rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

[arnaud gaboury]

I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.

The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
Fedora R package[1].

I setup the directory structure:
% ls ~/.rpmbuild
BUILD/  BUILDROOT/  RPMS/  SOURCES/  SPECS/  SRPMS/

Then:

% cd ~/.rpmbuild
% rpmlint SPEC/R.spec  ==> OK
% rpmbuild -ba SPEC/R.spec
...... BUILD ....
Processing files: R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: R-KernSmooth = 2.23.15 R-MASS = 7.3.43 R-Matrix = 1.2.2
R-base = 3.2.1 R-boot = 1.3.17 R-class = 7.3.13 R-cluster = 2.0.3
R-codetools = 0.2.14 R-core = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-core(x86-64) =
3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-datasets = 3.2.1 R-foreign = 0.8.65 R-grDevices =
3.2.1 R-graphics = 3.2.1 R-grid = 3.2.1 R-lattice = 0.20.33 R-methods
= 3.2.1 R-mgcv = 1.8.7 R-nlme = 3.1.121 R-nnet = 7.3.10 R-parallel =
3.2.1 R-rpart = 4.1.10 R-spatial = 7.3.10 R-splines = 3.2.1 R-stats =
3.2.1 R-stats4 = 3.2.1 R-survival = 2.38.3 R-tcltk = 3.2.1 R-tools =
3.2.1 R-utils = 3.2.1 config(R-core) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libR.so()(64bit)
libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit)
Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires(post): /bin/sh
Requires(preun): /bin/sh
Requires(postun): /bin/sh
Requires(posttrans): /bin/sh
Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libR.so()(64bit)
libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit)
libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.16)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libicui18n.so.54()(64bit) libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)
libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) libifport.so.5()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libiomp5.so()(64bit)
libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) libirc.so()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit)
liblzma.so.5()(64bit) liblzma.so.5(XZ_5.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpcre.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsvml.so()(64bit)
libtcl8.6.so()(64bit) libtk8.6.so()(64bit) libtre.so.5()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
Obsoletes: R-Matrix < 0.999375-7
Processing files: R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: R-Matrix-devel = 1.2.2 R-core-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
R-core-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libR) = 3.2.1
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
Obsoletes: R-Matrix-devel < 0.999375-7
Processing files: R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a2fYbJ
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd R-3.2.1
+
DOCDIR=/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
+ cp -pr doc/COPYING
/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
+ exit 0
Provides: libRmath = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
libRmath.so()(64bit)
Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
libsvml.so()(64bit)
Processing files: libRmath-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: libRmath-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-devel(x86-64) =
3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libRmath) = 3.2.1
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
Processing files: libRmath-static-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: libRmath-static = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-static(x86-64) =
3.2.1-mkl.fc22
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Processing files: R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
......................................................

These last lines are part of the %file section, and I can't see any
error, all %files (it is a meta package) are correctly processed.

% ls RPMS
%
 % ls BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
etc/  usr/

RPMS is empty.

I do not understand why. Is there anything in my shell environment who
prevents populating RPMS ?
poisonivy@poppy ➤➤ ~/rpmbuild % env
HOME=/home/poisonivy
USER=poisonivy
SHELL=/bin/zsh
TERM=xterm
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/home/poisonivy/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/opt/intel/bin
MAIL=/var/spool/mail/poisonivy
LOGNAME=poisonivy
XDG_SESSION_ID=c3
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/1000
SHLVL=1
PWD=/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild
OLDPWD=/home/poisonivy
HISTCONTROL=ignoredups
HOSTNAME=poppy
HISTSIZE=5000
LS_COLORS=
XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/home/poisonivy/.config
XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=/etc/xdg
XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/local/share:/usr/share
XDG_DATA_HOME=/home/poisonivy/.local/share
EDITOR=vim
VISUAL=vim
CCACHE_DIR=/storage/.ccache
USE_CCACHE=1
PASSWORD_STORE_DIR=/home/poisonivy/.config/password-store
PGDATA=/db/pgsql/data
PGROOT=/db/pgsql
GEM_HOME=/home/poisonivy/.gem/ruby
CODE=/storage/development/language
R_PROFILE_USER=/home/poisonivy/.config/r/Rprofile.r
R_ENVIRON_USER=/home/poisonivy/.config/r/Renviron
R_LIBS_USER=/storage/development/language/r/library
WORKON_HOME=/storage/development/language/python/envs/poisonivy
LANG=en_US.UTF8
LESSOPEN=||/usr/bin/lesspipe.sh %s
ZDOTDIR=/home/poisonivy/.config/zsh
GNUPGHOME=/home/poisonivy/.config/gnupg
_VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_API= mkvirtualenv rmvirtualenv lsvirtualenv
showvirtualenv workon add2virtualenv cdsitepackages cdvirtualenv
lssitepackages toggleglobalsitepackages cpvirtualenv
setvirtualenvproject mkproject cdproject mktmpenv
VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_SCRIPT=/bin/virtualenvwrapper.sh
ZSHDIR=/home/poisonivy/.config/zsh
VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_PROJECT_FILENAME=.project
VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_WORKON_CD=1
VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_HOOK_DIR=/storage/development/language/python/envs/poisonivy
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.109/linux/compiler/lib/intel64_lin:/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.9/mkl/lib/intel64_lin
_=/bin/env

Did I missed any step in my SPEC file ? The file is attached.

