11:01 p.m.
Greetings.
Just FYI, we are now pushing updates using a Fedora 24 instance.
Because this instance has an rpm that understands weak deps, they are
now in the repodata.
Everything seems to be working, but keep an eye out for any odd
behavior and let us know if you see something.
kevin
1:59 p.m.
I think it is still broken somewhere. I uninstalled fedora-easy-karma, which makes use of
weak deps, and tried to reinstall it. I'm not seeing any suggested/weak deps.
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120
2:25 p.m.
On Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:59:51 -0000
"Christian Stadelmann" <genodeftest(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I think it is still broken somewhere. I uninstalled
fedora-easy-karma, which makes use of weak deps, and tried to
reinstall it. I'm not seeing any suggested/weak deps.
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120
Ah, there may be caching involved.
I'll remove bodhi's repocache for tomorrow's updates push and it should
regen those weak deps for old existing packages in repo.
kevin
7:26 a.m.
Still not working.
The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML
tags is the 2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
file, but it just has those tags for 6 packages.
¹ /var/cache/dnf/updates-testing-648243a4cddd356c
8:06 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Christian Stadelmann
<genodeftest(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Still not working.
The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML
tags is the 2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
file, but it just has those tags for 6 packages.
I don't know why recommends tag for fedora-easy-karma is not appearing
in metadata but I can see recommends tag in the same metadata file for
the recently built packages like openqa. I think fedora-easy-karma
should be the only oldest built package in the f24 updates-testing
repository.
8:51 a.m.
So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go into repo metadata?
This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi and probably should go into a
separate post here and on devel-announce too.
9:12 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Christian Stadelmann
<genodeftest(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go
into repo metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi and
probably should go into a separate post here and on devel-announce too.
I only provided my observation, I don't have access to bodhi server to
look whats happening there exactly. Wait for Kevin's reply on this
issue.
10:08 a.m.
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:26:36 -0000
"Christian Stadelmann" <genodeftest(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Still not working.
The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing
"recommends" XML tags is the
2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
file, but it just has those tags for 6 packages.
¹ /var/cache/dnf/updates-testing-648243a4cddd356c
Right. It's not working because there were no updates pushes yesterday.
We ran into an issue with the f24-updates-testing push and rpm-ostree.
The person on push duty spent all day working with ostree folks on a
solution.
Hopefully we will work around that and/or get the other pushes going
today.
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 13:51:20 -0000
"Christian Stadelmann" <genodeftest(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies
go
into repo metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by
Kevin Fenzi and probably should go into a separate post here and on
devel-announce too.
No. This doesn't need any packages rebuilt.
bodhi keeps a cache of repodata, when new updates are added it uses
this to allow createrepo to make the repodata faster. Basically it says
"Hey, I have all the repodata for the existing updates, you only need
to add these new ones". But we need it to regenerate that old repodata,
because it was generated with rhel7 rpm and has no weak deps in it.
This consists of us removing that repocache directory and doing a push
so bodhi tells createrepo "please generate all the repodata for all the
packages in this repo".
There's nothing maintainers need to do here except wait for the next
updates pushes to finish and sync out.
Does that make sense?
kevin
2:25 p.m.
ok. With excellent help from walters we got the atomic updates composes
working again and everything has now pushed out. (Although
fedora-24-updates-testing just pushed out so it will take it a few to
mirror).
So, all the updates/updates-testing repos should now have weak deps.
Can folks retest and let me know if there's still any issues?
Thanks,
kevin
4:54 p.m.
Still broken.
Steps to reproduce:
0. have updates-testing enabled
1. do not have python2-dnf installed
2. try to install fedora-easy-karma
3. have a look at the transaction
What happens:
Transaction doesn't include python2-dnf
What should happen:
Transaction should include python2-dnf
Additional info:
The spec file
https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/fedora-easy-karma.git/tree/fedor...
states:
Recommends: python2-dnf
5:58 p.m.
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:54:43 -0000
"Christian Stadelmann" <genodeftest(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Still broken.
Steps to reproduce:
0. have updates-testing enabled
1. do not have python2-dnf installed
2. try to install fedora-easy-karma
3. have a look at the transaction
What happens:
Transaction doesn't include python2-dnf
What should happen:
Transaction should include python2-dnf
Additional info:
The spec file
https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/fedora-easy-karma.git/tree/fedor...
states: Recommends: python2-dnf
Sigh, yeah, it's still not there. ;(
Bodhi must be caching old updates repodata somewhere further.
Will dig into it more tomorrow/next week.
kevin
8:50 a.m.
I think this works now. At least the fedora-easy-karma bug is resolved and `dnf repoquery
--recommends fedora-easy-karma` lists python2-dnf. Thank you!
I've added a comment in https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120
too.
1:23 p.m.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:50:42 -0000
"Christian Stadelmann" <genodeftest(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I think this works now. At least the fedora-easy-karma bug is
resolved and `dnf repoquery --recommends fedora-easy-karma` lists
python2-dnf. Thank you!
I've added a comment in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120 too.
Puzzling. I didn't do anything that would have corrected this. ;(
Ah, it was submitted for stable. So, now that it's in the base repo
(generated by pungi) it has the weak deps.
I'll keep trying to figure out a way to invalidate the cache for the
rest of updates-testing.
kevin
2780
days inactive
2794
days old
12 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Christian Stadelmann -
Kevin Fenzi -
Parag Nemade