiwaay.net, Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com, fedora-test-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 45144D92.8020903@cox.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7734@cox.net said:
Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
# rpm -Uvh http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/... http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...
It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those two files), and I still get the same error.
Same here...so,
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
is not the mirror master?
-- Regards,
Old Fart (my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)
Message: 9 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:09:07 -0600 From: Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com Subject: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: ef1jdp$fqd$1@sea.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Just trying to build paraview against libOSMesa.so now that it's made its return and am getting the following link errors:
/usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to `security_get_boolean_active' /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to `security_get_boolean_pending'
This is against today's rawhide (mesa-libOSMesa-devel-6.5.1-3.fc6). Need to explicitly link against -lselinux these days? Should libOSMesa be linked against libselinux?
/usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so.6.5.1: libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002aaaaaf53000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002aaaab1d6000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaab3f0000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)
-- Orion Poplawski System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
Message: 10 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:18:14 +0200 From: Thomas M Steenholdt tmus@tmus.dk Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: ef1jum$hn7$1@sea.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Ian Burrell wrote:
It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files. If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic.
This does not provide the mirroring trace (which I think would be very nice), it also says nothing about whether or not the rest of the files have been mirrored or only the repomd.xml file.
/Thomas
Message: 11 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:37:39 -0500 From: Mike Chambers mike@miketc.com Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Cc: fedora-test-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 1158961059.2552.1.camel@scrappy.miketc.com Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 07:39 -0400, buildsys@redhat.com wrote:
Updated Packages:
evolution-data-server-1.8.0-9.fc6
- Thu Sep 21 2006 Matthew Barnes mbarnes@redhat.com - 1.8.0-9.fc6
- Revise patch for RH bug #198935 (fix a crash reported in bug #207446).
Evo-2.8.0-6 wasn't included in today's build? Guess tomorrow's or on a people.redhat.com site until then?
-- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY
"Sex is like air, it's not important unless your not getting any!"
Message: 12 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:53:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Bojan Smojver bojan@rexursive.com Subject: Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: loom.20060922T234458-491@post.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Naoki <naoki <at> valuecommerce.com> writes:
Ahh, indeed the RH repo is fine :
# rpm -Uvh
Actually, it still isn't. You can force all kinds of things by using RPM directly. Yum, however, will check packages checksum against what it has in its primary.xml.gz file. For example, here are 3 packages from i386 repository:
1a9e25cd7c81e1ce10e2b73dc47a35eed166a698 gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm 2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761 hal-0.5.7.1-3.fc6.i386.rpm a7b7fd448a2960c355c039297b070fece73f7521 hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm
However, primary.xml.gz has:
<name>gsf-sharp</name> <arch>i386</arch>
<version epoch="0" ver="0.8.1" rel="1.fc6"/> <checksum type="sha" pkgid="YES">ffadfbeab23ac7ef2d252ae68930ca4283435129</checksum>
<name>hal</name> <arch>i386</arch>
<version epoch="0" ver="0.5.7.1" rel="3.fc6"/> <checksum type="sha" pkgid="YES">2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761</checksum>
<name>hsqldb</name> <arch>i386</arch>
<version epoch="1" ver="1.8.0.4" rel="3jpp.2"/> <checksum type="sha" pkgid="YES">e1131397f0919ff1d04c16b5fcb7be6b82891748</checksum> -------------------------------------
Two of those three don't match the checksum and yum won't update them. Here are the errors:
(5/38): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3j 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB 00:10 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror. (16/38): gsf-sharp-0.8.1- 100% |=========================| 42 kB 00:00 http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum Trying other mirror.
-- Bojan
Message: 13 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:10:35 -0700 From: Peter Gordon peter@thecodergeek.com Subject: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 4514B3BB.8070801@thecodergeek.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello, all.
I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a few SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else that is malfunctioning.
I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up.
Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks.
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060922/2c709...
Message: 14 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:40:47 +0200 From: Mark Rosenstand mark@borkware.net Subject: Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 1158990047.833.50.camel@mjollnir.borkware.net Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 21:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
Hello, all.
I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a few SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else that is malfunctioning.
I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up.
Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks.
I don't think you need to disable it in the server - just either disable the compositor in metacity, or in the case of compiz, don't launch it.
Message: 15 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:18:27 +0300 From: Gilboa Davara gilboad@gmail.com Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 1158999507.19122.29.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dax Kelson (dax@gurulabs.com) said:
SysVinit-2.86-12
- Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com - 2.86-12
- set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung services (#184340)
I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting this wrong.
You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can screwup and stop the boot.
I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt rc.sysinit.
Bill
I second Dax's comment. Can you make it configurable?
Gilboa
Message: 16 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:25 -0500 From: Matt Domsch Matt_Domsch@dell.com Subject: Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 20060923034225.A30049@humbolt.us.dell.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Fri Sep 22 22:20:06 CDT 2006
Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot starting with FC6test2. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more information, including the list of packages removed from the default build chroot.
Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6 starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html
Total packages: 1156 Number failed to build: 46 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 25 Leaving: 21 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 21
alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6 am-utils-6.1.5-4 compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-61 compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4 control-center-2.16.0-5.fc6 file-roller-2.16.0-2.fc6 gdb-6.5-8.fc6 gnome-media-2.16.1-2.fc6 grub-0.97-12 gthumb-2.7.8-3.fc6 jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1 jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1 kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6 memtest86+-1.65-4.1 nautilus-2.16.0-4.fc6 rhythmbox-0.9.5-4.fc6 syslinux-3.11-4 totem-2.16.1-1.fc6 valgrind-3.2.0-5 xen-3.0.2-36 yelp-2.16.0-3.fc6
With bugs filed: 0
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
-- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
Message: 17 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:34 -0500 From: Matt Domsch Matt_Domsch@dell.com Subject: Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 20060923034234.A30067@humbolt.us.dell.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Fri Sep 22 22:22:23 CDT 2006
Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot starting with FC6test2. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more information, including the list of packages removed from the default build chroot.
Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6 starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html
Total packages: 1157 Number failed to build: 15 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 10 Leaving: 5 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 5
beagle-0.2.10-2.fc6 jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1 jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1 kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6 xorg-x11-drv-via-0.2.1-5
With bugs filed: 0
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
-- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
End of fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
Bob wrote:
Please unsubscribe me... I forgot my password and can't do it myself...
Thanks.
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list even offers a password reminder