Thank you for help.
-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[arnaud gaboury]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:58 PM, arnaud gaboury
<arnaud.gaboury(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>
>  The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
>  and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
>  Fedora R package[1].
>
>  I setup the directory structure:
>  % ls ~/.rpmbuild
>  BUILD/  BUILDROOT/  RPMS/  SOURCES/  SPECS/  SRPMS/
>
>  Then:
>
>  % cd ~/.rpmbuild
>  % rpmlint SPEC/R.spec  ==> OK
>  % rpmbuild -ba SPEC/R.spec
>  ...... BUILD ....
>  Processing files: R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Processing files: R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Provides: R-KernSmooth = 2.23.15 R-MASS = 7.3.43 R-Matrix = 1.2.2
>  R-base = 3.2.1 R-boot = 1.3.17 R-class = 7.3.13 R-cluster = 2.0.3
>  R-codetools = 0.2.14 R-core = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-core(x86-64) =
>  3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-datasets = 3.2.1 R-foreign = 0.8.65 R-grDevices =
>  3.2.1 R-graphics = 3.2.1 R-grid = 3.2.1 R-lattice = 0.20.33 R-methods
>  = 3.2.1 R-mgcv = 1.8.7 R-nlme = 3.1.121 R-nnet = 7.3.10 R-parallel =
>  3.2.1 R-rpart = 4.1.10 R-spatial = 7.3.10 R-splines = 3.2.1 R-stats =
>  3.2.1 R-stats4 = 3.2.1 R-survival = 2.38.3 R-tcltk = 3.2.1 R-tools =
>  3.2.1 R-utils = 3.2.1 config(R-core) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libR.so()(64bit)
>  libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit)
>  Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
>  Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
>  Requires(post): /bin/sh
>  Requires(preun): /bin/sh
>  Requires(postun): /bin/sh
>  Requires(posttrans): /bin/sh
>  Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
>  ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libR.so()(64bit)
>  libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit)
>  libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.16)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
>  libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
>  libicui18n.so.54()(64bit) libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)
>  libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) libifport.so.5()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
>  libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libiomp5.so()(64bit)
>  libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) libirc.so()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit)
>  liblzma.so.5()(64bit) liblzma.so.5(XZ_5.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
>  libpcre.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
>  libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
>  librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsvml.so()(64bit)
>  libtcl8.6.so()(64bit) libtk8.6.so()(64bit) libtre.so.5()(64bit)
>  libz.so.1()(64bit)
>  Obsoletes: R-Matrix < 0.999375-7
>  Processing files: R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Provides: R-Matrix-devel = 1.2.2 R-core-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
>  R-core-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libR) = 3.2.1
>  Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
>  Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
>  Obsoletes: R-Matrix-devel < 0.999375-7
>  Processing files: R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Processing files: R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Processing files: R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Processing files: libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a2fYbJ
>  + umask 022
>  + cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD
>  + cd R-3.2.1
>  +
> DOCDIR=/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
>  + export DOCDIR
>  + /usr/bin/mkdir -p
>  /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
>  + cp -pr doc/COPYING
>  /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
>  + exit 0
>  Provides: libRmath = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
>  libRmath.so()(64bit)
>  Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
>  Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
>  Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
>  Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
>  Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
>  libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
>  libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
>  libsvml.so()(64bit)
>  Processing files: libRmath-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Provides: libRmath-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-devel(x86-64) =
>  3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libRmath) = 3.2.1
>  Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
>  Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
>  Processing files: libRmath-static-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Provides: libRmath-static = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-static(x86-64) =
>  3.2.1-mkl.fc22
>  Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
>  Processing files: R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
>  ......................................................
>
>  These last lines are part of the %file section, and I can't see any
>  error, all %files (it is a meta package) are correctly processed.
>
>  % ls RPMS
>  %
>   % ls BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>  etc/  usr/
>
>  RPMS is empty.
>
>  I do not understand why. Is there anything in my shell environment who
>  prevents populating RPMS ?
>  poisonivy@poppy ➤➤ ~/rpmbuild % env
>  HOME=/home/poisonivy
>  USER=poisonivy
>  SHELL=/bin/zsh
>  TERM=xterm
>
> PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/home/poisonivy/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/opt/intel/bin
>  MAIL=/var/spool/mail/poisonivy
>  LOGNAME=poisonivy
>  XDG_SESSION_ID=c3
>  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/1000
>  SHLVL=1
>  PWD=/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild
>  OLDPWD=/home/poisonivy
>  HISTCONTROL=ignoredups
>  HOSTNAME=poppy
>  HISTSIZE=5000
>  LS_COLORS=
>  XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/home/poisonivy/.config
>  XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=/etc/xdg
>  XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/local/share:/usr/share
>  XDG_DATA_HOME=/home/poisonivy/.local/share
>  EDITOR=vim
>  VISUAL=vim
>  CCACHE_DIR=/storage/.ccache
>  USE_CCACHE=1
>  PASSWORD_STORE_DIR=/home/poisonivy/.config/password-store
>  PGDATA=/db/pgsql/data
>  PGROOT=/db/pgsql
>  GEM_HOME=/home/poisonivy/.gem/ruby
>  CODE=/storage/development/language
>  R_PROFILE_USER=/home/poisonivy/.config/r/Rprofile.r
>  R_ENVIRON_USER=/home/poisonivy/.config/r/Renviron
>  R_LIBS_USER=/storage/development/language/r/library
>  WORKON_HOME=/storage/development/language/python/envs/poisonivy
>  LANG=en_US.UTF8
>  LESSOPEN=||/usr/bin/lesspipe.sh %s
>  ZDOTDIR=/home/poisonivy/.config/zsh
>  GNUPGHOME=/home/poisonivy/.config/gnupg
>  _VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_API= mkvirtualenv rmvirtualenv lsvirtualenv
>  showvirtualenv workon add2virtualenv cdsitepackages cdvirtualenv
>  lssitepackages toggleglobalsitepackages cpvirtualenv
>  setvirtualenvproject mkproject cdproject mktmpenv
>  VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_SCRIPT=/bin/virtualenvwrapper.sh
>  ZSHDIR=/home/poisonivy/.config/zsh
>  VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_PROJECT_FILENAME=.project
>  VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_WORKON_CD=1
>  VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_HOOK_DIR=/storage/development/language/python/envs/poisonivy
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.109/linux/compiler/lib/intel64_lin:/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.9/mkl/lib/intel64_lin
>  _=/bin/env
>
>  Did I missed any step in my SPEC file ? The file is attached.
>
>  Thank you for help. 
[0]https://cran.r-project.org/
[1]http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/R.git/
>  --
>
>  google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:58:38 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:

