3:11 p.m.
Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or
bodhi.
Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
---
Package: perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc8
Tag: dist-f8
Status: complete
Built by: corsepiu
ID: 17859
Started: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:03:10 MST
Finished: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:11:31 MST
---Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8
Tag: dist-f8
Status: complete
Built by: corsepiu
ID: 18195
Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST
Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
Ralf
3:18 p.m.
On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's
procedures or
bodhi.
Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
[snip]
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall
FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package
being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
--
Michel
3:25 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:18 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or
> bodhi.
>
> Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
>
[snip]
> perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall
> FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
>
Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package
being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
Was the package ever rebuilt for F7? ISTR that not all of them were.
That makes it possible for a package with a 'fc6' tag to show up in F7.
It looks like 0.63-6 was built and pushed out on FC6 before the updated
version on F7 got pushed into updates/updates-testing.
Jeff
3:28 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:25 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:18 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
> On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> > Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or
> > bodhi.
> >
> > Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
> >
> [snip]
> > perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall
> > FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
> >
> Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package
> being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
Was the package ever rebuilt for F7?
Package: perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate
Status: complete
Built by: corsepiu
ID: 17860
Started: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:04:50 MST
Finished: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:10:14 MST
Ralf
3:29 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 22:28 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:25 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:18 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
> > On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> > > Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures
or
> > > bodhi.
> > >
> > > Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
> > >
> > [snip]
> > > perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall
> > > FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
> > >
> > Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package
> > being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
>
> Was the package ever rebuilt for F7?
Package: perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate
Status: complete
Built by: corsepiu
ID: 17860
Started: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:04:50 MST
Finished: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:10:14 MST
And push request'ed:
corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
================================================================================
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
================================================================================
Release: Fedora 7
Status: pending
Type: bugfix
Submitter: corsepiu
Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
Ralf
3:38 p.m.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
And push request'ed:
corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
================================================================================
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
================================================================================
Release: Fedora 7
Status: pending
Type: bugfix
Submitter: corsepiu
Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
[ Push to Testing | Push to Stable | Delete | Edit ]
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
4:05 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:38 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> And push request'ed:
>
> corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
>
> ================================================================================
> perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
> ================================================================================
> Release: Fedora 7
> Status: pending
> Type: bugfix
> Submitter: corsepiu
> Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
I don't know if I pushed this
package to stable or not, or if I lost in
the bodhi's usability swamp.
But then you also might be able to explain this:
perl-Set-IntSpan
F7-updates > F8 (0:1.12-1.fc7 > 0:1.11-1.fc7)
Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8
Tag: dist-f8
Status: complete
Built by: corsepiu
ID: 18195
Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST
Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
Ralf
--
Don't cage Fedora. Maintainers, just say no to acls.
4:09 p.m.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:05:36 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:38 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200
> Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
>
> > And push request'ed:
> >
> > corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
> >
> >
================================================================================
> > perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
> >
================================================================================
> > Release: Fedora 7
> > Status: pending
> > Type: bugfix
> > Submitter: corsepiu
> > Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
>
>
> You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
I don't know if I pushed this package to stable or not, or if I lost in
the bodhi's usability swamp.
But then you also might be able to explain this:
perl-Set-IntSpan
F7-updates > F8 (0:1.12-1.fc7 > 0:1.11-1.fc7)
Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8
Tag: dist-f8
Status: complete
Built by: corsepiu
ID: 18195
Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST
Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8.
Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
josh
4:44 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:09 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:05:36 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:38 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200
> > Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> >
> > > And push request'ed:
> > >
> > > corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
> > >
> > >
================================================================================
> > > perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7
> > >
================================================================================
> > > Release: Fedora 7
> > > Status: pending
> > > Type: bugfix
> > > Submitter: corsepiu
> > > Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
> >
> >
> > You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
> I don't know if I pushed this package to stable or not, or if I lost in
> the bodhi's usability swamp.
>
>
> But then you also might be able to explain this:
>
> perl-Set-IntSpan
> F7-updates > F8 (0:1.12-1.fc7 > 0:1.11-1.fc7)
>
> Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8
> Tag: dist-f8
> Status: complete
> Built by: corsepiu
> ID: 18195
> Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST
> Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
>
> This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8.
Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
Great, ... :/
in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Ralf
4:52 p.m.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> >
> > This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
>
> rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8.
> Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
Great, ... :/
in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
josh
5:05 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
> >
> > rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8.
> > Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
>
> Great, ... :/
>
> in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
C'mon, what you
say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody
else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from
submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's
broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final
phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your
procedures.
Ralf
--
Don't cage Fedora. Maintainers, just say no to acls.
5:14 p.m.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:05:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200
> Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
> > >
> > > rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8.
> > > Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
> >
> > Great, ... :/
> >
> > in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
>
> Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
C'mon, what you say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody
else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from
submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's
broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final
phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your
procedures.
Ralf,
http://katzj.livejournal.com/405215.html
;)
5:20 p.m.
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 00:14 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:05:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200
> > Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
> > > >
> > > > rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8.
> > > > Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
> > >
> > > Great, ... :/
> > >
> > > in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
> >
> > Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
> C'mon, what you say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
>
> Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody
> else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from
> submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
>
> So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's
> broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final
> phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your
> procedures.
Ralf,
http://katzj.livejournal.com/405215.html
Well, at least a glimpse of insight ...
... leaves the immaturity of the infrastructure which pees at volunteers
by sending unjustified complaints, if you want to have it "bluntly".
Ralf
8:38 a.m.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
C'mon, what you say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody
else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from
submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's
broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final
phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your
procedures.
If we're talking about freeze, we're talking about rawhide, and if we're
talking about rawhide, we're NOT talking about bodhi. At all. Bodhi
isn't involved in rawhide, so you can stop beating that old drum. Bodhi
didn't eat the curtains, and its kitten consumption is pretty minimal for
a Fedora product.
Jima
9:08 a.m.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 08:38 -0500, Jima wrote:
> At all. Bodhi
> isn't involved in rawhide, so you can stop beating that old drum.
Try "new packages" in bodhi and you will find fc8 packages.
I'm aware of this; IIRC it's due to the way that bodhi looks up packages
against koji. Alas, do you see "Rawhide" or "Fedora 8" anywhere in
the
"Release" drop-down on the "New update" page? I don't. Mainly
because
rawhide updates don't go through bodhi; they get pushed directly.
Jima
6128
days inactive
6129
days old
15 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Jeffrey Ollie -
Jesse Keating -
Jima -
Josh Boyer -
Michael Schwendt -
Michel Salim -
Ralf Corsepius