Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 14:33 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit :
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 08:46 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 11:16 +0100, Caolan McNamara wrote:
> > I'm packaging jfreereport and one of the dependencies is a java package
> > called "libxml",
> > i.e. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=51669
> > "LibXML is a namespace aware SAX-Parser" and is no relation to the c
> > libxml/libxml2. What's an acceptable name for the package given that
> > "libxml" is taken, libxml-java ? libxml-jfreereport ?
>
> That's unfortunate that they decided to stomp on someone else's name.
It's unfortunate that Java folks feel they have to reimplement the
world, regardless of the nomenclature they use.
You mean, unlike the perl or lisp guys?
There is a lot of bad things to be said about Java but this particular
failure is not Java-specific.
--
Nicolas Mailhot