Compose started at Wed Mar 25 06:01:03 UTC 2009
Updated Packages:
anaconda-11.5.0.37-1 -------------------- * Tue Mar 24 2009 David Cantrell dcantrell@redhat.com - 11.5.0.37-1 - Start with a basic /etc/hosts file (#491634) (dcantrell) - Do not flag every existing partition for resize (#491803) (dcantrell) - Remove unused noformatCB() function. (dcantrell) - Remove unnecessary istruefalse() function. (dcantrell) - Build new _isys.so for updates.img if needed. (dcantrell) - Get the UUID of each md array we create. (#491796) (dlehman) - Call udev_settle after committing changes to a disk (#491529) (hdegoede) - Be a little bit smarter about allocating space to grow parts. (#491761) (dlehman) - Check that partition is on the disk before trying to remove it. (#491997) (dlehman) - Work around a bug in mdadm incremental assembly. (dlehman) - Use the same units (MB) for extent size that we do for everything else. (dlehman) - Put line breaks in between crypttab entries. (#491938) (dlehman) - Register the NoDevFS class. (clumens) - fslabels -> labels. (clumens) - NFSDevice does not take exists= as a parameter. (clumens) - Override _setDevice and _getDevice in NFS. (clumens) - Move resolveDevice into the DeviceTree class. (clumens) - Move most of the parseFSTab logic into its own function. (clumens) - We don't even use partedUtils in this module. (clumens) - PReP formats can never be active. (#491865) (dlehman) - Move protectedPartition setup into storageInitialize (#491781). (clumens) - Use the mount and unmount methods on OpticalDevice.format now. (clumens) - Add a format for ISO9660 filesystems. (clumens) - getDeviceByName does not expect the CD device to start with "/dev/" (#491768). (clumens) - Write the same arch to .discinfo as iutil.getArch() gives us (#490977). (clumens) - Don't remove partitions twice. (jgranado)
festival-1.96-11.fc11 --------------------- * Tue Mar 24 2009 Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com - 1.96-11 - Drop the explicit dep on festival-voice, as it is redundant and causes problems with multiple providers
gdal-1.6.0-8.fc11 ----------------- * Mon Mar 23 2009 Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com - 1.6.0-8 - re-enable grass support
* Sun Mar 22 2009 Lubomir Rintel lkundrak@v3.sk - 1.6.0-7 - Depend specifically on GCJ for Java (Alex Lancaster) - Disable grass (Alex Lancaster) - Create %_bindir before copying files there
* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.6.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
grass-6.3.0-12.fc11 ------------------- * Mon Mar 23 2009 Lubomir Rintel lkundrak@v3.sk - 6.3.0-12 - Fix build with GCC 4.4
* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org - 6.3.0-11 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
kernel-2.6.29-0.258.2.3.rc8.git2.fc11 ------------------------------------- * Tue Mar 24 2009 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com - fsync replay fixes for btrfs
* Tue Mar 24 2009 Kyle McMartin kyle@redhat.com - F-11 beta branch - btrfs fixes + ide disk ppc fix. - add back in dropped stuff due to cvs flubbage.
* Tue Mar 24 2009 Kyle McMartin kyle@redhat.com 2.6.29-0.258.2.2.rc8.git2 - tag for beta.
* Tue Mar 24 2009 Kyle McMartin kyle@redhat.com 2.6.29-0.258.2.3.rc8.git2 - Disable DMAR by default, suspend & resume is unsupported in current code.
* Mon Mar 23 2009 Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com - build ide-gd_mod in on PPC (#491380)
mapnik-0.5.2-0.12.svn780.fc11 ----------------------------- * Tue Mar 24 2009 Alex Lancaster <alexlan[AT] fedoraproject org> - 0.5.2-0.12.svn780 - Add patch for compiling against GCC 4.4 - Fix file list for Python - Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat and macro
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.5.2-0.11.svn780 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
pfstools-1.7.0-5.fc11 --------------------- * Mon Mar 23 2009 Alex Lancaster <alexlan[AT]fedoraproject org> - 1.7.0-5 - Add patch to fix building with GCC 4.4
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com - 1.7.0-4 - recompile for hdf5 ABI change
pungi-2.0.13-1.fc11 ------------------- * Tue Mar 24 2009 Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com - 2.0.13-1 - Add online-docs to pkgorder
xastir-1.9.4-7.fc11 ------------------- * Tue Mar 10 2009 Lucian Langa cooly@gnome.eu.org - 1:1.9.4-7 - downgrade to the latest stable - add patch for english units
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.9.5-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 9 Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- libopensync-plugin-syncml-0.35-4.fc10.i386 requires libsyncml.so.0
Broken deps for x86_64 ---------------------------------------------------------- libopensync-plugin-syncml-0.35-4.fc10.x86_64 requires libsyncml.so.0()(64bit)
Broken deps for ppc ---------------------------------------------------------- libopensync-plugin-syncml-0.35-4.fc10.ppc requires libsyncml.so.0
Broken deps for ppc64 ---------------------------------------------------------- cabal2spec-0.12-1.fc11.noarch requires ghc > 0:6.10.1-7 libopensync-plugin-syncml-0.35-4.fc10.ppc64 requires libsyncml.so.0()(64bit)
Le Mer 25 mars 2009 11:29, Rawhide Report a écrit :
mapnik-0.5.2-0.12.svn780.fc11
- Tue Mar 24 2009 Alex Lancaster <alexlan[AT] fedoraproject org> -
- Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat and macro
Why the hell is a dep on this added now? Is the package name, description, the pages of wiki help and months of repeated bugzilla tickets and information mails not sufficient to make clear THIS SHOULD NOT BE DONE?
"NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> Le Mer 25 mars 2009 11:29, Rawhide Report a écrit :
mapnik-0.5.2-0.12.svn780.fc11
- Tue Mar 24 2009 Alex Lancaster <alexlan[AT] fedoraproject org> -
- Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat and macro
NM> Why the hell is a dep on this added now? Is the package name, NM> description, the pages of wiki help and months of repeated bugzilla NM> tickets and information mails not sufficient to make clear THIS SHOULD NM> NOT BE DONE?
The broken deps that made mapnik completely uninstallable (it had "Requires: dejavu-fonts-sans") needed to be fixed quickly for the f11-beta by rel-eng (because of closed ACLs). I'm not the primary maintainer of the package (who is non-responsive) and hence probably not on the bugzilla tickets. I wasn't aware that the -compat package was only temporary.
In any case, I can easily fix this before the final release, the package ACLs should be opened up before then.
Alex
On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 at 20:36, Alex Lancaster wrote:
"NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> Le Mer 25 mars 2009 11:29, Rawhide Report a écrit :
mapnik-0.5.2-0.12.svn780.fc11
- Tue Mar 24 2009 Alex Lancaster <alexlan[AT] fedoraproject org> -
- Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat and macro
NM> Why the hell is a dep on this added now? Is the package name, NM> description, the pages of wiki help and months of repeated bugzilla NM> tickets and information mails not sufficient to make clear THIS SHOULD NM> NOT BE DONE?
The broken deps that made mapnik completely uninstallable (it had "Requires: dejavu-fonts-sans") needed to be fixed quickly for the f11-beta by rel-eng (because of closed ACLs). I'm not the primary maintainer of the package (who is non-responsive) and hence probably not on the bugzilla tickets.
If the maintainer is non-responsive then the appropriate procedure[1] should be initiated to take the package over.
Regards, R.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
"DM" == Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski writes:
[...]
The broken deps that made mapnik completely uninstallable (it had "Requires: dejavu-fonts-sans") needed to be fixed quickly for the f11-beta by rel-eng (because of closed ACLs). I'm not the primary maintainer of the package (who is non-responsive) and hence probably not on the bugzilla tickets.
DM> If the maintainer is non-responsive then the appropriate procedure[1] should DM> be initiated to take the package over.
That has indeed already been done and is in progress:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg01301.html
I have yet to hear back from anybody who has been able to contact this particular maintainer.
The opening up of ACLs to provenpackager is orthogonal to this issue. As agreed in FESCo meeting, maintainers have two weeks to file reasons that their packages are still closed, otherwise they will be opened up:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/10#comment:10
Alex