Hi All,
I posted two new packages for review. Feedback is highly appreciated :)
mk-configure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985
libmaa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257986
Some context:
I took the orphan package dictd. Dictd depends on libmaa. The dictd spec was pulling libmaa source and building it, and linking to it statically. Libmaa is not available as a package in Fedora.
I am separating them and making libmaa available as a dynamic library and its own package.
libmaa builds with mk-configure. The new dictd being developed builds with mk-configure as well. For that reason, I went ahead and created also that new mk-configure package.
Both packages are necessary to update dictd going forward.
Thank you, Carlos R F.
Hi All,
The bmake-based mk-configure package review is completed.
Could someone please review libmaa? It is a C language one.
Thank you, Carlos R.F.
On 1/13/24 12:10, Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez wrote:
Hi All,
I posted two new packages for review. Feedback is highly appreciated :)
mk-configure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985
libmaa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257986 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257986
Some context:
I took the orphan package dictd. Dictd depends on libmaa. The dictd spec was pulling libmaa source and building it, and linking to it statically. Libmaa is not available as a package in Fedora.
I am separating them and making libmaa available as a dynamic library and its own package.
libmaa builds with mk-configure. The new dictd being developed builds with mk-configure as well. For that reason, I went ahead and created also that new mk-configure package.
Both packages are necessary to update dictd going forward.
Thank you, Carlos R F.
-
Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez -
Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez