The previous bug reports on the re0903.0 tree were very helpful - here's another one to chew on:
http://fedora.linux.duke.edu/FC3-re0908.0/
(As before, I just started syncing it, so it will be a while. Please make sure that any .iso's you download are dated today 2004-09-08 - the old ones in place there are from yesterday and are known-broken.)
Please see how it installs/runs if you get a chance. -- Elliot
Elliot Lee wrote:
The previous bug reports on the re0903.0 tree were very helpful - here's another one to chew on:
http://fedora.linux.duke.edu/FC3-re0908.0/
(As before, I just started syncing it, so it will be a while. Please make sure that any .iso's you download are dated today 2004-09-08 - the old ones in place there are from yesterday and are known-broken.)
Please see how it installs/runs if you get a chance. -- Elliot
For me x86_64 network install failed, but i386 worked on the same hardware. It somehow doens't recognize that my e1000 is a network card while in x86_64, so it keeps returning to that menu that tells you to select a driver or driver disk. =(
Is this filed anywhere?
Warren Togami wtogami@redhat.com
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:08:11PM -0400, Elliot Lee wrote:
The previous bug reports on the re0903.0 tree were very helpful - here's another one to chew on: http://fedora.linux.duke.edu/FC3-re0908.0/
I tried a fresh install on an IBM ThinkPad T42p with the 1600x1200 15" LCD and 128MB ATI FireGL Mobility T2 graphics card.
Install went better this time around. Graphical installer worked. I did a Custom install from CD's, Manual partition, formatting all system partitions from my previous install. A few points:
1. In rc0903, bootup hung on firstboot. Ctrl-Alt-Backspace was needed to continue bootup, skipping firstboot. Now in rc0908, bootup continues right past firstboot. I assume firstboot failed to run, but at least it didn't hang this time. The rhgb graphics displayed, followed by what looked like the X server reinitializing and the screen clearing to black. Then the X server was reinitialized again, and GDM appeared. /var/log/boot.log says: "firstboot: failed".
2. Possibly due to the above, switching from graphical login on VT7 to the text consoles on VT1-VT6 displayed blank text screens with a blinking cursor. The cursor moved with keyboard input. Mingetty was actually running, so I was able to login blind. After logging in as root, the text screen was "reset" somehow (by an /etc/profile script?), and all the previous and current text appeared...
3. dmesg says "kernel: radeonfb: Non-DDC laptop panel detected", but then says "kernel: radeonfb: detected LVDS panel size from BIOS: 1600x1200". However, xorg-x11 always starts in 800x600. Perhaps firstboot would offer the correct default resolution of 1600x1200 if it had worked? This is easily remedied by using System Settings->Display after logging in, changing Monitor Type from "Unknown monitor" to "Generic LCD Display / LCD Panel 1600x1200", and selecting Resolution: 1600x1200, and re-logging in.
4. Double-clicking the battery applet gives an error dialog: "The Suspend command '/usr/bin/apm -s' was unsuccessful."
5. I see xcdroast was replaced by k3b in the menu. This is good, because re0903's xcdroast didn't work (it spewed some error about /dev/sg* not found). I also found xcdroast hard to use (this was my first time seeing it).
However, why is k3b in "Sound & Video" and not "System Tools" or perhaps "Accessories"? It seems silly that k3b would be considered solely a Sound or Video application... Once I found k3b, I was impressed with its ease of use and proper functioning. I erased a CD-RW and burned an ISO image with no trouble or configuration required.
Good work so far--FC3 is going to be an exciting release. I'll find/file bugs for these issues soon...
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:08:11PM -0400, Elliot Lee wrote:
The previous bug reports on the re0903.0 tree were very helpful - here's another one to chew on:
This is still broken out-of-the-box for me since network interfaces are not getting addresses. Mmmmm... OK, they are getting addresses but NetworkManager is taking them away.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 01:02:53PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:08:11PM -0400, Elliot Lee wrote:
The previous bug reports on the re0903.0 tree were very helpful - here's another one to chew on:
This is still broken out-of-the-box for me since network interfaces are not getting addresses. Mmmmm... OK, they are getting addresses but NetworkManager is taking them away.
I'm seeing something similar. I get an IP address on bootup, and this works for "awhile". Then I lose connectivity. I noticed that dhclient was trying to renew with a unicast request directly to my dhcp server's IP address, but since there was no IP configured on the eth0 interface, it was failing. The NetworkManager service had died, leaving a stale /var/lock/subsys/ file around. Restarting the NetworkManager service fixed it.