>  Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
>  ......................................................
>  
>  These last lines are part of the %file section, 
Why have you deleted the lines?
What did they tell?

You've quoted lots of irrelevant output from rpmbuild. Relevant would
be the output from the %install section and the check-files phase.
It examines the %buildroot and compares the contents with all your
%files sections. Every file in the %buildroot must be covered by
your %files sections. And the %files sections must not list any
files not found in the %buildroot. It's really simple.

[arnaud gaboury]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:58:38 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> > ......................................................
> >
> > These last lines are part of the %file section,
>
>  Why have you deleted the lines?
>  What did they tell? 
I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output
when running rpmbuild. I thereafter come back to command shell.


>  You've quoted lots of irrelevant output from rpmbuild. 
the build process is
nearly 10 minutes, so I won't put all screen output

Relevant would
>  be the output from the %install section and the check-files phase.
>  It examines the %buildroot and compares the contents with all your
>  %files sections. Every file in the %buildroot must be covered by
>  your %files sections. And the %files sections must not list any
>  files not found in the %buildroot. 
The spec file is attached in my first post

What kind of output can I provide to get something more helpful than
just : it is really simple ?


>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:47:44 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:

>  >> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
>  >> ......................................................
>  >>
>  >> These last lines are part of the %file section,
>  >
>  > Why have you deleted the lines?
>  > What did they tell?
>  
>  I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output
>  when running rpmbuild. I thereafter come back to command shell. 
Which are the "last few lines"?

You refer to "These last lines are part of the %file section".
Which last lines are that? I don't see any lines that refer to your
%files section.

Also, normally the check-files script is called with the buildroot
as the first argument. In your output that's missing. Is the output
truncated or not?

>  The spec file is attached in my first post 
It's not too readable due to strange formatting. And I won't spend
time on trying to reproduce your entire build environment.

>  What kind of output can I provide to get something more helpful than
>  just : it is really simple ? 
If not the full rpmbuild output (upload it to fpaste.org for example)
or really the end of the output from %install to %clean.

