mass acl opening?

[Chris Weyl]

Where do we stand with the mass acl opening to 'uberpackager's?
Forgive me if I overlooked an announcement, but google isn't turning
anything up at the moment...

                                 -Chris

-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

[Mamoru Tasaka]

Chris Weyl wrote, at 09/11/2008 02:29 PM +9:00:
>  Where do we stand with the mass acl opening to
> 'uberpackager's?
>  Forgive me if I overlooked an announcement, but google isn't turning
>  anything up at the moment...
>  
>                                   -Chris
>   
Announced on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00007...

Regards,
Mamoru

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

> >>>> "MT" == Mamoru Tasaka
> <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; writes: 
MT> Announced on:
MT> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00007...

Well, yeah, except that the only part of that which is implemented is
the rename of "cvsextras" to "packager".  Mainly because the big
security thing intervened.  Currently nobody seems to know when the
rest of the process will happen.

 - J<

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "MT" == Mamoru Tasaka
> <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; writes:
>  
>  MT> Announced on:
>  MT> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00007...
>  
>  Well, yeah, except that the only part of that which is implemented is
>  the rename of "cvsextras" to "packager".  Mainly because the big
>  security thing intervened.  Currently nobody seems to know when the
>  rest of the process will happen.
>   
Casey,

Packager infrastructure is pretty much back now,  when do you want to
start the next phase?

-Toshio

[Casey Dahlin]

Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>  Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>    
> >>>>>> "MT" == Mamoru Tasaka
> <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; writes:
> >>>>>>               
> > MT> Announced on:
> > MT>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00007...
> >
> > Well, yeah, except that the only part of that which is implemented is
> > the rename of "cvsextras" to "packager".  Mainly because the big
> > security thing intervened.  Currently nobody seems to know when the
> > rest of the process will happen.
> >
> >     
>  Casey,
>
>  Packager infrastructure is pretty much back now,  when do you want to
>  start the next phase?
>
>  -Toshio
>
>
>     
We've seeded uberpackager already, and locked out packager, correct?

I'm good with going ahead asap.

--CJD

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Casey Dahlin wrote:
>  Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >  
> >>>>>>> "MT" == Mamoru Tasaka
> <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; writes:
> >>>>>>>               
> >> MT> Announced on:
> >> MT>
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00007...
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, yeah, except that the only part of that which is implemented is
> >> the rename of "cvsextras" to "packager".  Mainly because the
> big
> >> security thing intervened.  Currently nobody seems to know when the
> >> rest of the process will happen.
> >>
> >>     
> > Casey,
> >
> > Packager infrastructure is pretty much back now,  when do you want to
> > start the next phase?
> >
> > -Toshio
> >
> >
> >   
>  We've seeded uberpackager already, and locked out packager, correct?
>  
>  I'm good with going ahead asap.
>   
Locking out packager is the next step.

I can go ahead with that today.

From reading the announcement, that will just leave us with #4 left to do.

-Toshio

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Casey Dahlin wrote:
>  Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >  
> >>>>>>> "MT" == Mamoru Tasaka
> <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; writes:
> >>>>>>>               
> >> MT> Announced on:
> >> MT>
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00007...
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, yeah, except that the only part of that which is implemented is
> >> the rename of "cvsextras" to "packager".  Mainly because the
> big
> >> security thing intervened.  Currently nobody seems to know when the
> >> rest of the process will happen.
> >>
> >>     
> > Casey,
> >
> > Packager infrastructure is pretty much back now,  when do you want to
> > start the next phase?
> >
> > -Toshio
> >
> >
> >   
>  We've seeded uberpackager already, and locked out packager, correct?
>  
>  I'm good with going ahead asap.
>   
So I took a look at locking out packager and realized we'd talked about
several things in this regard.

1) Switching things so uberpackager gets the packager permissions
2) Setting packager to not have permission to commit
3) Locking down the defaults so uberpackager gets permission but
packager does not.
4) Changing the UI so packager doesn't show up as a group to give
permissions to.

These are all ready to go except #4.  Entirely my fault.  I'm going to
be gone today and probably large swathes of the weekend and we're
heading into a mini-freeze for the Fedora 10 Beta so rather than
destabilize things now, I'd like to delay this until after the freeze.

That means, I'll deploy this on our new staging infrastructure and push
it live the middle to later part of next week.

-Toshio

[Chris Weyl]

2008/9/12 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com&gt;:
>  Casey Dahlin wrote:
> > I'm good with going ahead asap.
> > 
[...snip...]
>  That means, I'll deploy this on our new staging infrastructure
> and push
>  it live the middle to later part of next week. 
Gentle, friendly "where are we?"  I know there are more important
things going on.

                                -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Chris Weyl wrote:
>  2008/9/12 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com&gt;:
> > Casey Dahlin wrote:
> >> I'm good with going ahead asap.
> >>
>  [...snip...]
> > That means, I'll deploy this on our new staging infrastructure and push
> > it live the middle to later part of next week.
>  
>  Gentle, friendly "where are we?"  I know there are more important
>  things going on.
>   
Beta's slip means that the infrastructure freeze is extended as well.
So we're still waiting in the wings.

-Toshio