5:39 a.m.
I'm trying to build the owncloud 9.1.1 update but in rawhide mock is
failing with:
Error: nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) needed by
samba-client-libs-2:4.5.1-1.fc26.x86_64
Was there a SO bump that missed a rebuild?
5:47 a.m.
2016-12-06 12:39 GMT+01:00 James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com>:
I'm trying to build the owncloud 9.1.1 update but in rawhide mock
is
failing with:
Error: nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) needed by
samba-client-libs-2:4.5.1-1.fc26.x86_64
Was there a SO bump that missed a rebuild?
It's not a SONAME bump, but the new update doesn't have version ed
symbol anymore.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400738
If any provenpackager can rebuild theses dependencies ?
openchange
samba
sssd
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
5:50 a.m.
On 6 December 2016 at 11:47, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2016-12-06 12:39 GMT+01:00 James Hogarth
<james.hogarth(a)gmail.com>:
> I'm trying to build the owncloud 9.1.1 update but in rawhide mock is
> failing with:
>
> Error: nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) needed by
> samba-client-libs-2:4.5.1-1.fc26.x86_64
>
> Was there a SO bump that missed a rebuild?
It's not a SONAME bump, but the new update doesn't have version ed
symbol anymore.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400738
If any provenpackager can rebuild theses dependencies ?
openchange
samba
sssd
Thanks for the link i'm giving a quick set of scratch builds a test
now to see if they build cleanly on rebuild or if there is work to do
5:57 a.m.
On 6 December 2016 at 11:50, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 December 2016 at 11:47, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-12-06 12:39 GMT+01:00 James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com>:
>> I'm trying to build the owncloud 9.1.1 update but in rawhide mock is
>> failing with:
>>
>> Error: nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) needed by
>> samba-client-libs-2:4.5.1-1.fc26.x86_64
>>
>> Was there a SO bump that missed a rebuild?
>
> It's not a SONAME bump, but the new update doesn't have version ed
> symbol anymore.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400738
>
> If any provenpackager can rebuild theses dependencies ?
> openchange
> samba
> sssd
>
Thanks for the link i'm giving a quick set of scratch builds a test
now to see if they build cleanly on rebuild or if there is work to do
And it's not a simple rebuild it appears:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16771056
6:03 a.m.
On 6 December 2016 at 11:57, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 December 2016 at 11:50, James Hogarth
<james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 December 2016 at 11:47, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2016-12-06 12:39 GMT+01:00 James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com>:
>>> I'm trying to build the owncloud 9.1.1 update but in rawhide mock is
>>> failing with:
>>>
>>> Error: nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) needed by
>>> samba-client-libs-2:4.5.1-1.fc26.x86_64
>>>
>>> Was there a SO bump that missed a rebuild?
>>
>> It's not a SONAME bump, but the new update doesn't have version ed
>> symbol anymore.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400738
>>
>> If any provenpackager can rebuild theses dependencies ?
>> openchange
>> samba
>> sssd
>>
>
> Thanks for the link i'm giving a quick set of scratch builds a test
> now to see if they build cleanly on rebuild or if there is work to do
And it's not a simple rebuild it appears:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16771056
I've opened a bug to track the rebuild and whatever is causing the
FTBFS in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401916
2:22 a.m.
On ti, 06 joulu 2016, James Hogarth wrote:
On 6 December 2016 at 11:57, James Hogarth
<james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 December 2016 at 11:50, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6 December 2016 at 11:47, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2016-12-06 12:39 GMT+01:00 James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com>:
>>>> I'm trying to build the owncloud 9.1.1 update but in rawhide mock is
>>>> failing with:
>>>>
>>>> Error: nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) needed by
>>>> samba-client-libs-2:4.5.1-1.fc26.x86_64
>>>>
>>>> Was there a SO bump that missed a rebuild?
>>>
>>> It's not a SONAME bump, but the new update doesn't have version ed
>>> symbol anymore.
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400738
>>>
>>> If any provenpackager can rebuild theses dependencies ?
>>> openchange
>>> samba
>>> sssd
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the link i'm giving a quick set of scratch builds a test
>> now to see if they build cleanly on rebuild or if there is work to do
>
> And it's not a simple rebuild it appears:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16771056
I've opened a bug to track the rebuild and whatever is causing the
FTBFS in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401916
The problem is in the new CFLAGS
enforced by rpm. They make Samba (and
libraries) configuration script to fail to recognize versioning and
build without it.
There are some patches upstream trying to deal with the issue, not
merged yet.
A mere rebuild will not help, sorry.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
2719
days inactive
2720
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexander Bokovoy -
James Hogarth -
Nicolas Chauvet