Mass rebuilds update

[Dennis Gilmore]

Hi All,

We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the
scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one
was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The
failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4]

Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has us
branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi  on August
the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week from
now.

Many Thanks

Dennis

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
[3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
[4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-failur
es.html
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/Schedule

_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

[Matthew Miller]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the
>  scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one
>  was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The
>  failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] 
How should we read these two lists? Do we need to check both, or does
one supercede the other?

>  Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has us
>  branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi  on August
>  the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week from
>  now. 
Cool!

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Dennis Gilmore]

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 10:50 -0400, Matthew Miller escribió:
>  On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the
>  > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second
>  > one
>  > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The
>  > failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and
>  > here[4]
>  
>  How should we read these two lists? Do we need to check both, or does
>  one supercede the other? 
If your package is a noarch only package, you should read the first
list, if your package is archful you should look for it in the second
list. It is all a tad messy.

Dennis


>  > Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5]
> has
>  > us
>  > branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi  on
>  > August
>  > the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week
>  > from
>  > now.
>  
>  Cool!
>  
>  -- 
>  Matthew Miller
>  <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  Fedora Project Leader
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

[Florian Weimer]

On 08/07/2017 04:35 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the
>  scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one
>  was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The
>  failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] 
Have the builds from the second mass rebuild been tagged into the
rawhide buildroot?  I don't see them there.

Thanks,
Florian

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 08/07/2017 08:14 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>  On 08/07/2017 04:35 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the
> > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one
> > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The
> > failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4]
>  
>  Have the builds from the second mass rebuild been tagged into the
>  rawhide buildroot?  I don't see them there. 
They are slowly being added as they are signed...

look at:

 koji list-tagged f27-pending

and

 koji list-tag-history --tag=f27

kevin

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  Hi All,
>  
>  We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the
>  scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one
>  was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The
>  failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4]
>  
>  Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has us
>  branching next Tuesday, August the 15th and enabling Bodhi  on August
>  the 29th, So expect to see a 27 branched compose in about a week from
>  now.
>  
>  Many Thanks
>  
>  Dennis
>  
>  [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
>  [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
>  [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
>  [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-failur
>  es.html
>  [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/Schedule 
There's a bunch of failures because of texlive:
DEBUG util.py:439:  Error: nothing provides libpoppler.so.67()(64bit) needed by
texlive-xetex-bin-6:svn41091-35.20160520.fc27.1.x86_64.
DEBUG util.py:439:  nothing provides libpoppler.so.67()(64bit) needed by
texlive-pdftex-bin-6:svn40987-35.20160520.fc27.1.x86_64

Would it be possible to somehow grep the build logs for that error and
fire off automatic rebuilds of affected packages? It might trim the
queue of failed builds quite a bit.

Zbyszek

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  [3]
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
>  [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-failur
>  es.html 
Will the up-to-date status be tracked somehow?

Zbyszek

[Dennis Gilmore]

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 16:35 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
escribió:
>  On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.ht
>  > ml
>  > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-fa
>  > ilur
>  > es.html
>  
>  Will the up-to-date status be tracked somehow?
>   
The script that updates them is being run in screen in a while true
loop sleeping for 600 seconds between runs. so yes, they will be
updated.

Dennis

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:46:34AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 16:35 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  escribió:
>  > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.ht
>  > > ml
>  > > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-fa
>  > > ilur
>  > > es.html
>  > 
>  > Will the up-to-date status be tracked somehow?
>  > 
>  The script that updates them is being run in screen in a while true
>  loop sleeping for 600 seconds between runs. so yes, they will be
>  updated. 
Oh, great. I just fixed all my packages, so I'll be happy to see the next
iteration ;)

Zbyszek

[Mat Booth]

On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us&gt; wrote:

>  [3]
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
>  
This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there
were "0 failed builds" :-)

-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora