Boost 1.60?

[Tom Hughes]

Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?

I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 
1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?

Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom(a)compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/

[Peter Robinson]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes <tom(a)compton.nu&gt; wrote:
>  Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
>
>  I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2
>  this morning in the main f24 tag? 
There's been no request on the rel-eng ticket to tag it all back in so
I suspect some one made a mistake.

[Jan Kurik]

There is an approved Change for F24 to upgrade boost:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160
Perhaps someone started to work on it.

Regards,
Jan

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes <tom(a)compton.nu&gt;
> wrote:
> > Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
> >
> > I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2
> > this morning in the main f24 tag?
>
>  There's been no request on the rel-eng ticket to tag it all back in so
>  I suspect some one made a mistake.
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail] 


-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic

[Neal Becker]

Jan Kurik wrote:

>  There is an approved Change for F24 to upgrade boost:
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160
>  Perhaps someone started to work on it.
>  
>  Regards,
>  Jan
>  
>  On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com&gt;
>  wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes <tom(a)compton.nu&gt; wrote:
> >> Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
> >>
> >> I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
> >> 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
> >
> > There's been no request on the rel-eng ticket to tag it all back in so
> > I suspect some one made a mistake.
> > --
> > devel mailing list
> > devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>  
>   
I'm concerned about this issue:
 
//permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.c++/16601>

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 14/01/16 12:40 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
>
> I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 
> 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
>
> Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei. 
Argh! Sorry, I started the rebuilds in the side tag but didn't use
--target for the 1.60.0-2 build. I'll get it re-tagged.

Sorry about that!

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 14/01/16 13:23 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 14/01/16 12:40 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
> >
> >I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 
> >1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
> >
> >Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei.
>
> Argh! Sorry, I started the rebuilds in the side tag but didn't use
> --target for the 1.60.0-2 build. I'll get it re-tagged.
>
> Sorry about that! 
koji gave me a "TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable" exception but
the build seems to have bee re-tagged as f24-boost now.

Did any other builds get done against the new boost, that should also
be re-tagged?

[Tom Hughes]

On 14/01/16 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>  On 14/01/16 13:23 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 14/01/16 12:40 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >> Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
> >>
> >> I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
> >> 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
> >>
> >> Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei.
> >
> > Argh! Sorry, I started the rebuilds in the side tag but didn't use
> > --target for the 1.60.0-2 build. I'll get it re-tagged.
> >
> > Sorry about that!
>
>  koji gave me a "TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable" exception but
>  the build seems to have bee re-tagged as f24-boost now. 
Welcome to the BZ#1186994 club, you're just in time for it's first 
anniversary celebration. I'm sure a fix will be along any year now.

>  Did any other builds get done against the new boost, that should
> also
>  be re-tagged? 
I didn't do any, but I don't know about anybody else.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom(a)compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 14/01/16 12:40 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
>
> I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 
> 1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag? 
Boost 1.60 really has landed in rawhide now (a few days ago actually,
sorry for not announcing it sooner).

There are a few packages that failed to rebuild with the new Boost, as
usual with a new Boost release.

I'll be going through them slowly and filing bugs but if you maintain
a package showing broken deps in the daily rawhide report and you have
time please try a scratch build and see if you can resolve the build
failures.

I am available to help if it looks like a GCC, C++11 or Boost-related
issue.