unfiled merge reviews

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

Hi,

I am wondering what to do about former Core packages without merge reviews.

I am aware of a number of i18n (input method) related packages without 
merge reviews (anthy, libchewing, m17n-db, and m17n-lib).  There are 
surely more in the distro.  Should merge review bugs be opened for them?

One reason for asking is that I would like to build the above packages 
for EPEL EL-4 and presumably the package need to be reviewed for that?

Jens

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:30:52 +1000
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi,
>  
>  I am wondering what to do about former Core packages without merge
>  reviews.
>  
>  I am aware of a number of i18n (input method) related packages
>  without merge reviews (anthy, libchewing, m17n-db, and m17n-lib).
>  There are surely more in the distro.  Should merge review bugs be
>  opened for them?
>  
>  One reason for asking is that I would like to build the above
>  packages for EPEL EL-4 and presumably the package need to be reviewed
>  for that?
>  
>  Jens
>   
Are they just missing merge reviews?  Did they have reviews to get into
Core the first time?  A merge review is only necessary if there wasn't
a review to get it into core the first time (I thought...)

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

Jens Petersen さんは書きました:
>  I am aware of a number of i18n (input method) related packages
> without 
>  merge reviews (anthy, libchewing, m17n-db, and m17n-lib).  There are 
>  surely more in the distro.  Should merge review bugs be opened for them? 
(Some old reviews exist for m17n-db (#169919), m17n-lib (#169922), and 
libchewing (#166472), but this is also true of scim-m17n and 
scim-chewing though they have new merge reviews too.)

Jens

[Christian Iseli]

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:47:47 +1000, Jens Petersen wrote:
>  (Some old reviews exist for m17n-db (#169919), m17n-lib (#169922),
> and 
>  libchewing (#166472), but this is also true of scim-m17n and 
>  scim-chewing though they have new merge reviews too.) 
If they had a review that's fine.  No need for a re-review at this
point.

					C