Hi Marcela,
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Modified Files: libid3tag.spec Log Message:
- Mon Oct 12 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com - 0.15.1b-10
- rebuilt of package with correct licence
[...]
-License: GPLv2+ +License: GPLv2 or GPL+ or MIT
I could easily be missing the obvious, but why is this change needed? All of the *.c source files have:
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version.
The COPYRIGHT file included in the tarball states GPLv2+ as well.
So where does GPL+ come from? And what code is MIT?
On 10/12/2009 03:39 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Hi Marcela,
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Modified Files: libid3tag.spec Log Message:
- Mon Oct 12 2009 Marcela Mašláňovámmaslano@redhat.com - 0.15.1b-10
- rebuilt of package with correct licence
[...]
-License: GPLv2+ +License: GPLv2 or GPL+ or MIT
I could easily be missing the obvious, but why is this change needed? All of the *.c source files have:
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
- the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
- (at your option) any later version.
The COPYRIGHT file included in the tarball states GPLv2+ as well.
So where does GPL+ come from? And what code is MIT?
I'm really sorry. I went through reviews of many packages with script, which has many false positives. Your package was perfectly okay as it was before.
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I'm really sorry. I went through reviews of many packages with script, which has many false positives. Your package was perfectly okay as it was before.
:) No worries, I'm glad I asked. Will you handle reverting this change or shall I? It wasn't ever built, just committed and tagged, correct?
On 10/13/2009 03:29 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I'm really sorry. I went through reviews of many packages with script, which has many false positives. Your package was perfectly okay as it was before.
:) No worries, I'm glad I asked. Will you handle reverting this change or shall I? It wasn't ever built, just committed and tagged, correct?
I checked koji builds and it wasn't build. I revert it in cvs. Sorry again.