[arnaud gaboury]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:47:44 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > >> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> > >> ......................................................
> > >>
> > >> These last lines are part of the %file section,
> > >
> > > Why have you deleted the lines?
> > > What did they tell?
> >
> > I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output
> > when running rpmbuild. I thereafter come back to command shell.
>
>  Which are the "last few lines"? 
Below is the last part of rpmbuild screen output:
% cd ~/.rpmbuild
% rpmlint SPEC/R.spec  ==> OK
% rpmbuild -ba SPEC/R.spec
...... BUILD ....
Processing files: R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: R-KernSmooth = 2.23.15 R-MASS = 7.3.43 R-Matrix = 1.2.2
R-base = 3.2.1 R-boot = 1.3.17 R-class = 7.3.13 R-cluster = 2.0.3
R-codetools = 0.2.14 R-core = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-core(x86-64) =
3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-datasets = 3.2.1 R-foreign = 0.8.65 R-grDevices =
3.2.1 R-graphics = 3.2.1 R-grid = 3.2.1 R-lattice = 0.20.33 R-methods
= 3.2.1 R-mgcv = 1.8.7 R-nlme = 3.1.121 R-nnet = 7.3.10 R-parallel =
3.2.1 R-rpart = 4.1.10 R-spatial = 7.3.10 R-splines = 3.2.1 R-stats =
3.2.1 R-stats4 = 3.2.1 R-survival = 2.38.3 R-tcltk = 3.2.1 R-tools =
3.2.1 R-utils = 3.2.1 config(R-core) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libR.so()(64bit)
libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit)
Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires(post): /bin/sh
Requires(preun): /bin/sh
Requires(postun): /bin/sh
Requires(posttrans): /bin/sh
Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libR.so()(64bit)
libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit)
libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.16)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libicui18n.so.54()(64bit) libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)
libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) libifport.so.5()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libiomp5.so()(64bit)
libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) libirc.so()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit)
liblzma.so.5()(64bit) liblzma.so.5(XZ_5.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpcre.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsvml.so()(64bit)
libtcl8.6.so()(64bit) libtk8.6.so()(64bit) libtre.so.5()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
Obsoletes: R-Matrix < 0.999375-7
Processing files: R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: R-Matrix-devel = 1.2.2 R-core-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
R-core-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libR) = 3.2.1
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
Obsoletes: R-Matrix-devel < 0.999375-7
Processing files: R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Processing files: libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a2fYbJ
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd R-3.2.1
+
DOCDIR=/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
+ cp -pr doc/COPYING
/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
+ exit 0
Provides: libRmath = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
libRmath.so()(64bit)
Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
libsvml.so()(64bit)
Processing files: libRmath-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: libRmath-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-devel(x86-64) =
3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libRmath) = 3.2.1
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
Processing files: libRmath-static-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
Provides: libRmath-static = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-static(x86-64) =
3.2.1-mkl.fc22
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Processing files: R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64


>  You refer to "These last lines are part of the %file section".
>  Which last lines are that? I don't see any lines that refer to your
>  %files section. 
When I refer to %file section is beacuse I have been watching all
outputs, no errors during %configure, %build and %install. I "guess"
(maybe I am wrong) that the build would have stoped before the %file
section in case of errors.
>  Also, normally the check-files script is called with the buildroot
>  as the first argument. In your output that's missing. Is the output
>  truncated or not? 
YES it is.
> > The spec file is attached in my first post
>
>  It's not too readable due to strange formatting. And I won't spend
>  time on trying to reproduce your entire build environment. 

> > What kind of output can I provide to get something more helpful than
> > just : it is really simple ?
>
>  If not the full rpmbuild output (upload it to fpaste.org for example)
>  or really the end of the output from %install to %clean. 
Will try to build again and catch these parts
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 15/09/15 18:31 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Michael Schwendt
> <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:47:44 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >
> >> >> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> >> >> ......................................................
> >> >>
> >> >> These last lines are part of the %file section,
> >> >
> >> > Why have you deleted the lines?
> >> > What did they tell?
> >>
> >> I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output
> >> when running rpmbuild. I thereafter come back to command shell.
> >
> > Which are the "last few lines"?
>
> Below is the last part of rpmbuild screen output:
> % cd ~/.rpmbuild
> % rpmlint SPEC/R.spec  ==> OK
> % rpmbuild -ba SPEC/R.spec
> ...... BUILD ....
> Processing files: R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Provides: R-KernSmooth = 2.23.15 R-MASS = 7.3.43 R-Matrix = 1.2.2
> R-base = 3.2.1 R-boot = 1.3.17 R-class = 7.3.13 R-cluster = 2.0.3
> R-codetools = 0.2.14 R-core = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-core(x86-64) =
> 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-datasets = 3.2.1 R-foreign = 0.8.65 R-grDevices =
> 3.2.1 R-graphics = 3.2.1 R-grid = 3.2.1 R-lattice = 0.20.33 R-methods
> = 3.2.1 R-mgcv = 1.8.7 R-nlme = 3.1.121 R-nnet = 7.3.10 R-parallel =
> 3.2.1 R-rpart = 4.1.10 R-spatial = 7.3.10 R-splines = 3.2.1 R-stats =
> 3.2.1 R-stats4 = 3.2.1 R-survival = 2.38.3 R-tcltk = 3.2.1 R-tools =
> 3.2.1 R-utils = 3.2.1 config(R-core) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libR.so()(64bit)
> libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit)
> Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires(post): /bin/sh
> Requires(preun): /bin/sh
> Requires(postun): /bin/sh
> Requires(posttrans): /bin/sh
> Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
> ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libR.so()(64bit)
> libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.16)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
> libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
> libicui18n.so.54()(64bit) libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)
> libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) libifport.so.5()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
> libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libiomp5.so()(64bit)
> libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) libirc.so()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit)
> liblzma.so.5()(64bit) liblzma.so.5(XZ_5.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
> libpcre.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
> librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsvml.so()(64bit)
> libtcl8.6.so()(64bit) libtk8.6.so()(64bit) libtre.so.5()(64bit)
> libz.so.1()(64bit)
> Obsoletes: R-Matrix < 0.999375-7
> Processing files: R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Provides: R-Matrix-devel = 1.2.2 R-core-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> R-core-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libR) = 3.2.1
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> Obsoletes: R-Matrix-devel < 0.999375-7
> Processing files: R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a2fYbJ
> + umask 022
> + cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD
> + cd R-3.2.1
> +
> DOCDIR=/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
> + export DOCDIR
> + /usr/bin/mkdir -p
> /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
> + cp -pr doc/COPYING
> /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
> + exit 0
> Provides: libRmath = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> libRmath.so()(64bit)
> Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
> Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
> Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
> libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
> libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
> libsvml.so()(64bit)
> Processing files: libRmath-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Provides: libRmath-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-devel(x86-64) =
> 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libRmath) = 3.2.1
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> Processing files: libRmath-static-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Provides: libRmath-static = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-static(x86-64) =
> 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Processing files: R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64 
Either you are still not showing the full output or something went
wrong, the last few lines of output should look like this:

Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/home/jwakely/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.x86_64
Wrote: /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
Wrote: /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tvLFga
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd pstreams-0.8.1
+ rm -rf
/home/jwakely/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.x86_64
+ exit 0


i.e. you should see "Wrote: " telling you where the RPM files are, and
then "exit 0" at the very end.

[arnaud gaboury]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  On 15/09/15 18:31 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt;
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:47:44 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >>
> >>> >> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> >>> >> ......................................................
> >>> >>
> >>> >> These last lines are part of the %file section,
> >>> >
> >>> > Why have you deleted the lines?
> >>> > What did they tell?
> >>>
> >>> I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output
> >>> when running rpmbuild. I thereafter come back to command shell.
> >>
> >>
> >> Which are the "last few lines"?
> >
> >
> > Below is the last part of rpmbuild screen output:
> > % cd ~/.rpmbuild
> > % rpmlint SPEC/R.spec  ==> OK
> > % rpmbuild -ba SPEC/R.spec
> > ...... BUILD ....
> > Processing files: R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Provides: R-KernSmooth = 2.23.15 R-MASS = 7.3.43 R-Matrix = 1.2.2
> > R-base = 3.2.1 R-boot = 1.3.17 R-class = 7.3.13 R-cluster = 2.0.3
> > R-codetools = 0.2.14 R-core = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-core(x86-64) =
> > 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-datasets = 3.2.1 R-foreign = 0.8.65 R-grDevices =
> > 3.2.1 R-graphics = 3.2.1 R-grid = 3.2.1 R-lattice = 0.20.33 R-methods
> > = 3.2.1 R-mgcv = 1.8.7 R-nlme = 3.1.121 R-nnet = 7.3.10 R-parallel =
> > 3.2.1 R-rpart = 4.1.10 R-spatial = 7.3.10 R-splines = 3.2.1 R-stats =
> > 3.2.1 R-stats4 = 3.2.1 R-survival = 2.38.3 R-tcltk = 3.2.1 R-tools =
> > 3.2.1 R-utils = 3.2.1 config(R-core) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libR.so()(64bit)
> > libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit)
> > Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Requires(post): /bin/sh
> > Requires(preun): /bin/sh
> > Requires(postun): /bin/sh
> > Requires(posttrans): /bin/sh
> > Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
> > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libR.so()(64bit)
> > libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> > libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.16)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
> > libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
> > libicui18n.so.54()(64bit) libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)
> > libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) libifport.so.5()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
> > libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libiomp5.so()(64bit)
> > libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) libirc.so()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit)
> > liblzma.so.5()(64bit) liblzma.so.5(XZ_5.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
> > libpcre.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> > libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
> > librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsvml.so()(64bit)
> > libtcl8.6.so()(64bit) libtk8.6.so()(64bit) libtre.so.5()(64bit)
> > libz.so.1()(64bit)
> > Obsoletes: R-Matrix < 0.999375-7
> > Processing files: R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Provides: R-Matrix-devel = 1.2.2 R-core-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> > R-core-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libR) = 3.2.1
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > Obsoletes: R-Matrix-devel < 0.999375-7
> > Processing files: R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a2fYbJ
> > + umask 022
> > + cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD
> > + cd R-3.2.1
> > +
> >
> DOCDIR=/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
> > + export DOCDIR
> > + /usr/bin/mkdir -p
> >
> > /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
> > + cp -pr doc/COPYING
> >
> > /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libRmath
> > + exit 0
> > Provides: libRmath = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> > libRmath.so()(64bit)
> > Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
> > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
> > Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
> > libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
> > libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
> > libsvml.so()(64bit)
> > Processing files: libRmath-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Provides: libRmath-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-devel(x86-64) =
> > 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libRmath) = 3.2.1
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > Processing files: libRmath-static-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Provides: libRmath-static = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libRmath-static(x86-64) =
> > 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Processing files: R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
>
>
>  Either you are still not showing the full output or something went
>  wrong, the last few lines of output should look like this:
>
>  Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
>  /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.x86_64
>  Wrote: /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
>  Wrote:
>  /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
>  Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tvLFga
>  + umask 022
>  + cd /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/BUILD
>  + cd pstreams-0.8.1
>  + rm -rf
>  /home/jwakely/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pstreams-devel-0.8.1-2.fc22.x86_64
>  + exit 0
>
>
>  i.e. you should see "Wrote: " telling you where the RPM files are, and
>  then "exit 0" at the very end. 
Very good, I know now how a succesfull rpmbuild ends.
As for my first rpmbuild, it is the opportunity which make me do this
build. I am a archlinux user running a Fedora nspawn container. The
container has vocation to be a prod server for data computing with R.
To speed R, I need to build it with Intel libs. So I must succeed. I
am sure, as always, I am missing something obvious and simple.


