11:19 a.m.
Hi All,
I really like being able to use COPR to build rpms, what a great tool. Be
nice to have a one stop shop under one roof for all the supported arches.
Given that 'armhfp' is now a primary arch are there any plans in the works
to offer 'armhfp' chroots in COPR?
Thanks in advance,
JerryV
1:26 p.m.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 11:19:00 -0600 (CST)
Jerry Vonau <me(a)jvonau.ca> wrote:
Hi All,
I really like being able to use COPR to build rpms, what a great
tool. Be nice to have a one stop shop under one roof for all the
supported arches. Given that 'armhfp' is now a primary arch are there
any plans in the works to offer 'armhfp' chroots in COPR?
There are plans, it's just not been implemented yet. ;)
We have some hardware in place, we just need to it integrated with
copr. Hopefully before too long.
kevin
2:49 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 11:19:00 -0600 (CST)
Jerry Vonau <me(a)jvonau.ca> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I really like being able to use COPR to build rpms, what a great
> tool. Be nice to have a one stop shop under one roof for all the
> supported arches. Given that 'armhfp' is now a primary arch are there
> any plans in the works to offer 'armhfp' chroots in COPR?
There are plans, it's just not been implemented yet. ;)
We have some hardware in place, we just need to it integrated with
copr. Hopefully before too long.
kevin
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Why don't we do emulated builds (like how OBS does it for ARM)?
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
3:39 p.m.
On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa" <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 11:19:00 -0600 (CST)
> Jerry Vonau <me(a)jvonau.ca> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I really like being able to use COPR to build rpms, what a great
> > tool. Be nice to have a one stop shop under one roof for all the
> > supported arches. Given that 'armhfp' is now a primary arch are there
> > any plans in the works to offer 'armhfp' chroots in COPR?
>
> There are plans, it's just not been implemented yet. ;)
>
> We have some hardware in place, we just need to it integrated with
> copr. Hopefully before too long.
>
> kevin
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Why don't we do emulated builds (like how OBS does it for ARM)?
The attempts at emulated builds have usually been slower than the hardware
builds
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
6:51 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa" <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why don't we do emulated builds (like how OBS does it for ARM)?
>
>
The attempts at emulated builds have usually been slower than the hardware
builds
Are they unusable? I find it hard to believe that emulated builds are
that horrible for building in when we don't have much hardware for ARM
builds...
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
7:36 p.m.
On 7 November 2015 at 17:51, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
<smooge(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa" <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why don't we do emulated builds (like how OBS does it for ARM)?
> >
> >
>
> The attempts at emulated builds have usually been slower than the hardware
> builds
Are they unusable? I find it hard to believe that emulated builds are that
horrible for building in when we don't have much hardware for ARM builds...
If we are talking about cross-compiling emultation builds (some people
use that term so I need to make sure I am clear) then I think we
haven't looked into it because we don't do cross-compiles in the main
build system. If we are talking about using qemu to emulate arm, the
problem is that the speed was so slow that it was interfering with
builds thinking they were broken (timed out) when they were just
really slow. However that was a long time ago (2 years?) so it may
have improved.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
2:22 p.m.
>> On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa"
<ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Why don't we do emulated builds (like how OBS does it for ARM)?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> The attempts at emulated builds have usually been slower than the hardware
>> builds
>
> Are they unusable? I find it hard to believe that emulated builds are that
> horrible for building in when we don't have much hardware for ARM builds...
>
>
If we are talking about cross-compiling emultation builds (some people
use that term so I need to make sure I am clear) then I think we
haven't looked into it because we don't do cross-compiles in the main
build system. If we are talking about using qemu to emulate arm, the
problem is that the speed was so slow that it was interfering with
builds thinking they were broken (timed out) when they were just
really slow. However that was a long time ago (2 years?) so it may
have improved.
There's a bunch of issues with cross compiling a lot of things,
partially around a bunch of the things that run around the actual
composing. The way OBS does that is by running those bits in a qemu
emulated. It's quite messy and it would need a bunch of development.
We're much closer to getting ARMv7 on aarch64 VMs running and that
would be more suitable for all involved.
Peter
7:31 a.m.
On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 18:36 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 November 2015 at 17:51, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <
> smooge(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa" <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Why don't we do emulated builds (like how OBS does it for ARM)?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The attempts at emulated builds have usually been slower than the
> > hardware
> > builds
>
> Are they unusable? I find it hard to believe that emulated builds
> are that
> horrible for building in when we don't have much hardware for ARM
> builds...
>
>
If we are talking about cross-compiling emultation builds (some
people
use that term so I need to make sure I am clear) then I think we
haven't looked into it because we don't do cross-compiles in the main
build system. If we are talking about using qemu to emulate arm, the
problem is that the speed was so slow that it was interfering with
builds thinking they were broken (timed out) when they were just
really slow. However that was a long time ago (2 years?) so it may
have improved.
The Mer project OBS[0] uses qemu ARM emulation and the speed seems
to
be fine. Also I think the production builds for Sailfish OS are done
the same way.
[0] https://build.merproject.org/
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
3101
days inactive
3103
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Jerry Vonau -
Kevin Fenzi -
Martin Kolman -
Neal Gompa -
Peter Robinson -
Stephen John Smoogen