Stephen opened this FPC ticket:
https://pagure.io/packaging-
committee/issue/777
So, I'm stepping back from writing the draft... think it would just slow
down the process, since you folks
are more clear on what you're wanting - and I'm fine with what both Stephen
and Jason wrote previously.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox(a)bzb.us> wrote:
FESCo has decided to review this topic at their next meeting. I will
hold
off submitting
another draft pending the results of that discussion.
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1918
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox(a)bzb.us> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> >>>>> "GBC" == Gerald B Cox <gbcox(a)bzb.us>
writes:
>>
>> To me this doesn't make much sense in the context in which you have put
>> it. The existing hardware activation section is just this paragraph:
>> ...
>> I don't disagree with the idea behind what you're proposing, but the
>> hardware activation section is quite the wrong place to put it.
>>
>> It seems to me that a far more appropriate place would be in the
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices document
>>
> ...
>
> Completely agree. I'll make the changes and repost another draft via
> email.
>
> Thanks for you help Jason!
>
>