>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 15/09/15 23:22 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> As for my first rpmbuild, it is the opportunity which make me do this
> build. I am a archlinux user running a Fedora nspawn container. The
> container has vocation to be a prod server for data computing with R.
> To speed R, I need to build it with Intel libs. So I must succeed. I
> am sure, as always, I am missing something obvious and simple. 
I don't understand why this means you have to start with a complicated
spec file that you don't understand. Why can't you download an
existing srpm and build that, just to check rpmbuild works correctly?

Once you know the basics work, try something more complicated. You
don't need to go from 0% to 100% in a single step.

[Christopher Meng]

Also, when will you stop posting your failures at here? I see most of
failures are caused by yourself. Basically, I'd read docs first. From
your tons of email here, the only thing I can summarize is that your
mind is in a whirl.

Meanwhile, it appears lots of Archlinux users treat mailing list like forum.

-- 

Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng

http://awk.io

[arnaud gaboury]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Christopher Meng <i(a)cicku.me&gt; wrote:
>  Also, when will you stop posting your failures at here? I see most
> of
>  failures are caused by yourself. 
Ha ha, of course ! It is my mistakes thus why I
ask for hints.
Basically, I'd read docs first.

I did read a lot of rpm packages.
 From
>  your tons of email here, the only thing I can summarize is that your
>  mind is in a whirl.
>
>  Meanwhile, it appears lots of Archlinux users treat mailing list like forum. 
If you know a better tool, let me know
>  --
>
>  Yours sincerely,
>  Christopher Meng
>
>  http://awk.io
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:31:57 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:

>  >> >> These last lines are part of the %file section,
>  >> >
>  >> > Why have you deleted the lines?
>  >> > What did they tell?
>  >>
>  >> I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output
>  >> when running rpmbuild. I thereafter come back to command shell.
>  >
>  > Which are the "last few lines"?
>  
>  Below is the last part of rpmbuild screen output: 

>  Processing files: R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64 
 
That doesn't match your earlier quote. In the earlier quote you've
shown the following last lines:

  | Processing files: R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
  | Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files

Which made me ask whether the last line is truncated? It's missing
the buildroot path.

Now you've shown output where the check-files call is missing.
That makes it much harder to guess what you are doing.

It smells a lot like either you've broken your rpmbuild environment,
or the spec file messes with macros, variables and env vars too much
to break something.

>  > You refer to "These last lines are part of the %file
> section".
>  > Which last lines are that? I don't see any lines that refer to your
>  > %files section.
>  
>  When I refer to %file section is beacuse I have been watching all
>  outputs, no errors during %configure, %build and %install. I "guess"
>  (maybe I am wrong) that the build would have stoped before the %file
>  section in case of errors. 
That's now how I've understood that comment. Rpmbuild output referring
to %files sections typically is the check for unpackaged/packaged files,
duplicate files, and related errors/warnings. Anything before that is
not about the %files sections but about the %prep, %build, %install
stages.

>  > Also, normally the check-files script is called with the
> buildroot
>  > as the first argument. In your output that's missing. Is the output
>  > truncated or not?
>  
>  YES it is. 
"YES" to what? Truncated or not? It would have been better to answer
either:

  Yes, it is truncated.
or
  No, it is not truncated.

;-)

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>
> The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
> and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
> Fedora R package[1].
>
> I setup the directory structure:
> % ls ~/.rpmbuild
> BUILD/  BUILDROOT/  RPMS/  SOURCES/  SPECS/  SRPMS/
>
> Then:
>
> % cd ~/.rpmbuild
> % rpmlint SPEC/R.spec  ==> OK
> % rpmbuild -ba SPEC/R.spec
> ...... BUILD ....
> Processing files: R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Provides: R-KernSmooth = 2.23.15 R-MASS = 7.3.43 R-Matrix = 1.2.2
> R-base = 3.2.1 R-boot = 1.3.17 R-class = 7.3.13 R-cluster = 2.0.3
> R-codetools = 0.2.14 R-core = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-core(x86-64) =
> 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-datasets = 3.2.1 R-foreign = 0.8.65 R-grDevices =
> 3.2.1 R-graphics = 3.2.1 R-grid = 3.2.1 R-lattice = 0.20.33 R-methods
> = 3.2.1 R-mgcv = 1.8.7 R-nlme = 3.1.121 R-nnet = 7.3.10 R-parallel =
> 3.2.1 R-rpart = 4.1.10 R-spatial = 7.3.10 R-splines = 3.2.1 R-stats =
> 3.2.1 R-stats4 = 3.2.1 R-survival = 2.38.3 R-tcltk = 3.2.1 R-tools =
> 3.2.1 R-utils = 3.2.1 config(R-core) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libR.so()(64bit)
> libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit)
> Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires(post): /bin/sh
> Requires(preun): /bin/sh
> Requires(postun): /bin/sh
> Requires(posttrans): /bin/sh
> Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
> ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libR.so()(64bit)
> libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.16)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
> libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
> libicui18n.so.54()(64bit) libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)
> libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) libifport.so.5()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
> libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libiomp5.so()(64bit)
> libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) libirc.so()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit)
> liblzma.so.5()(64bit) liblzma.so.5(XZ_5.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
> libpcre.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
> librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsvml.so()(64bit)
> libtcl8.6.so()(64bit) libtk8.6.so()(64bit) libtre.so.5()(64bit)
> libz.so.1()(64bit)
> Obsoletes: R-Matrix < 0.999375-7
> Processing files: R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Provides: R-Matrix-devel = 1.2.2 R-core-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> R-core-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libR) = 3.2.1
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> Obsoletes: R-Matrix-devel < 0.999375-7
> Processing files: R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Processing files: libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a2fYbJ
> + umask 022
> + cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD 
This shows that rpmbuild is using ~/rpmbuild/BUILD, but you said above
you are using ~/.rpmbuild

