Re: rpms/olpc-utils/OLPC-2 .cvsignore,1.6,1.7 sources,1.7,1.8

[Patrice Dumas]

On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:29:28PM -0500, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>  @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>   f64cae9acc5961afb4bf7c6fc985ff18  olpc-utils-0.33.tar.bz2
>  +ca2a83b5d4b34e66298a1262a84d6e95  olpc-utils-0.41.tar.bz2 
This is still not fixed? I warned a week ago.

--
Pat

rpms/olpc-utils/OLPC-2 .cvsignore,1.6,1.7 sources,1.7,1.8

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:32:51 +0100
Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr&gt; wrote:

>  On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:29:28PM -0500, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>  > @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>  >  f64cae9acc5961afb4bf7c6fc985ff18  olpc-utils-0.33.tar.bz2
>  > +ca2a83b5d4b34e66298a1262a84d6e95  olpc-utils-0.41.tar.bz2
>  
>  This is still not fixed? I warned a week ago.
>  
>  --
>  Pat
>   

Are you sending it directly to Bernardo?  He may not be on this list.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

rpms/olpc-utils/OLPC-2 .cvsignore,1.6,1.7 sources,1.7,1.8

[Patrice Dumas]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:00:13AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
>  On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:32:51 +0100
>  Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr&gt; wrote:
>  
>  > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:29:28PM -0500, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>  > > @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>  > >  f64cae9acc5961afb4bf7c6fc985ff18  olpc-utils-0.33.tar.bz2
>  > > +ca2a83b5d4b34e66298a1262a84d6e95  olpc-utils-0.41.tar.bz2
>  > 
>  > This is still not fixed? I warned a week ago.
>  
>  Are you sending it directly to Bernardo?  He may not be on this list. 
I am sending where a reply to the commit mail sends.

--
Pat

rpms/olpc-utils/OLPC-2 .cvsignore,1.6,1.7 sources,1.7,1.8

[Bernie Innocenti]

On 11/06/07 09:00, Jesse Keating wrote:
>  On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:32:51 +0100
>  Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr&gt; wrote:
>  
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:29:28PM -0500, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
> >>  f64cae9acc5961afb4bf7c6fc985ff18  olpc-utils-0.33.tar.bz2
> >> +ca2a83b5d4b34e66298a1262a84d6e95  olpc-utils-0.41.tar.bz2
> > This is still not fixed? I warned a week ago.
>
>  Are you sending it directly to Bernardo?  He may not be on this list. 
I'm subscribed, but I don't read every single thread and failed
to notice Patrice's observations.  This list munges the Reply-To
header, so please add me to Cc to make sure I notice your future
reviews.

Patrice, yesterday I noticed this problem myself and fixed
it right here:

 revision 1.8
 date: 2007/11/06 00:46:43;  author: bernie;  state: Exp;  lines: +0 -5
 Kill off all the old source tarballs.

I've also just learned about "make new-sources".  Previously,
I was stupidly using "make upload" to update my tarballs!
Please, forgive this newbie packager :-)

I've also spotted additional comments on the source tarball,
which I will address with the next round of changes.
Thank you for your review.

Moreover, after 5-6 iterations, I'm starting to feel the urge
to automate my work-flow from patching the source to pushing
the binary rpms a little more.  That would solve another
class of mistakes caused by distraction, and would remove
the tedious part of maintaining packages.  Are there some
quick automake macros for generating spec files from
configure.ac?  And maybe a recipes for extracting the log
file from git's log?

-- 
 \___/
 |___|   Bernardo Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
  \___\  One Laptop Per Child - http://www.laptop.org/