Fedora 24 Mass Rebuild

[Dennis Gilmore]

Hi all,

Per the Fedora 24 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora 24
very shortly.  We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 24 for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC6

we will start the mass rebuild on 2016-02-03

This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over
when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats.
please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.

You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on freenode.

Failures can be seen 
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f24-failures.html

Things still needing rebuilt 
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f24-need-rebuild.html

Regards

Dennis

_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]...

[Dave Johansen]

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us&gt; wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
>  Per the Fedora 24 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
>  Fedora 24
>  very shortly.  We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 24 for
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC6
>
>  we will start the mass rebuild on 2016-02-03
>
>  This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over
>  when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats.
>  please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
>
>  You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on freenode.
>
>  Failures can be seen
>  http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f24-failures.html
>  
What's the correct way to handle fixes for failed builds? Just commit them
to SCM? Or does a rebuild have to be manually initiated?
Thanks,
Dave

[Peter Robinson]

On 4 Feb 2016 7:06 pm, "Dave Johansen" <davejohansen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us&gt; wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora 24 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for 
Fedora 24
> > very shortly.  We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 24 for
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC6
> >
> > we will start the mass rebuild on 2016-02-03
> >
> > This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over
> > when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats.
> > please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
> >
> > You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on freenode.
> >
> > Failures can be seen
> > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f24-failures.html
>
>
>  What's the correct way to handle fixes for failed builds? Just commit 
them to
SCM? Or does a rebuild have to be manually initiated?

Just commit and push as normal. Fixes are just processed as usual.

Peter

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Wednesday, February 03, 2016 09:40:22 AM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  Hi all,
>  
>  Per the Fedora 24 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
>  24 very shortly.  We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 24 for
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC6
>  
>  we will start the mass rebuild on 2016-02-03
>  
>  This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over
>  when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats.
>  please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
>  
>  You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on freenode.
>  
>  Failures can be seen
>  http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f24-failures.html
>  
>  Things still needing rebuilt
>  http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f24-need-rebuild.html
>  
>  Regards
>  
>  Dennis 
The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged into f24, 
there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package 
maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.

Thanks

Dennis

_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]...

[Nathanael D. Noblet]

>  On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us&gt;
> wrote:
>  
>  The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged into f24, 
>  there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package 
>  maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly. 
Awesome! Two questions.

#1) If one of my packages failed the rpmlint check but I accidentally deleted the email,
is it there a way to find which one?

#2) Not sure how the rpmlint notification system is setup, but I found it odd that I
received notification of packages that passed. Really why send those? Or is it something I
can configure what type of notification I would want?

— 
Nathanael

[gil]

Il 06/02/2016 22:03, Nathanael Noblet ha scritto:
> > On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore
> <dennis(a)ausil.us&gt; wrote:
> >
> > The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged into f24,
> > there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package
> > maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.
>  Awesome! Two questions.
>
>  #1) If one of my packages failed the rpmlint check but I accidentally deleted the email,
> is it there a way to find which one?
>
>  #2) Not sure how the rpmlint notification system is setup, but I found it odd that I
> received notification of packages that passed. Really why send those? Or is it something I
> can configure what type of notification I would want?
>
>  —
>  Nathanael
>
>  
hi
I have not received any notification regarding FTBFS even if it is set 
to "Builds failing" for Koji
regards
.g
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 14:03:36 -0700
Nathanael Noblet <nathanael(a)gnat.ca&gt; wrote:

>  > On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore
> <dennis(a)ausil.us&gt; wrote:
>  > 
>  > The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged
>  > into f24, there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be
>  > addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed
>  > shortly.  
>  
>  Awesome! Two questions.
>  
>  #1) If one of my packages failed the rpmlint check but I accidentally
>  deleted the email, is it there a way to find which one? 
Well, I don't see a way to get that info for every package owned by one
person, but you can see the list of rpmlint check failures at: 

https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results?item:like=%25%25&am...

>  #2) Not sure how the rpmlint notification system is setup, but I
>  found it odd that I received notification of packages that passed.
>  Really why send those? Or is it something I can configure what type
>  of notification I would want? 
It seems there's only triggers on 'new result' or 'particular type of
task'. I think it would be nice to be able to filter on failed or
success too. 

Filed a issue on it: 
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/issues/356

You can adjust all the other filters at FMN: 
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/

kevin

[Kamil Paral]

>  > #2) Not sure how the rpmlint notification system is setup, but
> I
>  > found it odd that I received notification of packages that passed.
>  > Really why send those? Or is it something I can configure what type
>  > of notification I would want?
>  
>  It seems there's only triggers on 'new result' or 'particular type of
>  task'. I think it would be nice to be able to filter on failed or
>  success too.
>  
>  Filed a issue on it:
>  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/issues/356 
I added a reply to that github ticket. TLDR: Sorry, we're working on it.

[Yaakov Selkowitz]

On 2016-02-06 00:08, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged
> into f24,
>  there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package
>  maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly. 
Is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208 the intended 
tracker for these?  If so, per past mass rebuilds, a F24FTBFS alias 
would be helpful.  However, there are only a handful of bugs filed so far.

-- 
Yaakov Selkowitz
Associate Software Engineer, ARM
Red Hat, Inc.

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Thursday, February 11, 2016 08:52:53 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>  On 2016-02-06 00:08, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  > The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged into
>  > f24, there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by
>  > the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.
>  
>  Is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208 the intended
>  tracker for these?  If so, per past mass rebuilds, a F24FTBFS alias
>  would be helpful.  However, there are only a handful of bugs filed so far. 
There is an issue with syncing from fas to bugzilla. The releng user can not 
link the bugs to the tracker as it has no permissions so bugs are not yet 
filed

Dennis

[Mattias Ellert]

tor 2016-02-11 klockan 20:52 -0600 skrev Yaakov Selkowitz:
>  On 2016-02-06 00:08, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  > The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged
>  > into f24,
>  > there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by
>  > the package
>  > maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.
>  
>  Is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208 the intended 
>  tracker for these?  If so, per past mass rebuilds, a F24FTBFS alias 
>  would be helpful.  However, there are only a handful of bugs filed so
>  far. 
I didn't see it announce anywhere - though I might have missed it - but
I found the list of failed builds here:

http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f24-failures.html

	Mattias