Hi all,
I'm orphaning the following packages:
* json-glib - required for: * clutter * cheese * couchdb-glib * gnome-games * libepc - required for: * glom * totem-publish * libjingle- required for: * Chromium (?) * libsexy - required for: * xchat * xchat-gnome * gmpc * gwaei * perl-Gtk2-Sexy * loudmouth - required for: * amarok * freetalk * irssi-xmpp * libabiword * mcabber * meld * tagtool * xchat-gnome
Thanks, /B
Il giorno 13/mar/2011, alle ore 16.04, Brian Pepple ha scritto:
* xchat-gnome
I might be interested in adopting this package. I am not really used on how packages adoptions work in Fedora.
I wasnt able to find a nice wiki page for that either, so it would be great if someone could show me the right way for doing this. (i.e a wiki page)
Andrea
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 16:12:41 +0100, Andrea Veri averi@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I might be interested in adopting this package. I am not really used on how packages adoptions work in Fedora.
I wasnt able to find a nice wiki page for that either, so it would be great if someone could show me the right way for doing this. (i.e a wiki page)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#About_Orph...
2011/3/13 Andrea Veri averi@fedoraproject.org:
Il giorno 13/mar/2011, alle ore 16.04, Brian Pepple ha scritto:
* xchat-gnome
I might be interested in adopting this package. I am not really used on how packages adoptions work in Fedora.
I wasnt able to find a nice wiki page for that either, so it would be great if someone could show me the right way for doing this. (i.e a wiki page)
Andrea
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Andrea,
AFAIK, this page is what you are looking for: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_O...
HTH
Il giorno 13/mar/2011, alle ore 16.36, Sergio Belkin ha scritto:
Hi Andrea,
AFAIK, this page is what you are looking for: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_O...
You rock, thanks!
Andrea
Andrea Veri (averi@fedoraproject.org) said:
Hi Andrea,
AFAIK, this page is what you are looking for: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_O...
You rock, thanks!
Were you going to take this? I use it enough that I may be able to do a little bit of co-maintenance in terms of shepherding it through the build system, fixing build issues, etc., but I don't know that I have time to diagnose crash reports and do lots of liasing with upstream.
Bill
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple:
* meld * tagtool
I've taken these two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :)
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
* tagtool
Seems to be dead, at least the homepage disappeared.
Well, that actually seems to be right, but maybe could be updated to http://sourceforge.net/projects/tagtool/, though. But even with that, upstream doesn't seem to be that active at present, unfortunately. :(
Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so, is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of view?
Regards, Dominic
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:15 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so, is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of view?
Nope. None that I can see. It really is an amazing tool and should be available in the repos until something better comes up as a replacement IMO.
Regards, Ankur
Am Montag, den 14.03.2011, 01:10 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:15 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so, is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of view?
Nope. None that I can see. It really is an amazing tool and should be available in the repos until something better comes up as a replacement IMO.
easytag?
Regards, Christoph
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 23:13 +0100 schrieb Matej Cepl:
Dne 13.3.2011 20:39, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
easytag?
Unfortunately, it is not a separate package.
$ rpm -qi easytag Name : easytag Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.1.6 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 5.fc14 Build Date: Fr 20 Aug 2010 16:32:22 CEST Install Date: Fr 26 Nov 2010 00:43:29 CET Build Host: x86-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org Group : Applications/Multimedia Source RPM: easytag-2.1.6-5.fc14.src.rpm Size : 2841577 License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Signature : RSA/SHA256, Fr 20 Aug 2010 19:32:49 CEST, Key ID 421caddb97a1071f Packager : Fedora Project URL : http://easytag.sourceforge.net/ Summary : Tag editor for mp3, ogg, flac and other music files Description : EasyTAG is a utility for viewing, editing and writing the tags of MP3, MP2, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, MusePack and Monkey's Audio files.
Regards, Christoph
Matej Cepl mcepl@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 14.3.2011 00:31, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
$ rpm -qi easytag
Sorry, I have confused it with ExFalso which is IMHO the best tag manager, except it is bound to quodlibet.
I've got a bug filed[1] for that.
--Ben
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:24 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 14.3.2011 00:31, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
$ rpm -qi easytag
Sorry, I have confused it with ExFalso which is IMHO the best tag manager, except it is bound to quodlibet.
I'm an easytag fan along with Christoph. It has a somewhat 'quirky' interface, but once you figure it out it's extremely efficient.
On 03/13/2011 09:39 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.03.2011, 01:10 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:15 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so, is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of view?
Nope. None that I can see. It really is an amazing tool and should be available in the repos until something better comes up as a replacement IMO.
easytag?
If the dependencies are not an issue, check out kid3 (KDE deps) or kid3-qt (Qt deps).
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so, is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of view?
It will probably take a bit of work to remove the gtk2 depreciated cruft to get it working again with F15.
Later, /B -- Brian Pepple bpepple@fedoraproject.org
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 23:31 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 16:41 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple:
* meld * tagtool
I've taken these two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :)
Hey!
I'd like to help co-maintain tagtool. I use it regularly :)
Should I apply?
Yeah, just request the Co-Maintainership in pkgdb, I'll approve the requests then. :)
Regards, Dominic
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 11:04 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
I'm orphaning the following packages:
* json-glib
I'm not sure if this would be better maintained alongside glib, but I use this library and would happily [co]maintain it.
Thanks
Alex.
-- This message was scanned by Better Hosted and is believed to be clean. http://www.betterhosted.com