I think you are putting files in one directory and expecting the
output there, but you've told rpmbuild to use a different location for
the output.

[arnaud gaboury]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >
> > I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
> >
> > The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
> > and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
> > Fedora R package[1].
> >
> > I setup the directory structure:
> > % ls ~/.rpmbuild
> > BUILD/  BUILDROOT/  RPMS/  SOURCES/  SPECS/  SRPMS/
> >
> > Then:
> >
> > % cd ~/.rpmbuild
> > % rpmlint SPEC/R.spec  ==> OK
> > % rpmbuild -ba SPEC/R.spec
> > ...... BUILD ....
> > Processing files: R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Provides: R-KernSmooth = 2.23.15 R-MASS = 7.3.43 R-Matrix = 1.2.2
> > R-base = 3.2.1 R-boot = 1.3.17 R-class = 7.3.13 R-cluster = 2.0.3
> > R-codetools = 0.2.14 R-core = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-core(x86-64) =
> > 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 R-datasets = 3.2.1 R-foreign = 0.8.65 R-grDevices =
> > 3.2.1 R-graphics = 3.2.1 R-grid = 3.2.1 R-lattice = 0.20.33 R-methods
> > = 3.2.1 R-mgcv = 1.8.7 R-nlme = 3.1.121 R-nnet = 7.3.10 R-parallel =
> > 3.2.1 R-rpart = 4.1.10 R-spatial = 7.3.10 R-splines = 3.2.1 R-stats =
> > 3.2.1 R-stats4 = 3.2.1 R-survival = 2.38.3 R-tcltk = 3.2.1 R-tools =
> > 3.2.1 R-utils = 3.2.1 config(R-core) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 libR.so()(64bit)
> > libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit)
> > Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Requires(post): /bin/sh
> > Requires(preun): /bin/sh
> > Requires(postun): /bin/sh
> > Requires(posttrans): /bin/sh
> > Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
> > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libR.so()(64bit)
> > libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> > libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.16)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
> > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
> > libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
> > libicui18n.so.54()(64bit) libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)
> > libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) libifport.so.5()(64bit) libimf.so()(64bit)
> > libintlc.so.5()(64bit) libiomp5.so()(64bit)
> > libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) libirc.so()(64bit) libirng.so()(64bit)
> > liblzma.so.5()(64bit) liblzma.so.5(XZ_5.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
> > libpcre.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> > libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
> > librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsvml.so()(64bit)
> > libtcl8.6.so()(64bit) libtk8.6.so()(64bit) libtre.so.5()(64bit)
> > libz.so.1()(64bit)
> > Obsoletes: R-Matrix < 0.999375-7
> > Processing files: R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Provides: R-Matrix-devel = 1.2.2 R-core-devel = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22
> > R-core-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.1-mkl.fc22 pkgconfig(libR) = 3.2.1
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > Obsoletes: R-Matrix-devel < 0.999375-7
> > Processing files: R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Processing files: libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
> > Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a2fYbJ
> > + umask 022
> > + cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD
>
>
>  This shows that rpmbuild is using ~/rpmbuild/BUILD, but you said above
>  you are using ~/.rpmbuild 
My bad, typing too fast and bad habits of home directories with a
leading dot. It is ~/rpmbuild indeed. BUIL and BUILDROOT are populated
after rpmbuild. But RPMS stay empty. I must have misconfigured
something in my spec file maybe. My ~/.rpmmacros is minimum and Fedora
up to date and working smooth.
Maybe a hint : I use zsh (do not still see why it would break the build).
>  I think you are putting files in one directory and expecting the
>  output there, but you've told rpmbuild to use a different location for
>  the output.
>
>
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
As a more gneral comment, why not try something *much* simpler for
your first rpmbuild?

Try something that doesn't use an alternative compiler, doesn't
require lots of environment variables, and doesn't use a new spec file
that has never been successfully tested.

Maybe just take a working spec file for another project and run
rpmbuild, and check the results. That would reveal if you're looking
in the wrong place for the output, and you wouldn't waste time looking
for problems in the spec file if you know the spec file is already
correct.

