Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-02-19)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto

or run:
  date -d '2024-02-19 19:30 UTC'

Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at: 
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =

(none)

= Followups =

(none)

= New business =

#3158 Change: Arm Minimal Image OS Build
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3158


= Open Floor = 

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.  The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

[Neal Gompa]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 9:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl&gt; wrote:
>  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>  FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
>  on Matrix.
>
>  To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
>    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
>  or run:
>    date -d '2024-02-19 19:30 UTC'
>
>  Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
>  https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda
>
>  = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
>
>  (none)
>
>  = Followups =
>
>  (none)
>
>  = New business =
>
>  #3158 Change: Arm Minimal Image OS Build
>  https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3158
>  
I've also added one more at the request of Adam Williamson during
blocker review:

#3169 Weigh in on installer storage setup issue
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3169




-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-02-19)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-0...
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-0...
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-0...
HTML Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-0...

Meeting summary
---------------
* TOPIC: Init Process
* TOPIC: 3158 Change: Arm Minimal Image OS Build
    * AGREED: punt this topic for a week
    Questions were and/or are to be asked in the ticket.

* TOPIC: 3169 Weigh in on installer storage setup issue
    * AGREED: Changes/AnacondaWebUIforFedoraWorkstation is postponed to F41.
     FESCo and QA will help arrange mass-testing early in the F41 cycle, shortly
     after F40 GA. (+5, 0, 0)

* TOPIC: Next week's chair
    * ACTION: zbyszek will chair next meeting

* TOPIC: Open Floor

Meeting ended at 2024-02-19 22:19:33

Action items
------------
* zbyszek will chair next meeting

[Mattia Verga]

Il 19/02/24 15:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
>  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>  FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
>  on Matrix.
>  
Can you also clarify who should run the Inactive provenpackagers policy 
(which was scheduled to be run the past week [1]) and the Inactive 
packagers policy (scheduled for tomorrow)? Or decide if you don't want 
to run them anymore.

For the past Fedora release I took care of both when I realized no one 
had run them. This time I'm asking just a little earlier...

Mattia

[1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-pm-tasks.html

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:26:24PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>  Il 19/02/24 15:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
>  > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>  > FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
>  > on Matrix.
>  >
>  Can you also clarify who should run the Inactive provenpackagers policy 
>  (which was scheduled to be run the past week [1]) and the Inactive 
>  packagers policy (scheduled for tomorrow)? Or decide if you don't want 
>  to run them anymore.
>  
>  For the past Fedora release I took care of both when I realized no one 
>  had run them. This time I'm asking just a little earlier... 
We didn't get to this, because we spent 2.8h on the first two issues.
But I think nobody will object if you do this again… We do
want to run them as planned.

Zbyszek

[Mattia Verga]

Il 19/02/24 23:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
>  On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:26:24PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> > Il 19/02/24 15:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
> >> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> >> FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
> >> on Matrix.
> >>
> > Can you also clarify who should run the Inactive provenpackagers policy
> > (which was scheduled to be run the past week [1]) and the Inactive
> > packagers policy (scheduled for tomorrow)? Or decide if you don't want
> > to run them anymore.
> >
> > For the past Fedora release I took care of both when I realized no one
> > had run them. This time I'm asking just a little earlier...
>  We didn't get to this, because we spent 2.8h on the first two issues.
>  But I think nobody will object if you do this again… We do
>  want to run them as planned.
>
>  Zbyszek 
Oh, ok. I'll start with the Inactive provenpackagers and I'll run the 
Inactive packagers as soon as I have enough time (the script usually 
takes 2-3 hours to complete).

Mattia

[Mattia Verga]

Il 20/02/24 19:52, Mattia Verga via devel ha scritto:
>  Il 19/02/24 23:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:26:24PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> Il 19/02/24 15:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
> >>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> >>> FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
> >>> on Matrix.
> >>>
> >> Can you also clarify who should run the Inactive provenpackagers policy
> >> (which was scheduled to be run the past week [1]) and the Inactive
> >> packagers policy (scheduled for tomorrow)? Or decide if you don't want
> >> to run them anymore.
> >>
> >> For the past Fedora release I took care of both when I realized no one
> >> had run them. This time I'm asking just a little earlier...
> > We didn't get to this, because we spent 2.8h on the first two issues.
> > But I think nobody will object if you do this again… We do
> > want to run them as planned.
> >
> > Zbyszek
>  Oh, ok. I'll start with the Inactive provenpackagers and I'll run the
>  Inactive packagers as soon as I have enough time (the script usually
>  takes 2-3 hours to complete).
>
>  Mattia
>  
FYI unfortunately, sending emails to <user&gt;(a)fedoraproject.org is 
currently broken [1]... My emails to affected provenpackagers were 
bounced back. I'll try to contact them directly looking to the email 
from noggin.

Mattia

[1] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768