libdrm vs mesa updates - update group for bodhi?

[David Airlie]

So I say libdrm was going to be karma'ed into updates, and
I thought I'd disabled that but it all got confused a few days ago.

So I thought well I better push all the packages that depends on it
into updates as well, and they'll all end up in one signing pass
and everyone will be happy.

Now somehow mesa is in updates without libdrm/xorg-x11-drv-ati/plymouth
updates that should have gone with it.

Do we have any way to do some sort of grouping in bodhi so as to
avoid this happening.

Dave.

[Mathieu Bridon]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 05:03, Dave Airlie  wrote:
> So I say libdrm was going to be karma'ed into updates, and
> I thought I'd disabled that but it all got confused a few days ago.

There was a bug with auto-karma that got enabled no matter what each
time you created / edited an update (see bug #353 in the Bodhi trac).

I fixed it some time ago, it's in Git, but I don't know if it's been
pushed to production yet.
> So I thought well I better push all the packages that depends on it
> into updates as well, and they'll all end up in one signing pass
> and everyone will be happy.
>
> Now somehow mesa is in updates without libdrm/xorg-x11-drv-ati/plymouth
> updates that should have gone with it.
>
> Do we have any way to do some sort of grouping in bodhi so as to
> avoid this happening.

You can simply put several packages in the same update.

However, once the updates were created, I don't think there is any way
to group them (at least I didn't see that in the code yet :). In case
it's not, it would probably be a nice feature for the upcoming Bodhi
2.0 rewrital.

----------
Mathieu Bridon