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

>  On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>  >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>  
>  As a more gneral comment, why not try something *much* simpler for
>  your first rpmbuild?
>  
>  Try something that doesn't use an alternative compiler, doesn't
>  require lots of environment variables, and doesn't use a new spec file
>  that has never been successfully tested.
>  
>  Maybe just take a working spec file for another project and run
>  rpmbuild, and check the results. That would reveal if you're looking
>  in the wrong place for the output, and you wouldn't waste time looking
>  for problems in the spec file if you know the spec file is already
>  correct. 
Also try --short-circuit builds for the individual %build and %install
sections. "rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit specfile" is extremely helpful
for debugging problems in %install and %files sections as it skips the
earlier successful %build stage.

[arnaud gaboury]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
> >
> > As a more gneral comment, why not try something *much* simpler for
> > your first rpmbuild?
> >
> > Try something that doesn't use an alternative compiler, doesn't
> > require lots of environment variables, and doesn't use a new spec file
> > that has never been successfully tested.
> >
> > Maybe just take a working spec file for another project and run
> > rpmbuild, and check the results. That would reveal if you're looking
> > in the wrong place for the output, and you wouldn't waste time looking
> > for problems in the spec file if you know the spec file is already
> > correct.
>
>  Also try --short-circuit builds for the individual %build and %install
>  sections. "rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit specfile" is extremely helpful
>  for debugging problems in %install and %files sections as it skips the
>  earlier successful %build stage. 
Building rpm step by step gave me the solution:
$ rpmbuild -v -bc SPECS/R.spec
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-ip': not a valid identifier
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-ipo': not a valid identifier
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-opt-mem-layout-trans=3':
not a valid identifier
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-xHost': not a valid identifier
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-mavx -fp-model precise
-DMKL_ILP64 -qopenmp-parallel
-I/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.109/linux/mkl/include':
not a valid identifier

My build flags were not correctly set.
Then I kept on secion by section, with no errors.

$ rpmbuild -v -ba SPECS/R.spec
<----------BUILD---------------->
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/SRPMS/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.src.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libRmath-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libRmath-static-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm
Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.f7bTCJ
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd R-3.2.1
+ /usr/bin/rm -rf /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64
+ exit 0
---------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for your interest in my issue and your patience. And please
apologize for the "tons" of emails in an open source community mailing
list ;-)
Result is here.

>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Dave Love]

arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:

>  I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>
>  The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
>  and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
>  Fedora R package[1]. 
Why?  I ask as someone who supports R rpms on HPC systems and knows a
bit about relevant libraries and compilers.

If you want to subvert R's BLAS (and other slower versions) with
something largely optimal, look at the openblas-compat package under
<https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/loveshack/livhpc/>;.  [Yes, linear
algebra in Fedora is a shambles, with at least one failed attempt to
sort it out, but adding Intel stuff will only make things worse, and
that package finesses the issue fairly handily.]

[arnaud gaboury]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Dave Love <d.love(a)liverpool.ac.uk&gt; wrote:
>  arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:
>
> > I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
> >
> > The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
> > and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
> > Fedora R package[1].
>
>  Why?  I ask as someone who supports R rpms on HPC systems and knows a
>  bit about relevant libraries and compilers. 
Please visit this blog[0] or many other talking about R-benchmark.R.
>  If you want to subvert R's BLAS (and other slower versions) with
>  something largely optimal, look at the openblas-compat package under
>  <https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/loveshack/livhpc/>;.  [Yes, linear
>  algebra in Fedora is a shambles, with at least one failed attempt to
>  sort it out, but adding Intel stuff will only make things worse, and
>  that package finesses the issue fairly handily.] 
I agree than open-blas is a good soultion, but not as fast as the
Intel BLAS libraries.

[0]http://blog.nguyenvq.com/blog/2014/11/10/optimized-r-and-python-standar...
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 


-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx

[Dave Love]

arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:

> > Why?  I ask as someone who supports R rpms on HPC systems and
> knows a
> > bit about relevant libraries and compilers.
>
>  Please visit this blog[0] or many other talking about R-benchmark.R. 
I don't think this is the place for a lecture on all that's wrong with
that; it's the sort of thing I try to educate users about.

> > If you want to subvert R's BLAS (and other slower versions)
> with
> > something largely optimal, look at the openblas-compat package under
> > <https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/loveshack/livhpc/>;.  [Yes, linear
> > algebra in Fedora is a shambles, with at least one failed attempt to
> > sort it out, but adding Intel stuff will only make things worse, and
> > that package finesses the issue fairly handily.]
>
>  I agree than open-blas is a good soultion, but not as fast as the
>  Intel BLAS libraries. 
So are published, apparently-reproducible, results to the contrary by
OpenBLAS maintainers and others, wrong due to incompetence or
dishonesty?  Likewise for unpublished ones I've made in cases of
interest, and analysis of myths about Intel's code generation.

Anyhow, there's a demonstration that you don't need to rebuild Fedora
rpms to use a different BLAS.

-- 
Stand back I'm going to try SCIENCE  — XKCD