Re: Fedora and cvs 1.12.x?

[Jeroen Janssen]

Hello,

(I'm hoping this is the correct mailinglist, if not then please let me
know where to send this to)

I was wondering if/when Fedora is going to ship CVS 1.12.x (the
current is 1.11-22 in Fedora Core 6).

I am really interested in using the new http proxy functionality in
cvs 1.12.7 since it is the only way I am able to use cvs with the
proxy server at work.

Note for comparison that CVS 1.12.9 is present in the SuSe Linux 9.2
(build on Thu 07 Apr 2005 06:05:46 PM CEST).

Best regards,

Jeroen Janssen

Fedora and cvs 1.12.x?

[Leo]

On Mon, 20/11/06, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (I'm hoping this is the correct mailinglist, if not then please let me
> know where to send this to)
>
> I was wondering if/when Fedora is going to ship CVS 1.12.x (the
> current is 1.11-22 in Fedora Core 6).
>
> I am really interested in using the new http proxy functionality in
> cvs 1.12.7 since it is the only way I am able to use cvs with the
> proxy server at work.
>
> Note for comparison that CVS 1.12.9 is present in the SuSe Linux 9.2
> (build on Thu 07 Apr 2005 06:05:46 PM CEST).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jeroen Janssen

Didn't realize CVS is this old in Fedora. I'd also like to see an
update. Thanks.

Fedora and cvs 1.12.x?

[Gianluca Sforna]

On 11/20/06, Leo  wrote:
> On Mon, 20/11/06, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
> > I was wondering if/when Fedora is going to ship CVS 1.12.x (the
> > current is 1.11-22 in Fedora Core 6).
>
> Didn't realize CVS is this old in Fedora. I'd also like to see an
> update. Thanks.

1.11.22 is the latest release of cvs from their stable branch: being
released in July I can hardly call it "old".
Please note that, despite having an even release number, 1.12.x is a
"feature" branch (and the last release from that branch is from July
as well)

Fedora and cvs 1.12.x?

[Leo]

On Mon, 20/11/06, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> > Didn't realize CVS is this old in Fedora. I'd also like to see an
> > update. Thanks.
>
> 1.11.22 is the latest release of cvs from their stable branch: being
> released in July I can hardly call it "old".
> Please note that, despite having an even release number, 1.12.x is a
> "feature" branch (and the last release from that branch is from July
> as well)

I see. Thanks.