On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +0000, updates@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38 apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update:
bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma: 0) This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38 have a more recent build in koji's f38 tag.
Jaroslav, could you do a build into the f38-build-side-62208 side tag please, ie:
fedpkg build --target=f38-build-side-62208
Alternately, I could drop the graphviz package from this update and then you'll have to do a build afterwards (or the OCaml part will be broken).
Rich.
To reply to this comment, please visit the URL at the bottom of this mail
================================================================================ FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 38 Status: testing Type: unspecified Severity: unspecified Karma: 0 Critpath: True Notes: Rebuild all OCaml packages after the F38 mass rebuild Submitter: rjones Submitted: 2023-01-25 09:41:44.872273 Comments: bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma 0) This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38 have a more recent build in koji's f38 tag. bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:39:35.011437 (karma 0) This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'. bodhi - 2023-01-25 09:41:45.003272 (karma 0) This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:22:18AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +0000, updates@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38 apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update:
bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma: 0) This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38 have a more recent build in koji's f38 tag.
Jaroslav, could you do a build into the f38-build-side-62208 side tag please, ie:
fedpkg build --target=f38-build-side-62208
Alternately, I could drop the graphviz package from this update and then you'll have to do a build afterwards (or the OCaml part will be broken).
Rich.
To reply to this comment, please visit the URL at the bottom of this mail
================================================================================ FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 38 Status: testing Type: unspecified Severity: unspecified Karma: 0 Critpath: True Notes: Rebuild all OCaml packages after the F38 mass rebuild Submitter: rjones Submitted: 2023-01-25 09:41:44.872273 Comments: bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma 0) This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38 have a more recent build in koji's f38 tag. bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:39:35.011437 (karma 0) This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'. bodhi - 2023-01-25 09:41:45.003272 (karma 0) This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981
And I could do with some help here too...
How do you edit the list of builds (to remove a build)? I cannot see any way to do this in the UI.
Alternately, why does an older build block a push to stable? Won't the old build simply be ignored if there's a higher NVR version around?
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2023/01/25 22:12:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:22:18AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +0000, updates@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38 apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update:
bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma: 0) This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38 have a more recent build in koji's f38 tag.
Jaroslav, could you do a build into the f38-build-side-62208 side tag please, ie:
fedpkg build --target=f38-build-side-62208
Alternately, I could drop the graphviz package from this update and then you'll have to do a build afterwards (or the OCaml part will be broken).
Rich.
To reply to this comment, please visit the URL at the bottom of this mail
================================================================================ FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 38 Status: testing Type: unspecified Severity: unspecified Karma: 0 Critpath: True Notes: Rebuild all OCaml packages after the F38 mass rebuild Submitter: rjones Submitted: 2023-01-25 09:41:44.872273 Comments: bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma 0) This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38 have a more recent build in koji's f38 tag. bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:39:35.011437 (karma 0) This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'. bodhi - 2023-01-25 09:41:45.003272 (karma 0) This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981
And I could do with some help here too...
How do you edit the list of builds (to remove a build)? I cannot see any way to do this in the UI.
Alternately, why does an older build block a push to stable? Won't the old build simply be ignored if there's a higher NVR version around?
Rich.
For now I removed graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38 from the above bodhi request, and the rest 183 pkgs now went to f38 buildroot.
Just note: side-tag can be untagged: $ koji untag f38-build-side-62208 graphviz-7.0.6-4.fc38
Then again go to the bodhi request and push "edit", and push "reload" side-tag build, then actually untagged builds are removed from update request.
Regards, Mamoru
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:12:47PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
How do you edit the list of builds (to remove a build)? I cannot see any way to do this in the UI.
Thanks Mamoru Tasaka for editing it.
Rich.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:12:47PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
...snip...
Alternately, why does an older build block a push to stable? Won't the old build simply be ignored if there's a higher NVR version around?
Nope, koji and pungi have no idea about 'older' or 'newer', they only know 'latest tagged package' and 'previously tagged package'.
So, when pungi does a compose it asks koji: "hey, give me the last tagged package for all packages in f38 tag".
So, in this case if we did let this through, the 'older' one would be in the compose.
kevin