[RFC] mesa 10.0 stack in F20

[Igor Gnatenko]

Hey, folks!

Actually 9.2.3 doesn't built on armv7 (FDO #71573) and I think more
better for new release to get updated mesa stack. Probably mesa 9.2.4
will also has this bug.

What do you say about this idea?

-- 
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
Linux 3.11.7-300.fc20.x86_64

[Fabian Deutsch]

Hey Igor.

Am Donnerstag, den 14.11.2013, 11:45 +0400 schrieb Igor Gnatenko:
>  Actually 9.2.3 doesn't built on armv7 (FDO #71573) and I think
> more
>  better for new release to get updated mesa stack. Probably mesa 9.2.4
>  will also has this bug.
>  
>  What do you say about this idea? 
+1 on preparing for mesa 10.0. With my OpenCL hat on I can tel that we
probably need to add some subpackages (gbm for gallium and opencl), so
doing and testing this might be good.
OTOH I don't know if there are major drawbacks we have from migrating to
10, or if features were dropped which we rely on.

As a note: A couple of days back I tried to do a build based on a git
snapshot on x86_64, there were some llvm path related problems wich
stopped me from further trying.

- fabian

[Bill Nottingham]

Igor Gnatenko (i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com) said: 
>  Hey, folks!
>  
>  Actually 9.2.3 doesn't built on armv7 (FDO #71573) and I think more
>  better for new release to get updated mesa stack. Probably mesa 9.2.4
>  will also has this bug.
>  
>  What do you say about this idea? 
It's post-beta, post-GFX-test-week. While I'd defer to the driver team, I'm
not sure that a mesa rebase at this point in the schedule makes sense.

Bill